Argumentative Essay: The Debate Over The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
Koop 4 punishment is an “inhumane and impermissible device to foster vengeance.” The Pope said that he speaks the thoughts that the lord has given him, and so said, “every life is sacred, every human person is endowed with an inalienable dignity, and society can only benefit from the rehabilitation of those convicted of crimes.” The Pope doesn’t beat around the bush and gets straight to the point of subjects which are seen as taboo or impolite conversation, thusly sparking debate over the death penalty again.
In the current day and age the death row doesn’t make any logistical sense for the United States of America to continue to uphold. The death penalty costs more to maintain rather than a sentence to life, when taking into consideration the long legal process in order to come to a lawful sentence and fair trial of the accused. The government is using valuable resources to go through the long arduous process, such as judges, prosecutors, and other court devices. It is estimated that cases with the death penalty as a possibility costs approximately four times as more than those that don’t; New York estimated that it cost 1.8 million dollars just for the trial and initial appeal of one case alone. Per every capital defendant it’s ten times as many hours when compared to a non-capital defendant, with a ratio of one to eight thousand hours per
…show more content…
Hopefully the trend throughout American History (Evolution of Ideas) of the death penalty will be displayed by realizing the states are above the death penalty and one last metamorphosis will take place to put this debate to a temporary end that fits the current time and ideals. Such as how it is a fruitless practice logically since it drains the pockets of taxpayers and is considered an easier choice other life in prison, it causes a mental, emotional and physical tax on both the families of the accused

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This year the state of Nebraska abolished the use of the death penalty as a punishment for murder. The Nebraska legislature voted 30-19 to override the veto of Governor Pete Ricketts according to Berman (2015). A total of 19 states currently do not have the death penalty for reasons ranging from cost, the quality of the defense, and whether or not it is cruel and unusual punishment. The Eighth Amendment of the Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, punishment to include torture, barbarous punishments, degrading punishments not known to the common law, and punishments so disproportionate to the offense as to shock the general moral sense (U.S. Const. amend.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author’s point of this article was to give insight to the controversial view points on the death penalty, being in favor of those who deserve the capital punishment and opposed to those who do not deserve it, and argues that until the death penalty is not justified even without uncertainty to those that deserve it, and the moral deterrence is abolished from those that favor it, the argument against it will never…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Arguments against the death penalty can be simplified and classified into the categories of the brutality of the process, along with its morality, and the basic reason of why it is apart of the United States Judicial system. The argument in support of the death penalty has been prevalent throughout the decades and although the times have changed the reasons of why it is obligatory to the safety of this nation's citizens. When presented with the question concerning the necessity of the death penalty, an essay by Edward I. Koch titled "Death and Justice" comes to mind in support of capital punishment. Koch starts with two short examples of murderers who were on death row and executed in 1984.…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the process will then repeat. Medical personnel will assess the inmate each round but must first wait five minutes due to the scorching body temperature. The death penalty has been one of the most controversial topics in the entire criminal justice system. From the costs, religion, victim impact, inmate and staff psychological effects, botched executions, deterrence, all the way to those who have no opinion at all, the arguments have fallen into several different categories.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life is sacred. The majority of people in the state of Nebraska would agree to this. For this reason, taking the life of another has always been considered the most deplorable of crimes, one worthy of the harshest available punishment. Thus raises the question of the death penalty. The underlying question on this issue is if any kind of killing, regardless of reason, can be accepted.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around the vast globe, thousands of people are sentenced to death annually (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). Should the government execute people who commit heinous crimes? In 2014, in the United States alone, 35 people were ripped of their lives on the execution table (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). It is a common belief that the death penalty is a sufficient punishment for people who commit hostile and death-provoking crimes. Yet, what justice is served by the taking of another human life?…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Dieter explains, “The death penalty is much more expensive than it’s closest alternative – life imprisonment with no parole. Capital trials are longer and more expensive at every step than other murder trials. Pre-trial motions, expert eye witness investigations, jury selection, and the necessity for two trials – one on guilt and one on sentencing – make capital cases extremely costly, even before the appeals process begins. Guilty pleas are almost unheard of when the punishment is death. In addition, many of these trials result in life sentences rather than the death penalty, so the state pays the cost of life imprisonment on top of the expensive trial.”…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Data is unfortunately incomplete or difficult to comb through thoroughly to obtain an exact amount spent, but it appears that the expenses start to occur during the trial phase of capital litigation. Results for this are because of longer pre-trial periods, a longer and more intensive voir die process, longer trials, more time spent by attorneys preparing cases, more investigative and expert services, and an expensive penalty phase trial that does not occur at all in non-death penalty cases (Steiker and Steiker 405). Back in 2009 there were at least eleven state legislatures who considered bills to abolish the death penalty, all concerns were pointing at cost. Over time New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Illinois, and Connecticut have abolished the death penalty, and once again the high cost of maintaining a properly functioning death penalty system was the reason for the abolishment. National studies suggest that each additional capital trail causes an increase in county spending of more than two million dollar and theses costs are borne primarily by increasing taxes.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a subject that can be and has been debated for lengthy amounts of time. There are still many countries that perform executions today, but many of these countries differ from the United States greatly. While the death penalty has been used as early as eighteenth century B.C., there is no doubt that there are many factors that make the death penalty a questionable subject in the modern United States. The death penalty should not be utilized in the United States because it is costly, inhumane, and inaccurate.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty costs 2.16 million dollars per execution than the imprisonment of convicted murders for a lifetime (Jacqueline Brux). ii. Philip J Cook a Duke professor states that if the death penalty was repealed it would save the state 21 million dollars of cases in just the trial phase. II. Time a. Colorado i. In Colorado a study of the death penalty efficiency and functionality showed that it took six times the amount of days to pass one death penalty case than it did to pass one life-without-parole case.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Caleb Barwick 11 August 2017 Death Equals Peace Should murderers, rapists, and terrorists be let back in society after serving time in jail just to repeat the crimes they already committed? Well, with the death penalty this will not be a problem. With the death penalty that is not possible for that to happen. The death penalty is necessary for punishment because it can help cut down on terrorism, Americans prefer it as punishment, and it is needed for serious crimes.…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty The death penalty or Capital punishment is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a capital crime. However, since this punishment is established people are still wondering if the death penalty is a fair verdict. The first death penalty laws are established as far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon (in modern-day Iraq). The code implies that there are twenty-five crimes punishable by death in these times.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A study of Los Angeles County trials has shown that the average trial in which prosecutors demand the death penalty costs $1,898,323, while a murder trial where the death penalty is not sought comes in at $627,322. Death penalty is the most expensive because the constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for any capital cases. The process is required to make sure that innocent men and women are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and also to protect the innocent person from getting executed. According to George Sjostrom, “The cost of the death penalty is too high, both in dollars and in emotional pain,” (192). If we replace the death penalty with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, it will cost millions less and also ensures that the public is safe and protected and we will also eliminate the risk of…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adrianna Coffee Dr. Huck GSTR 110 Capital Punishment The death penalty should never be applied as a punishment to a person convicted of intentionally killing another person because the death penalty is a costly, unfair punishment that does not benefit society as a whole. What is the death penalty? The death penalty is defined as “the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime.” (Definition of Death Penalty in English) Since 1976 there have been over fourteen hundred executions in the United States.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays