187). Numerous peoples in today’s’ live are born with health issues that may cause their brain not to act in certain way which cannot be appropriate for other people. However, individuals have capacity to change in a ways and to wrongly sentence others’ issues. Criminals may be misunderstood by the act, however, sometimes, individuals are victimised against other acts which may harm them. Many major issues were sorted out after the act of Death Penalty has been abolished in UK; however, some controversial issues bring back the cause of death penalty. these issues were, Ronnie Biggs, Soham Girls, Ian Huntley and some others which were treated with death penalty cause because of the criminal acts proceeded by them (Alston & Goodman, 2008, p. …show more content…
Protocol No. 6 of European Convention on Human Rights addresses the importance of human rights standards in order to abolish death penalty (Snacken, 2006, p. 143). Additionally, the United Nation’s Second Optional Protocol towards International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights aims to eliminate the death penalty legislation that was created as per the goal of punishing criminals against the disastrous acts. Nowadays, Council of Europe wants to add new members who are obliged to follow Protocol No. 6 because this will in return promote the abolition of death penalty laws in Eastern Europe. For example, the Ukraine, a world’s leader of execution has admitted to enter the council after abiding the rule of following Protocol No 6. South African Nation’s Parliament has formally abolished to death penalty rule as a declared unconstitutional act followed by the Court. The other country’s Parliaments like Russian President Boris Yeltsin has also signed a treaty for commuting the death sentences (Lemkin, 2005, p. 1). In between 2000 to 2004, seven other countries have signed against the abolishment of death penalty for all crimes as well as for ordinary