Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

Superior Essays
Today, society has in its mind what it is called “death penalty” for those who “deserve it.” According to Prejean Helen, in the article “the death of innocents,” death penalty is “the most severe form of corporal punishment as it requires law enforcement officers to kill (to cause the death of, to end the life) of the convicted offender” (114). Different views are heard about this subject all around the world. There is much debate in whether or not the death penalty should be abolished. There are many reasons why this penalty should be abolished, but this are the most important to be considered: “(1) The criminal justice system makes mistakes and the possibility of executing innocent people is both inherently wrong and morally reprehensible; …show more content…
Rehabilitating a criminal can make him be conscious of what he/she does. It gives these offenders the chance to begin a new life. It shapes their character, and shows them the way to gently treat their hard time situations without thinking of committing more crimes. Basically, i think that these psychological trauma pushes them to do what is wrong without being aware of the harm they 've …show more content…
The jurors have to evaluate and weigh the cases for both the defendant and the crime. While doing so, the investigators have to work very hard to get to know the defendant very well. They have to look at all the records the defendant has had during all his life and all his family background. Medical experts are also involved in all the case. They need to know if the defendant has any brain injuries caused by drugs or any disease. “A death penalty case needs all kind of experts in the case and that is why it takes many years. It could take from three to five years or even up to twenty years to end a single case.” ( Comiskey) During many years of investigations and data collection, in the state where the case is being questioned, millions of dollars have also been spent. “Recent studies show that ten death penalty trials in one state like California have cost from 1.8 million to 8.9 million dollars, while another state spent 5.5 million dollars seeking executions.” (Dieter) If the right thing is what the officials and government of a country want to do, then all of that money spent in executions would have been spent on more organizations that could help criminals to get a better life in the economy, or other kind of services; for instance, health care services, orphanages, and red cross society that can help the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The author’s point of this article was to give insight to the controversial view points on the death penalty, being in favor of those who deserve the capital punishment and opposed to those who do not deserve it, and argues that until the death penalty is not justified even without uncertainty to those that deserve it, and the moral deterrence is abolished from those that favor it, the argument against it will never…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the costs of the death penalty varies from state to state and even between different counties the taxpayers are still the sole providers to how the counties can even afford the option of pursuing the death penalty. The Dallas County District Attorney, Norman Kinne says, ‘”If you can be satisfied with putting a person in the penitentiary for the rest of his life…I think we have to be satisfied with that as opposed to spending $1 million to try and get them executed.”’ Kinne, makes a plausible point as he argues that although morally one might have stronger feelings about ‘eye for an eye’ and doing to one what they’ve done to others; in the long run it is more cost effective to just lock them away in the penitentiary than to waste taxpayer dollars on one trial that might not even end up with the outcome originally pursued. While most of the costs that accumulate from these kinds of cases are from the trials themselves, the process of appeals that the offenders get if they are sentenced the death penalty takes a serious toll on not only the financial aspect of the government, but the time it takes to go through that…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having individuals that can testify against the false avocation that the death penalty is used to punish those truly guilty for their crimes because it displays the extreme used in the wrong instance through its ruling on the innocent. Capital punishment’s inefficiency shines through the innocents’ conviction because how is providing the wrongful ruling suppose to deter future crime it only works to diminish the public’s trust in the judicial system and the validness of the death penalty ruling. Along with innocent men speaking out against capital punishment, comes the costly and time-consuming misconception that the act of evolving the death penalty has made it more humane even though despite popular belief “the death penalty has not become more civilized with the passage of time” (Stroud III, 381). We an human beings can’t continue to turn a blind eye towards the fact that no matter how the executors of the death penalty make it look it is still the blatant taking of another’s life whether it be with a rope, a chair or lethal doses of drugs. Another reason that both Stroud and myself see as being worth ending the option of capital punishment judicial decision is the appalling conditions that create “an environment conducive to depression and hopelessness” for its inmates (Stroud, 383).…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In today’s society the death penalty is still a very controversial issue where many individuals have different perspectives about it. Besides one of the most common arguments of the ethics of the death penalty, is its competency on crime. Some individuals perceive death penalty as an ineffective method to halt crime, while others believe that the death penalty does influence the rate of crime which helps to decrease it. The author, William J. Tucker, emphasizes on this specific issue and argument about the effectiveness of the death penalty in his article “Why the Death Penalty Works”. In this source Tucker describes and analyzes the practice of the death penalty throughout the years that displays its power.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not all the cases with death sentences is right, “I don't want to put one innocent person to death to put 99 that are guilty to death,” said Gary Johnson (Johnson 1). In addition, the cost of it is also excessively expensive; therefore, this solution is not as good as its definition. The death penalty has its impacts to the criminal behavior of people as the result of reducing crime rates since it was re-instituted. One can say keep it but only for a symbol. Life is precious, and no one has the right to end other’s…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That means, if the person kills others, they should killed too. Based on this concept, if the judge found the defendant guilty, they isolate the criminal forever from the society by depriving their life. Currently (October, 2014) the death sentence is practiced by 64 nations. This essay will…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty should be abolished in the United States because of its inhumaneness and lack of moral values. Many people in the United States are facing the punishment of death row. The death penalty is used to kill a person who has been convicted of inhumane crimes. Those who are for the death penalty think it is “ preventing serious harm to innocent people and a weighty reason for using a particular penalty (as in doing justice)”(Davis…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been a social justice issue for several years. As many may know, the death penalty is the act of killing individuals. Although the death penalty is only to be distributed under certain circumstances and reserved for the worst crimes, that is not always the case. The death penalty has now raised an argument as to whether or not capital punishment is appropriate in a modern cultured society and also to questions about the justice of the trials and the dependability of the results. The variety of capital offences an offender may be put to death for various reasons, but many cases have been inappropriately dependent on the race and gender of the defendant.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though many countries abolished the death penalty from their law, there is still quite a few that still practices the act of killing a person convicted of a crime. People have numerous different opinions relating to the issue of the death penalty that is given to a convict. While some may think that the death penalty is necessary for those who have committed a terrible crime, there are others who consider it as an immoral act that goes against the values of humanity. According to the author William Wood, in his text “Capital Punishment/Death Penalty,” there are generally two arguments that suggest capital punishment is an effective way to save lives and deter numerous crimes. Also, it plays a major role in giving justice to victims.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is the most severe form of current legal punishment. The question that is hotly debated is if this form of legal punishment is just and necessary. Hugo Bedau argues that capital punishment is not ethically acceptable. On the other hand, Ernest Van Den Haag argues that this penalty is completely necessary. This paper will summarize both opinions and give two reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, both from a ethical point of view and from a practical perspective.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Jennifer Sullivan, a crime reporter who won a 2010 Pulitzer Prize, the difference in trials involving the death penalty and not involving the death penalty, is $1.06 million, with cases with the death penalty being more expensive. That’s not even including years of retrials, appeals, and waiting. After all of those trials, sometimes the court finds a convict not guilty. One example of this is Ray Hinton, a man who was wrongly convicted in 1985 and proceeded to spend the next 3 decades on death row for murders he did not commit. In that particular case, the state spent close to $30 million to ruin an innocent man’s life.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been a solution to crimes constantly. Justice systems around the world have chosen to take the life of a criminal instead of sentencing them to life in prison. Capital punishment should be abolished because the justice system should not have the authority to take a criminal’s life. According to capital punishment laws, it is not justified for a criminal to take a life, but it is acceptable for a member of the justice system to take that criminal’s life.…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Death Penalty: The Price Society Pays The death penalty has been a topic of controversy for centuries, known for its inhumane brutality methods which have evolved over the years from lynching to gassing, electrocuting and now the lethal injection; it is in fact the sentencing of those who have committed a heinous crime. On the other hand, justice has been served when the death penalty has finally been executed on the prisoner, bringing a sense of retribution to those who have lost a loved one due to the crime committed. Although many people might think it is a working system, others land in the mixture of controversy for various reasons. Over the course of time, the death penalty has started to become obsolete and is slowly making a turnover…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death Penalty From the start of our nation, people have been granted the right to life, whether a person is to die or whether he is to live should not be decided by the state. We must abolish of the death penalty because people have been wrongly accused before, it has happened before and it could happen again. Picture this, what if this time a family member or loved one was wrongly sentenced to death, will you sit back and wait till that happens or will you take a stand today before it’s too late. Life without parole, on the books in most states, also prevents reoffending. It implies what it says, and spending whatever is left of your life bolted up, knowing you 'll never be free, is difficult.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment should be abolished because it is too expensive to retain, it is revenge not justice, and it 's possible for innocent people to be executed. The execution of human life should not be something we advocate here in the United States, it’s sad that as a nation we preach peace while still executing our citizens. The millions of dollars being wasted on executions could be spent improving our criminal justice system, and in doing so, improve our country. Not only is the death penalty a waste of our hard earned tax dollars, but it also puts innocent lives at risk. Mistreated or mishandled evidence can easily put an innocent life on death row.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics