The Controversy Over The Use Of Stem Cells

Improved Essays
Thousands of people are treated with stem cells every year in the United States. Stem cells are used in many different ways to better the world and save lives. People debate whether or not it is ethically okay to use stem cells for research. The government is funding this research, so the benefits most likely outweigh the moral issues.
There are a few unique properties that all stem cells share. One unique property is that stem cells are unspecialized. They do not have tissue-specific structures and are pluripotent. This means that stem cells can become almost any other type of body cell. Another unique property of stem cells is that they can divide and renew themselves for long periods of time. The stem cells are placed in a lab to replicate
…show more content…
An argument that is in favor of stem cell research is that blastocysts under a week old are not developed into humans yet. An embryo isn 't considered a human until it is at least two weeks old. The benefits of stem cell research are also greater than ethical issues. Also, research will continue with or without government funding, so the government should fund this live saving research (Pros and Cons).
There are also many arguments against stem cell research. People argue that destroying embryos is also destroying innocent lives. Stem cells should only be used from babies that were aborted. Abortion isn 't a good thing, but at least the unborn babies will have somewhat of a purpose in life. A lot of taxpayers don 't think their money should be going towards something that they all don 't agree with.
My personal opinion on stem cell research is that it should be allowed and funded by the government. If I had a fatal disease that was curable or treatable with stem cells, I would be really glad that they did the research to save my life. I don 't think stem cells taken from embryos is considered destroying life. The embryos are not developed into human form, and therefore are used in research to save lives (Pros and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Christopher Smith's article "Perils and Promise: Destroy an Embryo, Waste a Life", expresses how embryonic stem cell research is not beneficial in any way. If you kill an embryo to save someone else, there is no impact. In fact, the result is neutralized. Although here may be groups of human beings who support embryonic stem cell research, the idea itself surpasses the rules and regulations established in a functional society. The morals and ethics obtained by many people may be rearranged by which human beings may eventually dissocialize.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a big question about the ethics evaluation that researchers must do. Even if the embryos used for research have been fertilized for research purposes or are aborted fetuses, they are still human lives that will be disposed of when they have served their purpose. This is why religious groups, moral activists, and the government are opposed to stem cell research,…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, the reason we should publicly fund the embryonic research is because we would be able to have a regulated research to prevent the worst. In a Vanderbilt article “Funding the Future: Embryonic Stem Cell Research” it says “the opportunity to clearly define regulations for ethical research”(Stan/2017/Vanderbilt/“Funding the Future: Embryonic Stem Cell Research”). This quote proves that the research can lead to health benefits. In an NPR article “Stem Cell Research: An NPR Special Report” it says “private sector research may lead to ethical abuses”(Arti K. RaI/2017/NPR/“Stem Cell Research: An NPR Special Report”). Shows that publicly funding it can prevent ethical abuses and the research can be regulated under the government’s watch.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All great leaps in our society have first met with some moral conflict. Scientists today are facing the use of embryonic stems cells and if their use takes away a human life. It has been proven this small group of specialized cells can treat many diseases that we have battled for some time. In the case of the embryonic stem cell research, it is almost impossible to respect both moral principles of respecting the value of a human life and to prevent or alleviate suffering. These two principles are what have created the debate on embryonic stem cell research and use.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine a world where any medical ailment, whether it’s cancer or the common cold, can be cured. Broken bones are as easy to fix as a small scrape, and diseases like AIDS that kill white blood cells and weaken the immune system are not as life threatening as they used to be. While this fantasy world isn’t a reality, it could be. Enter the stem cell: An amazing feat of the human body.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just think, one day your grandma can’t remember your name. You tell her 5 times, but she still doesn’t know who you are at all. It has been one month since you last saw her. You call your parents and they tell you to take her to the hospital. The doctors then do a CT scan and find that your grandma has developed a moderate to severe case of Alzheimers.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that it is ethical and that it is something that should be done. There is a huge debate over the ethics of stem cell research. There are many sides of the ethical debate; there are four main arguments. First one being that embryo is considered a living person from fertilization on. Secondly, an embryo is considered a human after fourteen days, because the central…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people are opposed to embryonic stem cell research as it is necessary to terminate a living human embryo, which individuals like Pro life advocates think of as murder. There are two different types of stem cells we can encounter, embryonic stem cells and somatic stem cells also known as body cells. These cells are very important for living organisms as the embryo forms the structure for the foundation of the organism like muscle cells. Stem cells render a possibility for the treatment of diseases like heart diseases or macular degeneration. “Using adult stem cells drawn from bone marrow and umbilical cord blood stem cells, scientists have discovered new treatments for scores of diseases and conditions such as Parkinson's disease, juvenile diabetes, and spinal cord injuries.”…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although scientific research has come a long way since the beginning of time, it has not done so without some kind of controversy. From Biopsychiatry to the Tuskegee Experiments, it seems as though there cannot be any scientific breakthrough without some kind of ethical issue. Stem cells are another example of a controversial treatment that is taking the medical field by storm. Although it is very controversial, it’s results are truly amazing and beneficial to anyone who is willing to give it a try. Stem cells have the potential to divide into special cells through a process called “mitosis”.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The use of human embryonic stem cells has been hailed as the next major step in the battle against serious degenerative disorders such as diabetes and heart disease, and for some, debilitating for lethal neurological diseases, such as Parkinson’s. (Braude, Minger & Warwick). However this is a hotly debated issue. Ethical Dilemma The main controversy surrounding stem cell research isn’t about “if” it should be done or not, but rather what source of stem cells are okay to use and what methods are okay for obtaining them.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Embryonic stem cell research is ethical because the rightful owners of the cells chose their fate. Additionally, instead of being discarded the cells are used for a higher purpose. The holders of the embryos should have the option of whether or not they want to discard or donate their cells. Embryonic stem cell research should continue because the donation process is completely…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Embryonic stem cell research is an attempt to use embryonic stem cells to find cure for diseases. Although science has found cure for many diseases in last few years, it is not possible to cure every single disease. Thus we should not be killing embryos, to cure disease. As we are finding cure to the deadliest, we are also planning to kill lives by using up embryos. While it might save lives, embryonic stem cell research should not be allowed because it is against all the religions, lives should not be sacrificed to save another life, and it is doubtful that a single cell has potential to save lives.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Embryonic stem cell research is an ongoing controversial topic that is still a major issue today. It is a subject that starts a debate every moment it is brought up. This topic will continue throughout time to be a controversial subject. There is one thing that will not change in this topic and it is the facts that go along with it. Each side has an argument that has information to back it up but there are important factors that will remain the same.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though I am entirely for stem cell research I see the other side of the controversy: scientists are using embryos which is where all humans once came from for a science experiment. Scientists aren't stealing fetuses at all, instead they are using the stem cells from aborted…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One argument against stem cell research is that the development of the fertilized egg to a baby is a continuous process that should not be stopped, and that the moment the egg is fertilized, the egg should be considered a human (Embryonic). A second argument against stem cell research is that the people who are for stem cell research, are making ridiculous decisions about human life based off of age, and that if we would consider having a nervous system is what makes a person, and someone loses their nerve cells, would not be considered less human (Embryonic). The final argument against stem cell research is that if someone stops the process of the fertilized egg becoming an embryo, then we are stopping the egg from becoming a human…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays