Their standpoints on morals and laws were completely different to the modern-day. Religion in that era was a one-way streak, it was only acceptable to believe in the Greek Gods. One must obey the Gods or else they have betrayed everyone and everything around them. Laws were different. There was a ‘council’ but civilians were able to convict another of a crime. Once incriminated they would get sentenced to discuss their punishment with the council. This meant that if one upset a neighbor, for instance, they could convict that person of some sort of crime. In this case, this is what happened to Socrates. Socrates was a rather poor man, he had no ambition to become rich. He was happy with his lifestyle and believed in the world of the wiser. “What was the meaning of life?” “Is there something further out there than what we already have before us?” Questions that people have yet to answer, but does not stop them from finding the …show more content…
If a person’s actions can positively affect the lives of others, then they should make a change. Even if it might break some sort of law, such with the instance with West and how he breaks the law. People do not get anywhere in life by accepting what others have told them. It takes that one person to make a real difference. Everyone has different opinions and beliefs. One cannot say that they do not matter, but rather try accepting their point of view. There have been many great leaders that have broken the law. People with their willpower, wisdom, and intellect, can make a difference. Although there are flaws in the law but that ought not to be the reason a person does not go after their dreams. People should support others to find their souls like Socrates would