The Death Penalty: An Effective Deterrent

Superior Essays
With regards to the question I believe that the death penalty is an effective deterrent. The death penalty has always been a topic that is debated thoroughly. The main theory is if the death penalty was favoured by a country is that it would dissuade people from carrying violent crimes if they will face the ultimate punishment and they know everyone is treated the same so they would go through the pain they caused to other people. Statistics had clearly proven this because in the UK between 1965 and 1969 when the death penalty was abolished the crime rate increased by a huge margin which was roughly around the region of 12.5%.
In my opinion I think it is unfair that murderers are often released from prison after only a few years in jail.
…show more content…
Statistical facts have also helped me make my judgment on the death penalty despite many reasons not to support it. In the year 2002, there were at minimum 1,526 people punished by the death penalty in 31 different countries around the world, and at minimum 3,248 people were sentenced to death in 67 different countries. Furthermore, 81 percent of the executions that took place were only in China, Iran, and the U.S.A. Those are only the facts for the year 2002 and it seems that the number of people punished and sentenced during this period of time was a very large and inconsiderate number. The death penalty is hugely helping narrowing down the population of inmates on death the row. There is not a single reason for them to think that this process of punishment is not helping. It seems as if it is not a very large number but if a person was to look at these statistical figures, it is actually a huge amount. It also helps in giving relief to families and even friends for the murders on their children, siblings or even friend which is done through the death penalty. The death penalty encounters and solves the overpopulating problem and this process is known as a compassion action. Most people that are paying tax are losing their tax money to the government or community councils to pay for the death row murderers, whilst the murderers should receive the death penalty which is better. These criminals should not be able to live whilst having all of their expenses paid for committing those serious crimes which have resulted in someone’s life ending when they haven’t done anything to deserve

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    From these numbers it is hard to see capital punishment as a crime deterrent. To further see the falsehood in capital punishment as a deterrence I searched Canada’s homicide rate. The homicide rate in Canada in 1975 (capital punishment abolished in 1976) was at 3.03 (victims per 100,000 people).…

    • 1370 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The research below is the discussion between two cases that involve the death penalty and the effects that the cases had toward the prison system. One case explains how the discussion of an armed robbery was taken to the supreme court and details information on how it is unconstitutional and violates our 8th and 14th amendment Gregg wanted to fight over how the death penalty was a cruel and unusual punishment to those who were sentenced to death. He managed to win the case which led to a hold on the death penalty. The second case explains how the death penalty is fair and constitutional towards those who have committed a crime involving murder. Furman also fought for this case explaining how those who have killed are basically acceptable to…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “I see no alternative but to conclude that capital punishment cannot be justified on the basis of its deterrent effect” (Marshall,1972). Proving that is really is not a deterrence. Although one example of where capital punishment could be seen as an effective possible deterrent would be in The District of Columbia which has no death penalty has a very high rate of homicides. There are other deterrents to crime other than Capital Punishment, there is incarceration, fines, moral prohibitions and many others. One study, found that the elevated levels of assurance of arrest on crime lowered the burglary rate in Canada (Zedlewski, 1983).…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Haag, a sociologist, wrote an extensive explanation on why the death penalty would help deter criminals from committing crimes. He has stated that the death penalty may be the only way to keep some people from committing crimes. He has said that this will help reduce the number of victims to crimes such as murder and rape. Haag also feels that if the punishments for a crime is raised then the desire to commit a crime is quickly diminished. I agree with Haag.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My opinion is people are scared of death, making the death penalty a great deterrence for murder. Life if jail just provides murderers with a place with shelter, food, and sometimes socialization, but is just a more confined way of living. Someone who lives on the street or in the cold for example may find this…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Death Penalty: Inhumane or Necessary Deterrent?” written by Euan McKirdy, several concepts surrounding the death penalty are discussed. McKirdy is a Digital News Producer who joined CNN in early 2014 and covers everything from politics, tech and the environment to sport and the arts. Before McKirdy started writing for CNN he wrote for a different publications and websites including Time, the BBC, the Wall Street Journal and Monocle. Throughout the article, McKirdy displays information for both sides of the controversial argument. He writes: Advocates say it is a powerful deterrent against serious crime, while others point to the problems -- and cost -- of keeping violent offenders in general prison populations.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In most of case, death penalty is more likely to discourage criminals to not to do bad things. According to law.jrank.org “The purpose of punishment is to discourage a person from committing a crime. Punishment is supposed to make criminal behavior less attractive and more risky.” For most of criminal, death penalty is a kind of warn for criminals, to make them fear, to decrease the inclination that criminals do serious crimes, indirectly keep the safety of ourselves as…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Very few countries similar to the United States employ the death penalty as punishment for murder. The list of other countries that also apply the death penalty includes China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Needless to say, we are not keeping good company when it comes to the practice. Support for the death penalty became popular during the 1990’s, when crime was on the rise and politicians, in an effort to appear tough on crime, embraced policies such as the three-strike rule and minimum sentencing. Since that time, however, the political climate has changed, and the death penalty has frequently come under fire from both liberals and conservatives alike.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty In Texas

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty does not act as a deterrent any better than other punishments. If it did, death penalty states would have lower rates of murder than non-death penalty states. This is not the case. The death penalty is hugely expensive.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Whilst some think that the death penalty is a fair sanction, it is an inequitable penance because many convicts on death row suffered from prejudiced trials, were mentally-ill, or were wrongfully accused. There have been hundreds of unjustified deaths from the death penalty. In conclusion, the death sentence is an unnecessary form of punishment that advocates the obliteration of human life. There is no proof whatsoever that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminals will follow all directions in jail so they can show the judge that they can be released at an earlier time. When this happens and the criminals do get released, most of the time they end up committing crimes again and are sent back to prison. Whereas, the death penalty there is no turning back and no way of getting out of it. The death penalty is taken very serious and that is why there are specific laws the court system has to follow in order to keep it legal. Although some people believe deterrence does not influence a criminal's actions for the reason that felons do not plan crimes based off their punishments, the death penalty is very effective at putting fear into criminals minds causing a drop in murder rates while the law is…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Cases

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This article shows that in places the death penalty has helped keep the murder rates down in their states or even county. Many people have a big mind on the death penalty but according to the article it's helping other families keep their loved ones alive. In studies it's shown that the death penalty has helped lower the murder rate by 20 percent annually. About 61 percent of Americans view the death penalty as morally acceptable, which leaves about 39 percent of americans who don't agree with the death penalty. More people agree with it then disagree in David Muehlhausen article he shows different studies in why we should keep the death…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Death Penalty: The Price Society Pays The death penalty has been a topic of controversy for centuries, known for its inhumane brutality methods which have evolved over the years from lynching to gassing, electrocuting and now the lethal injection; it is in fact the sentencing of those who have committed a heinous crime. On the other hand, justice has been served when the death penalty has finally been executed on the prisoner, bringing a sense of retribution to those who have lost a loved one due to the crime committed. Although many people might think it is a working system, others land in the mixture of controversy for various reasons. Over the course of time, the death penalty has started to become obsolete and is slowly making a turnover…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty has been a topic of interest recently, with many people arguing both sides. There are claims that it’s inhuman, that incident people are being killed, and that it cost the tax payers more money then a life sentence, but what about the other side of this complex argument? Is the death penalty really an cruel and painful process that cost taxpayers millions? The death penalty has been made out to be a horrible injustice to both the perpetrators and the tax payers, in reality it’s not. The death penalty is the best option for how to deal with monsters who would take another person’s life.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays