Crimes and criminals are everywhere on this earth; and they are the ones who make people’s lives dark. We definitely don’t need and want them in our lives, and they must be eliminated. Some people do the crimes because they believe that they have no other way to make it through. Others do it just for fun. I am not saying that all of them must have the death penalty. A man stole food from a restaurant does not deserve the capital punishment. On the other hand, a serial killer who murder people for his personal interest or just doing it for fun, definitely deserves the death penalty. The definition of death penalty (capital punishment) is the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. According to the
…show more content…
There are some criminals who commit murders during self-defense or during time of passion. These criminals don’t deserve the death penalty. On the other hand, there are some criminals who don’t learn from the first lesson or others who just murder for fun; clearly they deserve the death penalty. What about criminals who commit murders and plead insanity? In my opinion, the criminals who plead insanity to get away with murders must have the death penalty because insanity implies an inability to react to the usual kind of incentives in the standard ways. If people, who have mental problems, are totally unresponsive to motivations, then their profits serve out no social need. I am not saying that all rationally disabled persons should be liable to death penalty since they are no great to the society. However, some people represent a great fatal danger to the communities and societies in such a remorseless way as seen in many cases. For example, Andrea Yates, who drowned her five children in the bathtub, plead insanity in a 2006 retrial and she is currently in a mental hospital. Where do we mark the line between rationally incapable and criminally crazy? At the point, when are they going to figure out how to continue the obligation regarding their activities and actions? I believe in giving a second chance, but there are criminals, who kill several people (serial killers), that don’t deserve a second chance. If a person does not …show more content…
So as to serve its need, it must be balanced, adjusted and made more successful and efficient. The justice framework has changed dramatically in the past fifty years with a specific end goal to ensure that the rightly denounced is conveyed to equity. I truly believe that capital punishment should not be annulled, as it guarantees the security of the society, conveys equity to the people who have suffered and the most important is it helps in disappearing criminals and crimes in our society. Capital punishment is important to keep the splendor of justice and open security sparkling splendidly on our
There are some criminals who commit murders during self-defense or during time of passion. These criminals don’t deserve the death penalty. On the other hand, there are some criminals who don’t learn from the first lesson or others who just murder for fun; clearly they deserve the death penalty. What about criminals who commit murders and plead insanity? In my opinion, the criminals who plead insanity to get away with murders must have the death penalty because insanity implies an inability to react to the usual kind of incentives in the standard ways. If people, who have mental problems, are totally unresponsive to motivations, then their profits serve out no social need. I am not saying that all rationally disabled persons should be liable to death penalty since they are no great to the society. However, some people represent a great fatal danger to the communities and societies in such a remorseless way as seen in many cases. For example, Andrea Yates, who drowned her five children in the bathtub, plead insanity in a 2006 retrial and she is currently in a mental hospital. Where do we mark the line between rationally incapable and criminally crazy? At the point, when are they going to figure out how to continue the obligation regarding their activities and actions? I believe in giving a second chance, but there are criminals, who kill several people (serial killers), that don’t deserve a second chance. If a person does not …show more content…
So as to serve its need, it must be balanced, adjusted and made more successful and efficient. The justice framework has changed dramatically in the past fifty years with a specific end goal to ensure that the rightly denounced is conveyed to equity. I truly believe that capital punishment should not be annulled, as it guarantees the security of the society, conveys equity to the people who have suffered and the most important is it helps in disappearing criminals and crimes in our society. Capital punishment is important to keep the splendor of justice and open security sparkling splendidly on our