What Is Nature Vs Nurture

One of the oldest arguments in the known history of psychology, which will simply not disappear, is the debate of Nature vs. Nurture. Each side of the argument has so many good points, that it can be really hard to decide whether a person’s development as a person is affected by an individual’s biological make up, or by the nurture of the environment someone is exposed to. For decades psychologies have debated between whether inherited genes or the environment has the greatest influence and affect on an individuals development, intelligence, abilities and behavior. This dispute has long been known as the nature verses nurture disagreement. Some scientist believe that it is firmly the genes we inherit that has the greatest affect on our ways …show more content…
In order for them to evaluate the influence of the environment on these traits; it is beneficial for them to analyze the traits of identical people. Scientist have long studied twins in order to better address the nature verses nurture question. Most researchers study twins who have grown up together, but the ideal case are identical twins that were separated at birth and brought up in separate environments. These kinds of studies are priceless in the debate of nature verses nurture because identical twins share the same exact DNA and the theory is that psychologists can interview and test the same person who has been raised in two different living environments. In a massive study performed by psychologists of over 303 sets of identical twins, a few separated at birth others not, showed that a lot of shared behavior and traits hinge on genetics and not on a person environment. This study suggests that some of the twins, who were raised separately didn’t have as large of a difference in personalities as one would have thought they would. This seems to imply that traits like bravery or skill in a certain active, is something you can’t just try people in; they have to be born with an essential aptitude to become