The Dark Side Of Science Analysis

Improved Essays
In Heather E. Douglas’s essay “The Dark Side of Science”, she mentioned that scientists should be responsible for their discoveries that are used to the awful advantages that they could be used for. Scientist who makes these discoveries may know what they can endure. Scientist usually knows how there discovers will end up, but mostly they do not think of the reproductions that could happen if they ended up being used for the wrong intended purposes for that particular discovery. Douglas writes how it should be one sided and scientist should be held accountable for their actions, maybe they need to look at the bigger picture before they decide to point fingers at who should be responsible for what. Douglas had some good points, but …show more content…
The world will always have the mentally unbalanced, the delusional, the vicious, and the sociopathic members of society, some of whom will also be intelligent enough to use the results of science” (126) had more to say about the negative than the positive parts of science, she mentions that the DNA sequence that it is intended for the medical practice can also when placed in the wrong hands be the stepping stone for building pathogens from scratch. Which in many ways all together might not be the intentions from the start, scientists need to account for such possibilities when such high precision information is released to the public. Especially in the case that intended to use weapons that meant to cause harm. This type of research is usually backed up by government, the researchers are not clear of personal responsibility. Directly involving themselves in the development and being fully aware of the intended applications leaves the researcher morally obligated to take responsibility for the repercussions. Douglas states that there should be stricter regulations to assist in the development in research to a more stable controlled path to help direct these …show more content…
Science will always be around and the curiosity will always kill the cat so to speak, technology will always change along with all sorts of scientific discoveries.
As douglas states, “Einstein was not responsible for the use of his E=mc2 equation to build an atomic bomb and its use in wartime, though the scientists at Los Alamos were” (125). When someone behind the wheel of a car and then causes an accident do we blame the car manufacturer or the person? We blame the person for being irresponsible and driving while intoxicated. So why should a researcher be responsible for the things that could not be avoided when certain things can get in the wrong hand.
Einstein might have came up with the equation but I highly doubt he knew what the negative outcomes could all be when he made his discovery. This passage, unreasonably shares blame creation and or operation of atomic weapons. This text also seems to highlight the more dangerous outcomes of research, the idea of creating stricter regulations is just going to hurt the public as a whole. Restricting this type of information can limit the public to learn what is new coming out. The thought of trying to restrict information seems like the government does not want anyone knowing what is going on in the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Her pleas are simplistic and are backed by factual evidence. She undercuts the widely accepted belief that scientific innovation is good. She challenges the ethics behind “dark science” through deductive reasoning. This is evident as she declares, “Some have argued that the answer to this question is no—that it is not researcher 's’ responsibility how science gets used in society. But that is sophistry” (Douglas 124).…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the end, people have to think whether it does more good than bad, should be allowed or not, and if allowed should it be controlled or not. Since the technology is very new and scientists do not have full knowledge of this technology it should be controlled. Genetic engineering is capable of helping the whole world in multiple ways but just like anything else it can also be too powerful and get out of control. The government should allow it for the simple fact that it has the power to get rid of diseases, however genetic engineering should be regulated. Not everything scientists have done with it for is useful to humans.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Vaccines: Article Analysis

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is also unethical to let a human die in a trial of a new drug, but they are not comparable because one was intentional and the other accidental. The author is trying to use ethos and pathos to make you question the motives and the testing of vaccines. Perkins is also trying to make readers feel sympathy for those who suffer from vaccination testing, and use that sympathy to arise anger towards corporations. The…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ESCR (embryonic stem cell research) is argued to be a motive that is unfair as well as the debate on whether it should be declared illegal due to the possible death, pain and unfair treatment to all involved ("Ten Problems with Embryonic Stem Cell Research."). It explains the reasons and beliefs of the other party. An additional concern of the opposing part is that fact that, "Humans should not be trying to play God and some argue that stem cell research in the far future can lead to knowledge on how to clone humans. It is hard to say whether this is true, but we have seen devastating consequences of other research-programs, even with good intentions, such as nuclear research (Stem Cell Research-Pros and Cons). The quote explains the human fear behind the matter of stem cell research.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through such structured methodology, a concept becomes a theory, and a theory can then become a law. Within the natural sciences, skepticism is crucial to negate researcher bias. Certain scientists may not recognize errors in their own experiments, but another person may easily perceive such faults. Through additional observation, other scientists can largely falsify theories and further scientific knowledge. For example, falsification led to the direct acceptance of the Bohr…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Human Cloning Possible

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Instead of creating clones that have to experience the effects of the imperfections, scientists should focus more on improving the lives of people by using other ways that does not include ethics or does not cause harm to others. These scientists are making the clones suffer through unneeded complications. Head states in the article, “Should human cloning be banned?”, “Scientists generally agree that it would be irresponsible to clone a human being until cloning has been perfected, given that the cloned human would probably face serious, and ultimately terminal, health issues.” It is impetuous for scientists to continue cloning because the babies that were made are alive and have their own feelings. They should not be forced to live with health issues their entire life because of our imperfect experiments. Scientists only want to create clones in order to have better organ donors.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human behavior is for to complex, and cannot be understood numerically. Still, modern research like The Human Genome Project aim is to identify behavior by looking at specific chromosomes. This could be harmful to society because it could allow us to eradicate genes that we view as less desirable. When we put this into perspective it begins to sound eerily similar to unthinkable mistakes made in the…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some feel that the cloning of embryos, is morally repugnant and may feel that the idea of cloning humans is “playing God” according to “What are the Pros and Cons of Cloning?” So, if too many people are conflicted based on a moral stance, it will create too much turmoil in the science community. Considering how difficult it is to create clones, scientist cannot afford to get their clones rejected solely based on morale. Others also fear that people could decide to genetically engineer super kids, according to “What are the Pros and…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Designer Babies Analysis

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It is within human nature to strive for perfection. To be the best we can be, and now humans are on the brink of discovering how to finally reach this “perfection” we desire through genetically modifying fetuses or in other words creating a designer baby. However, should we really turn to designer babies in our search for perfection? In my opinion I do not believe we should because there are so many unforeseen consequences of designer babies that we cannot comprehend. We may come across bacteria that were originally harmless but due to the genetic engineering it became pathogenic to humans.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    GMO’s, or genetically modified organisms, are animals that have their genes manipulated in a laboratory. These genes are changed by chemicals to bring some good effects on the people but may also bring some bad ones. There are lots of controversies and debates in society about how dangerous GMOs are even after some research was conducted and it showed that there use was safe. This paper is intended to help give information about the good and bad effects of GMO’s in society and help us make a better decision on whether this should stay in society or be eliminated. GMO’s are modified to enhance food to get better quality as well as quantity from them.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays