Pros And Cons Of The Lincoln-Douglas Debates

Improved Essays
The Lincoln-Douglas debates, also known as the Great Debates of 1858, were a series of seven debates between two politicians running for the senate seat of the state of Illinois. The politicians were the republican nominee, Abraham Lincoln, and the democratic nominee, incumbent Stephen Douglas. The debates covered a series of topics, the most pertinent being the issue of slavery and its expansion into the newer western territories. The idea of the debates came forth after both Lincoln and Douglass had given speeches opposing one another in two of Illinois’ congressional districts. Lincoln and Douglas agreed to the series of seven debates in the remaining congressional districts: Ottawa, Freeport, Jonesboro, Charleston, Galesburg, Quincy, and …show more content…
Due to this statement, Douglas, in the first debate held in Ottawa, attempted to portray Lincoln as an abolitionist saying that his party was a “Black Republican party, who are in favor of the citizenship of the Negro”. Lincoln disputed this however, stating that the black man “…is not my equal in many respects… But in the right to eat the bread without the leave of anybody else, which his own hand earns, he is my equal… and the equal of every living man”. He continued to say leading up to the final debate the city of Alton, that the declaration of independence “intended to include all men, but they did not mean to declare all men equal in all respects”. He further disputed Douglas’ claims that he was an abolitionist through his support of the fugitive slave act which returned escaped slaves in the north to their owners back south. Lincoln stated that the point of his debates was not to abolish slavery in the old southern states but to stop it from spreading to the newer territories acquired in the …show more content…
Sandford. Lincoln tried to force Douglas to choose between his principle of popular sovereignty proposed in his Kansas-Nebraska Act which created the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska and endowed the citizens the legislative power to decide, through popular sovereignty, whether or not they would allow slavery, and the decision reached by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. The case surrounded an enslaved African American man that was suing for his freedom after being held captive within the boundaries of two free states. The issues before the court had been whether or not entering “free” territory made a slave free and whether this freedom granted blacks the ability to sue in federal court. The justices ruled that under the language of the constitution did not apply to blacks because within the context of when the constitution was written, slaves were seen solely as property and had no rights. This Decision of the justices as well as the Kansas-Nebraska Act voided the Missouri

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Passed by Congress in may of 1854, the Kansas Nebraska Act may be the most significant of the Pre-Civil War compromises. It admitted the Kansas and Nebraska as states, but rather than decide whether the territories would become slave or non-slave states based on their location in relation to the 36’ 30° line, they were allowed to choose for themselves. Kansas and Nebraska were not the only ones allowed to decide though, each territory was allowed to choose for itself if it would be a slave or non-slave state. This allowing of territories to choose slave or non-slave is called popular sovereignty. In popular sovereignty the people of the territory vote to decide if they will become a slave state or a non-slave state.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery has been one of the most talked about subjects in history. It is a significantly important in our history. The Antebellum period was known for many reform movements. Slavery supported the economy of the United States, the nation went from underdeveloped farmers to becoming a driving force financially. It influenced important leaders, which eventually lead to war.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was created to replace the Articles of Confederation, since the Articles of Confederation granted too little power to the federal government, which caused Shay’s rebellion. Within the Constitution, there are laws that both limit and give power to the federal government and other laws that protected citizen’s natural rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness or property. The Constitution that was once the cause of national unity caused the Union to split into two separate sides: the abolitionist North, and the slave-holding South. The reasoning of this is mainly due to the Constitution’s ability to adapt to changes according the circumstances.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Brown Dbq Essay

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This claim drew a political wedge among the Democratic and the developed Republican Party that Lincoln was a part of. The abolitionist perspective of the North attributed to their growing hostility towards the southerner’s ideals about slavery as shown in Lincoln’s denouncement of southern ideals. Frederick Douglass, a free African-American author, reminisced about his relationship with John Brown and how he respected him very much, so much to claim that it is an “honor to ourselves in doing and honor to him, for it implies the possession of qualities akin to his” (F). Frederick’s heightened respect for Brown stems from Brown’s purpose of his cause. John Brown sought to free slaves in his attack on Harpers Ferry.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court decided that blacks such as Dred Scott, a slave from Missouri, were constitutionally protected private property of their owners and could not be taken away without due process; therefore, Congress did not have the authority to regulate or restrict slavery in the territories. The court ruled that Congress had no authority to stop slavery from expanding in federal territories, rendering e the Missouri Compromise useless and invalidating the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 rule of popular sovereignty. The decision of the Supreme Court implied to Northerners that slavery had no boundaries and could move without restrictions, into the north with the support of the government. The northerners worried that the Supreme Court would rule against northern state laws in the future which forbid the existence of slavery, in essence, nationalizing…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In The Radical and the Republican: Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, and the Triumph of Antislavery Politics, the author, James Oakes, articulates Abraham Lincolns and Frederick Douglass’s attitudes in regard to the issue of abolition and the freedom of slaves. Whilst Frederick Douglass was inactive in politics, he was a radical heavily engaged in the abolition of slavery. On the other hand, Andrew Jackson was a diligent Republican politician who had strong notions towards the enslavement of blacks. Although they came from different backgrounds and had divergent idealistic views, ultimately they joined forces to fight for the implementation of the emancipation and the nullification of slavery.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Their heated debates were primarily focusing on the issue of slavery and states’ rights. The format of the debate was the first speaker spoke for sixty minutes; the other speaker spoke for ninety minutes, and then the first speaker returned for a thirty-minute “rejoinder.” Although the senators were elected by the congress in the 19th century, Douglas and Lincoln took their debates to the public was mainly for their party’s broader election interests of aiming to become the majority in the Illinois legislature. Similar to the political rhetoric in today’s elections, Douglas tried to label Lincoln as the extreme Abolitionists to instill fear in the local suffrage; partisan politicians’ mud slinging, crushing opponents’ moral conscience or patriotism were common practices even before the two-parties…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    America formed many compromises to resolve political disputes between the years of 1820 and 1860. Many of political uprisings were caused by the conflict over slavery; should slavery be legal, or abolished? The Second Great Awakening was a religious reform in the early nineteenth century America, preachers like Charles Finney travelled around the world to lecture people about the importance of religion. These preachers lectured to their audience that their sins could be cleansed forever.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alyssa Khoury Mr. Brennan APUSH 1/1/16 Sectionalism in the 1800s In the early 1800s, sectionalism between the North and the South was based on slavery. While the North completely disagreed with the idea of slavery, the South was all for the idea of slavery. As more time has passed, slavery became a greater issue. Throughout the United States of America, life for the slaves had slightly changed.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America expanded quickly, but it didn’t come without controversy. The country was divided on whether slavery should flourish or be abolished. Slavery was dividing the country, with a Civil War in the makings. It is long debated what the cause was, and therefore it is unknown which specific event caused the war. The many speeches given by citizens and politicians, the Compromise of 1850, and the Dred Scott Decision are largely considered to be the main causes of the Civil War.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Republicans formalized themselves in Congress and gained massive reputation during the 1856 presidential race with President James Buchanan (Democrat) won with 176 electoral votes and John C. Fremont (Republican) with only 114 electoral votes. Abraham Lincoln swore into the Republican party, but although he lost to Stephen A. Douglas for his Senate seat, he would later be sworn into the White House in 1860, defeating Stephen A. Douglas, the very mastermind who made the infamous Kansas-Nebraska act. But Douglas was not a racist of what many people…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Understand how the controversy of the Kansas-Nebraska Act led to the birth of the modern day Republican Party. The controversy of the Kansas-Nebraska Act that was passed on May 20, 1854, was regarding the practice of popular sovereignty which allowed the white people in the two territories to vote if they desired to allow slavery or abolish slavery. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was introduced by Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois who wanted to build a transcontinental railroad through Chicago. However, it violated the Missouri compromise which prohibited the practice of slavery on the Louisiana Purchase north of the latitude 36°30′. With the purpose of increasing votes and winning a majority, the north and south crossed the border into the two territories to vote for or against slavery. The northerners were called Free-Soilers and the southerners were called border ruffians.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Two years later, in 1854, President Franklin Pierce signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act into law. The Kansas-Nebraska Act mandated popular sovereignty, which allowed settlers of a territory to decide whether slavery would be allowed within a new state’s borders. This bill overturned the Missouri Compromise’s use of latitude as the boundary between slave and free territory. Conflicts arose which led to a period of violence, known as Bleeding Kansas. One event after another occurred, such as the Dred Scott Decision and John Brown taking armory at Harpers Ferry.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Douglas addressed Lincoln’s opinion in his speech. He was happy to get an answer from Lincoln about african americans citizenship and eligibility for office. (“Fourth Debate: Charleston, Illinois.” National Parks Service. Lincoln’s first speech, paragraph 1 and Douglas’ response speech, paragraph 1) Lincoln lost the election for the Senate seat of Illinois to Douglas but would later beat him in the Presidential Election of 1860.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays