Gun Control: Known In Every State Of The United States

Great Essays
Gun Control is a debate that is known in every state of the United States of America. Many of the debates are in congress or the senate. These debates are about is existing laws are sufficient enough or if we need more. When it comes to votes, 52 percent are against gun control. While 46 percent are for gun control. Sure, there are school shootings, but those are criminals. What about the citizens that own guns for hunting and in collections. They deserve to own guns without worry of losing them to a law because of a few school shootings. It doesn’t make sense why so many congressmen and senate men are so afraid of about less than 50 school shootings. Gun control is utterly useless if you ask me and really any other gun owning southerner could …show more content…
If gun control fails, people can fight back using their own guns. Not only that, but if criminals know civilians have guns, they would be in fear of being shot and would not attempt illegal acts. This not only will decrease crime, but also decrease how many people are killed by criminals. To be honest, I thinks that more police officers are needed, along with marines on rooftops. With criminals in fear of being shot with lethal and nonlethal weapons, they won’t commit crimes.With soldiers on the rooftops, they could spot a crime as they receive a message and they use their tranquilizer weapons. Neutralizing the receiving end of the tranquilizer weapon, then police arresting the offender. This will definitely be very effective because police no longer have to chase on foot, soldiers in the roofs will neutralizing the offender so police have an easy job. No longer will police run their little hearts out to chase someone who may or may not have better cardio then them, they only need the soldiers in the roofs. Doing this will also cause fear in criminal brains. Thus, decreasing crime by at least half or less, it is just a guess. A wild guess to decrease crime, yes. It could be correct, criminals would be afraid of being shot or arrested so they would not do the crime. I know most everyone else would, so why not criminals? They are …show more content…
It should be patrols of marines with tranquilizer, taser, lethal, and nonlethal grade weaponry, along with batons and handcuffs. Gun control is really useless in this matter. All that is needed is heavily armed soldiers and police. It may seem like Communism, but it really isn’t, it is simply government enforcers uphold the law. The fear of all the armed forces will decrease murders and crime, at the same time, some criminals may give up crime for good. Hopefully we will not have to supply the forces with anything but non-lethal pepper balls instead of lethal-grade weapons or ammunition. As I see it, we will have to soon, because criminals are committing more and more crimes everyday. If the government does not act quickly, we will be overrun with crime and murder. Soon, criminals will work for terrorists if gun control is allowed to exist any longer. What America needs are enforcers, not gun control. This leads us to where crimes are more frequent and lethal. The soldiers would then be able to have honor of protecting America, within America, by protecting the people from criminals. It seems like nothing much but it is as important as fighting terrorists. When soldiers are ordered to help with law enforcement, there will be instant changes. Police will have easier time catching law offenders and bring justice to the land quicker. Thus, having our country safer and more livable to

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Roth concluded that “Several strategies may succeed in reducing gun murders, but rigorous evaluations are needed to ascertain their effectiveness. Among these are reducing firearm lethality (e.g., by banning certain types of ammunition), reducing unauthorized use (e.g., through combination locks on triggers, or sentence enhancements for burglary and fencing violations that involve guns), and educating the public about safe use and storage” (Roth, 2007). He concludes that not gun banning, but reform related to education and pursuing the criminality of illegal arms trade will curb gun violence in the United States. His overall conclusion from his findings is: “Where there is local support, priority should be given to three enforcement objectives: disrupting illegal gun markets; reducing juveniles ' access to guns; and close cooperation between the police and the community to set priorities and enforce laws” (Roth, 2007). Only by working together can the government and its citizens in the U.S. aim to curve violent crime.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control In Mexico

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Though gun control is a necessary thing, many are against stricter gun control laws. Those opposed to stricter gun control laws would state that gun control would have no effect on reducing crime (Gottieb 1991). However, according to the Huffington Post, which states that with “Higher gun violence tend to have much less stringent gun laws” (States 2013). Having gun laws that put severe restrictions on guns are unhelpful and impractical. The government can make it almost impossible to obtain a…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We need a way to protect our self from our government. About everyone is armed, yet the crime and violence rate is extremely low! If we start controlling the guns for civilians, they won 't be able to protect themselves, and who say criminals will obey that law? Even if there is minimal control, it will make it so much harder for civilians to defend themselves! If your children are being attacked and you have nothing to help, no guns to defend them, you will have let them…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Less Lethal Weapons

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The decrease in the use of bullets could only have a positive effect. Less-lethal weapons also help to keep criminals from harming officers. I learned about…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On one side you have those who are for gun control as gun violence has become a serious problem in America. On the other side of the coin you have American citizens who believe strongly in their right to bear arms as it is a staple of the rights all Americans are granted. In the US, there are roughly 283 million guns in civilian hands. Although this in and of itself does not seem particularly damaging or harmful to anyone, the amount of deaths because of these guns shows otherwise. It has been reported that over 30,000 people are killed each year as a result of gun violence, ⅓ of these deaths consist of people under the age of 20.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Control Amber N. Arnold American Politics 210 Dr. Rob Mellen 12/30/15 Gun Control 1 The Second Amendment to the United States recites that citizens have the right to possess and bear arms. The constitution was signed on September 17, 1789 and federalists declared that the new government would only have a finite amount of power delegated to it. This was not enough for the anti-federalists which included George Mason, who wanted absolute guarantees to particular rights in order to avoid any possible encroachment by the Federal government. One of the rights in the particular is the right…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun Control is the power of government that sets limits on guns, and has recently government using its power to find the best way to prevent things like school shootings and other sources of gun violence in the country, and government knows that for people to keep their guns they must be responsible. Guns are a resource to many because they provide a way of sports, money, and hunting for citizens in the US, but some believe that guns are too dangerous for citizens to own and that the total removal of guns would be the only way to prevent gun violence. The US government is taking all precautions and actions to preventing school shootings. “26 people died after gunman Adam Lanza rampaged through a western Connecticut elementary school.…

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The government tries to take control guns that are carried in the United States. Should the government even go that far to stop people from doing what they feel is best? The government and states should not control guns to such extents. People have the right to carry weapons as long as it is for defense and that is under protection from the United States Amendment II. Gun control violates the Second Amendment.…

    • 2457 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Going back to the idea that the government could take away all the firearms from civilians, we have to face the fact that even that would not protect anyone. Instead, it would put many people in danger. The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law. Without guns for protection, the law-abiding citizens would be helpless to defend themselves against the criminals who would now be the only citizens with guns. The law that was meant to protect would actually lead to the victimization and possible death of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many believe that law enforcement should be the ones in charge of protecting the community, it is clear that we shouldn’t have to wait for someone who may not be around the corner to come and protect us or our property when we can do it ourselves. It seems that criminals and shooters tend to attack soft targets, for example, elementary schools, churches, theaters, places where it’s unlikely for someone to fight back with a firearm. Allowing citizens to own weapons can prevent many crimes because criminals would think twice before committing a crime due to the possibility that someone may be nearby with a firearm ready to fight back. Many citizens also believe that gun laws will reduce the amount of crimes committed because criminals will not have access to guns. In reality, criminals are criminals because they don’t follow the…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Intro When the word Columbine is stated almost everyone knows what is being referred to without even having to ask. The amount of gun violence that has pledged our country over the past decade is almost astonishing. Events like the Columbine shooting being so horrific that those who were never directly affected still get chills when thinking about that day. Gun control is a pressing topic in the United States today and it is something that is heavily debated on. Gun laws need to be changed and more strict.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States, the use of guns should be more harshly regulated. For example, if a gun is purchased in a store, a background check is run. However, guns can also be bought at places such as gun shows. In most states, it is not required for sellers at these shows to run background checks.…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you look at the facts, firearms are over 300 times more likely to stop crime, than to cause a crime. If guns were to be taken away from these citizens, murder rates would rise, and the chance to stop crime would drop immensely. In 2015, a tragic terrorist attack occurred in San Bernardino, California. Despite this states intense gun control, an attack was still carried out.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If criminals have access to illegal guns and will acquire them, then the police who are lawfully unarmed will have no protection. This will cause an uneven shift in crime and punishment, throwing off the…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics