Supreme Court Functions

Improved Essays
At the head of our federal court system stands the United States Supreme Court. Many present-day US citizens possess minimal knowledge regarding the Supreme Court and how it functions. The Supreme Court serves as the ultimate authority in legal interpretation and its verdicts can only be altered by a constitutional amendment. The Court is in charge of making authoritative decisions concerning many of the most important issues of our time. The Court reviews decisions made by lower courts and its rulings are declared final following a majority vote by the justices. The United States Supreme Court consists of the Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices. However, the nine justices of the Supreme Court are not elected; they …show more content…
At times the Court must oppose the wishes of a majority group to comply with the principles and values mentioned in the Constitution. The Supreme Court is similar to a referee in sports, their decisions may not always seem “fair” to everyone as a whole, yet we learn to deal with them. During the past several decades, important decisions made by the Supreme Court have often led to democratic disputes. In the past, final verdicts by the Court were accepted by a majority of Americans, however these verdicts were critically opposed by some groups of minorities. One of the most famous Supreme Court cases, Roe v. Wade (1973) presented women with the right to make their own decision concerning abortion. Another well-known case, Engel v. Vitale (1962) prohibited the use of prayer in public schools. Certain cases like these have led critics to accuse the Court of abusing its power in the political system. Former attorney general Edwin Meese III is one of the most notable critics to accuse the court of exceeding its proper role in society. Meese insisted that the justices of the Supreme Court should be strictly guided by the words of the Constitution and the intentions of those who drafted them. When examining the Constitution, we must respect all parts of the document and remain true to the Constitution in its …show more content…
I believe that members of the Supreme Court should not be able to serve lifelong terms. Enforcing term limits would make it less likely for a Court to consist of very elderly justices whose opinions are far outdated for coping with current problems and needs of The United States. In addition, we should apply supplementary constitutional values with the intention of protecting the rights of individuals and groups that the framers never considered protecting. In conclusion, I believe that a strong judiciary branch is necessary to keep the President, Congress and state governments from ignoring the checks and balances that have been placed on their powers by the United States

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duel Court System

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the highest court in the United States, the Supreme Court has the lawful authority provided Article III of the U.S. Constitution created the Supreme Court and “authorized Congress to pass laws establishing a system of lower courts. In the federal court system’s present form, 94 district level trial courts and 13 courts of appeals sit below the Supreme Court.” This means that regardless of status of status, the Supreme Court has the final decision. The Plethora of Court…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the Supreme Court didn't have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws, then who would? Without the supreme court, the other two branches will be overpowering. The United States can’t have a workable system of the government without the judicial branch. The Judicial branch act as a tiebreaker for the legislative branch and executive branch. And those three are the reason to prevent the government from overpower.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The power is balanced by the fact that the Supreme Court members are appointed by the president and those appointments have to be approved by Congress. This process is affective but it is hard to amend because America has only one constitution. This is known as the checks and balances systems; this is the ways the Framers ensure that the power will not completely fall into the hands of one government, that no branch has the ultimate power over the other two. For example, in our current law, the congress makes the law, the president has the power the power to approve it, do nothing, or veto it; the congress ca again overrides it by 1/3 of majority vote. The Supreme court has the power to review the constitutionality of the…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Originalism v. Judicial Activism Throughout the history of the United States of America, there has always been different controversies among our Constitution. To the best of their abilities the Supreme Court of the United States has resolved each of these cases in a manner relating to interpreting the Constitution. Judicial activism and judicial restraint have been at odds since the adoption of our Constitution in 1787. This continues to this time where the Supreme Court is still ruling on cases that affect our everyday lives.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are currently 9 Supreme Court Justices serving that oversee the major cases in America. They are chosen by the President and serve until either; death, retirement or impeachment. If there is no proof of harm then they do not try the case. There must be solid evidence and an important case for it to be heard by the Supreme Court. The federal courts interpret the law and the Constitution and make rulings accordingly.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court should be able to overturn unconstitutional laws that Congress has passed. There are many reasons to give the Supreme Court this power, first we need someone to enforce the fact that no law should violate the Constitution. Next, it helps balance the three branches of government, and lastly the Constitution puts judicial power into the Supreme Court and inferior courts. This power will stop substandard laws from getting passed, and will protect the structure of our government that is extremely based on the Constitution.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While the ideal example of a democracy places the decisions of government in citizen’s hands, the United States rarely does as such. For example, the Supreme Court, while influenced by public approval and public opinion, isolates itself from the media and public in two specific ways. Its Justices, appointed by the president, are indirect methods for people to get what they want from the highest branch of the Judiciary Branch. Similar to the method and processes used to elect a president through the Electoral College, the Supreme Court works in a way that places the power of the government in educated individuals’ hands as opposed to the direct power of votes in an election for a state governor. It indirectly allows people to influence Court…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Supreme Court justices do have personal views. They are appointed through a political process. Observers naturally must ask how great a role their political views actually play. Some scholars argue that the justices’ political preferences play a large role, essentially dictating their decisions in many cases. They point to the fact that justices appointed by conservative presidents tend to vote in a conservative fashion and those appointed by liberal presidents vote the opposite way.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court has made a lot of important decisions that impact the lives of United States citizens every day. If I would have to summarize what I have learned from the United States Government class in very few words, it would have to be that the justice system was built to be fair and just for everyone and that the government structure was framed to be as effective as it can be. Even though history has shown more than once that the system can be exploited and government corrupt, like any system and governing body can, it still comes to show that it is effective and was put in place with the people in mind. There was a point in time where the two collided and one of the more important rulings of the Supreme Court has been made. I am talking…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proper Interpretation (Meese) The interpretation of the Constitution has been a controversial issue between people in the government. In A Jurisprudence of Original Intention by Edwin Meese III, Meese provides an article with the intention of telling his audience the importance of interpreting the Constitution properly. Meese highlights the idea that all courts in the United States have to base their decisions strictly from the Constitution. It is evident that Meese wants a strict interpretation of the Constitution.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court’s Ability to Deem Laws Unconstitutional I, an American born and raised, fully support and and justify the Supreme Court’s power to overturn unconstitutional laws. I believe judicial review is vital to the protection of citizen’s natural and legal rights, and without the ability to overturn said unconstitutional laws our country could face utter corruption. For the sake of protecting our country’s citizens it is imperative that unconstitutional laws are not passed, thus preventing the jeopardization of our country’s freedom. America, known to all as the land of the free, home of the brave, but before all this was possible our liberties and freedoms were controlled by the British.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The founding fathers of the Constitution did not want the government to have too much power in any one agency, so they divided the government into the executive, legislative and judicial branch to avoid tyranny. The Supreme Court is the authority of the judicial branch and the highest of all courts, which can examine the laws and decisions made by Congress and declares them unconstitutional. This does not mean that the Supreme Court has unlimited power because each branch partakes in checks and balance in providing a government of the people. The role of the Supreme Court is to not only to ensure the people equal justice under the Constitution but to also provide as checks and balance within the government. Since the Constitution is complex,…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays