Reasons For The Legalization Of The Death Penalty

Superior Essays
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, has been an ongoing ethical debate that has been traced to the beginning of the American colonies. The death penalty is an issue that has the United States quite divided. While there are many supporters of it, there is also a large amount in opposition. Currently, there are thirty-one states in which the death penalty is legal and nineteen states that have abolished it. Because of its controversial nature, it is important to further analyze the moral permissibility of the death penalty. I believe the death penalty should be legal throughout the nation for those who commit crimes deemed by society and government as deserving the infliction of death.
In this paper, I will defend the legalization of
…show more content…
According to the doctrine of Retributivism, this is the main justification of punishment. Society is justly ordered when each person receives what is due to him or her. Crime disturbs this just order; this is because the criminal takes from people their lives, peace, liberties and worldly goods in order to give him or her undeserved benefits. Therefore, theses deserved punishments, like the death penalty, protect society morally by resorting this just order by making the criminal pay a price equivalent to the harm he has done. Although the victim and the victim 's family cannot be restored to the status which preceded the murder, at least an execution brings closure to the murderer 's crime and ensures that the murderer will create no more victims. One example of a philosopher with strong beliefs for retribution is Immanuel Kant. Kant stated in his Metaphysics of …show more content…
Many may object based on the contention that this could result in innocent people executed. Since the reinstatement of the modern death penalty, 87 people have been freed from death row because they were later proven innocent. This is a demonstrated error rate of 1 innocent person for every 7 persons executed. Therefore, when the consequences are life and death, the thought that innocent people may be executed must be taken seriously. It is important to realize that some small margin for error does exist in the law system when it comes to capital punishment and the condemnation of those presumed to be guilty of crime. Therefore, in the future, if the use of the death penalty becomes legalized across the nation, one must take into consideration that this would result in the execution of more innocent

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The author’s point of this article was to give insight to the controversial view points on the death penalty, being in favor of those who deserve the capital punishment and opposed to those who do not deserve it, and argues that until the death penalty is not justified even without uncertainty to those that deserve it, and the moral deterrence is abolished from those that favor it, the argument against it will never…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation..…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Igor Primoratz Analysis

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The author is in agreement with death penalty and his defense of death penalty considers, "a life for a life". The author defends capital punishment against several objections, as follows: a right to life objection, a contradiction objection, lack of proportionality, an unpreventable error objection, and a bias and prejudice…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, some people are against it because they are finding out that innocent people have been executed. The critics’ concern with this has increased because of “ the new technologies, such as DNA testing, which shows that certain death-row inmates were not guilty…” (Funk & Wagnalls). In addition to the death penalty, non-supporters say the finances for capital punishment is several times greater than keeping someone in prison for life.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not all the cases with death sentences is right, “I don't want to put one innocent person to death to put 99 that are guilty to death,” said Gary Johnson (Johnson 1). In addition, the cost of it is also excessively expensive; therefore, this solution is not as good as its definition. The death penalty has its impacts to the criminal behavior of people as the result of reducing crime rates since it was re-instituted. One can say keep it but only for a symbol. Life is precious, and no one has the right to end other’s…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty in the United States has been a controversial issue for a very long time. The first time anyone ever opposed to the death penalty was in Colonial America. This was not too long after the first execution in the 1700’s. Over time, many countries have abolished the death penalty, but the United States is one of the few countries that still defends and supports the continued use. However, there is evidence that the attitudes about the death penalty is changing.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Introduction Multiple jurisdictions in the United States have death penalty statutes on their books. The stated purpose, of the death penalty, is the administration of justice. However, in the United States the death penalty is so divorced from any semblance of justice it has effectively become forced euthanasia.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been a social justice issue for several years. As many may know, the death penalty is the act of killing individuals. Although the death penalty is only to be distributed under certain circumstances and reserved for the worst crimes, that is not always the case. The death penalty has now raised an argument as to whether or not capital punishment is appropriate in a modern cultured society and also to questions about the justice of the trials and the dependability of the results. The variety of capital offences an offender may be put to death for various reasons, but many cases have been inappropriately dependent on the race and gender of the defendant.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The primary objective of retribution was, “not revenge but rather a return of the net balance of justice that has been upended through crime.” Capital Punishment was considered morally right because Americans believed in the eye for an eye concept. Proponents of the death penalty agree that it is an important tool to preserve law and order, to deter crime, and even to lessen the cost rather than life imprisonment. They claim that retribution is a way to show integrity to the victim, to help console-grieving families, and to ensure that the perpetrators of heinous crimes never have an opportunity to cause any future tragedy. On the other hand,…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is the most severe form of current legal punishment. The question that is hotly debated is if this form of legal punishment is just and necessary. Hugo Bedau argues that capital punishment is not ethically acceptable. On the other hand, Ernest Van Den Haag argues that this penalty is completely necessary. This paper will summarize both opinions and give two reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, both from a ethical point of view and from a practical perspective.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Death Penalty: The Price Society Pays The death penalty has been a topic of controversy for centuries, known for its inhumane brutality methods which have evolved over the years from lynching to gassing, electrocuting and now the lethal injection; it is in fact the sentencing of those who have committed a heinous crime. On the other hand, justice has been served when the death penalty has finally been executed on the prisoner, bringing a sense of retribution to those who have lost a loved one due to the crime committed. Although many people might think it is a working system, others land in the mixture of controversy for various reasons. Over the course of time, the death penalty has started to become obsolete and is slowly making a turnover…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past twenty years DNA evidence has come to light that has proven one hundred and fifty three people innocent of the crimes that they were put on death row for committing (Source D). This means that one hundred and fifty three people were almost murdered for crimes that they did not commit. The error that occurs in deciding whether or not a person should be put on death row or not is described in Source D as, “criminal-justice systems are flawed because they rely on human beings who can err through honest mistakes, greed, fraud, and other frailties of the flesh.” Human beings are not perfect and make many mistakes, yet they are trusted to make claims and decisions that are quite literally life or death. Source E pokes fun at this margin of error by presenting a cartoon, stating that less than a quarter of all death penalty cases have no error in them.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital Punishment and Ethical Theories. Many people in the United States have opposing views on Capital punishment, which is also known as the death penalty. The death penalty is the process in which, convicted criminals are executed by a governing authority. Many other countries have abolished capital punishment but the United States still allows for this to happen in certain states. The death penalty is used for most terrible crimes such as murder, treason, or espionage but mainly for murder.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is moral to uphold capital punishment as reverence for life itself. Indeed, a fact which suggests that, if anything, it may be the abolition of capital punishment which threatens to cheapen life. It is necessary to uphold justice and righteousness in the face of heinous evil, as life itself is sacred. ( Budziszewski, 2002) 2. Capital punishment is morally justified as the deterrent effect is significant, demonstrating that those who inflict grotesque crimes against others will be met with just retribution (typically the view of…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics