Julius Caesar Alan Berg Analysis

Improved Essays
Mark Twain once said, “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man who lives fully is prepared to die at any time”(Death Quotes, Brainy Quotes). Julius Caesar and Alan Berg both stared death in the face more than one time and eventually they both paid for it. Alan Berg and Julius Caesar were both very influential people with radical ideas that not everyone agreed with. The two men lived very different lifestyles and had very different views on the world but, both of the men’s radical ideas led to their assassination.
Alan Berg was shot multiple times out of cold blood on June 18, 1984. Berg became a target when he offended a man from the white supremacist group The Order(Alan Berg, Wikipedia). The Order already did not like Berg
…show more content…
What made Caesar a target was his passion to be made King (The Life of Caesar). He was not well liked by those around him because of his arrogant attitude and he was too cocky to see anything in front of his eyes. The men who conspired against Julius Caesar were ironically his own friends, for the most part. Cassius, Decius, his best friend Brutus and a few other men saw to the killing of Caesar. The assassins were able to accomplish their objective by being very sneaky. Decius purposely had a long conversation with Caesar, allowing the other to get into position. Caesar then made his way into the building where the senate would have their meetings. He figured he was there to discuss some political situation. The conspirators circled around his chair, some behind the chair and some in front of the chair. The first stab was made after Tillius Cimber motioned for it to happen (The Life of Caesar). The last stab on Caesar was by his best friend Brutus. That was the final blow in Caesar’s life. The assassins wanted to create a new, free spot to rule Rome. They also wanted to be viewed as heroes by the general of Rome. Killing Caesar really backfired on the conspirators. Marc Antony took over as the leader of Rome and practically exiled all of the conspirators. He eventually killed all of them as well. Antony created a Civil War in Rome and Octavius Caesar became emperor after all had settled

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Marcus Brutus has the tragic flaw of having poor judgment, because he so easily trusts people, such as the conspirators consequently causing Marcus to be ignorant and blind to the fact that they were planning to kill Caesar, not to better the government but for personal gain. If Marcus Brutus, would not have as much pride and patriotism for Rome then, he would not have decided to join and trust the conspirators in their quest to kill Caesar. With all of his pride for the democracy, he puts his country over his friends and family. He honestly suspected that Caesar would do harm to Rome’s new republic. So he went along with the conspiracy to assassinate Caesar.…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Julius Caesar Cruel

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The war then started, the two pairs fighting against each other. They thought it was going to be a fair way to find a new leader, but all in all, it just put them right back where they started. Cassius and Brutus were killed in battle, leaving Antony, with Octavius by his side, in charge once again. “Free from bondage you are in, Messala; the conquerors can but make a fire of him for Brutus only overcame himself, and no man else hath honor by his death.” (pg. 911).…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Marcus Brutus’ ancestry is shown when the play states “There was a Brutus once that would have brooked Th’ eternal devil keep his state in Rome as easily as a king” (I.ii.159-161). Next Brutus suffers from a catastrophe which takes part in making him a tragic hero. The catastrophe Brutus suffers from is when he realizes that the other conspirators did not kill Caesar for the right reasons and that such an honorable person put himself with such bad people. Brutus was great friends with Caesar and he loved him but Brutus felt that he was compelled to kill him because that was what was going to be the best for Rome and its government. For example Brutus states “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (III.ii.21-22).…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case Brutus was definitely not a noble Roman in a couple different ways. First of all, Brutus turned his back on Caesar, one of his best friends because he thought that Caesar was going to be ambitious and take the crown of Rome. In fact, Brutus is basically the one who was the most ambitious and wanting to have this type of power in his hands. Brutus was not a noble Roman at all. On the other hand, many would believe that Brutus is a noble Roman because he said he killed Caesar, his best friend to help the people of Rome.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus wanted to keep Rome a democracy, something that his ancestors had established. Caesar could do a lot with his power as king and Brutus was worried with the outcome of that. So Brutus and the conspirators kill Caesar, leaving chaos and nobody in rule. This all ends with a war and Brutus being killed. After Brutus is killed, everyone follows Mark Antony which ends with a monarchy.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The primary example of this manipulation in Julius Caesar is Brutus. Brutus is considered to be very noble by almost everyone in the play. Brutus wants to keep this image, and therefore he tries to convince himself that killing Caesar is the right thing to do. Caesar is his friend and it is very hard for Brutus to convince himself, but in the end with some help, he thinks that “it must be by [Caesar’s] death” that the Republic of Rome is saved (2.1.10). This manipulation causes Brutus to kill Caesar, thinking that Caesar is too ambitious, even though Caesar has not done much to show his ambition.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By saying that, Cassius reminded Brutus that he is noble and the people of Rome look up to, not only Caesar, but him as well. He made Brutus aware of how much he meant to Rome and that some of the people wanted him as a leader too. His tragic flaw is poor judgement, and he is easily manipulated into doing things that might not be right. When he made his decision to kill Caesar he did not really want to do it, but the conspirators quickly and easily changed his mind. The people of Rome were shocked when Brutus and the conspirators took action and killed Caesar.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not everything he did for a reason had a good outcome. Some of the things he did had a negative outcome like letting antony live caused a war between Marcus Brutus and Caius Cassius against Octavius and Marc Antony. Another bad choice was leaving portia behind, that led to her killing herself. Or letting Antony speak at the funeral, which Antony told the people of Rome about the conspirators and what they did. But Marcus Brutus killed Julius Caesar because he wanted a democracy in Rome.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That same act of Caesar crossing the rubicon started a gigantic chain of horrible deaths and uncontrollable riots. Also this led to the fall of Rome itself. So if Caesar really wanted what was best for Rome, maybe coming back alone and taking an honorable death wouldn't have been such a horrible idea. In conclusion, no matter what path Caesar had taken, it led to death. The Roman Senate had checkmated him.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Right before he commits suicide he says, “Caesar, now be still; I kill 'd not thee with half so good a will,” (V.v.50-51). Brutus means that he is killing himself with only half as good intentions, as what he killed Caesar with. He is indirectly telling Caesar that he might have still been a conspirator and killed him, but his intentions were honest, just, and pure. Even though Brutus’ actions should have led Rome to keeping a democracy, the conspirators intentions mixed with his caused Rome to instead be led into having an emperor (dictator) and led to the deaths of most of the conspirators and to the death of Shakespeare 's tragic hero, Marcus…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays