Nuclear Energy Cost Essay

Superior Essays
Nuclear power comprises 20% of the world’s energy production. No other form of energy production runs the risk of being taken over by terrorists, or exploding and killing millions of people within a 50 mile radius (Nuclear Power Plants). The United States has 121 government sanctioned nuclear energy power plants in its borders that each cost extreme amounts to build and run. With the U.S. being nearly twenty trillion dollars in debt, it would be wise to stop all further development of nuclear energy.
The process of harvesting uranium is harmful to the environment as an energy source. When uranium is mined radioactivity is released into the environment. People can ingest the uranium, inhale it via dust, or come into direct contact with it.
…show more content…
Nuclear reactors cost billions of dollars to build. One author wrote that, “The current theoretical overnight cost of constructing a nuclear power plant is about 2 to 2.5 billion dollars for a plant with two conventional reactors and generating about 2 gigawatts – a nominally sized plant (What Does It Cost to Build a Nuclear Plant? What Could It Cost?).” While it’s somewhat true that the cost of running a nuclear plant is cheap, only after construction is completed and yearly licenses are paid for is that statement really true. “However, when capital costs of nuclear energy is examined, it becomes apparent that current policies are far from generous to any potential plant construction,” says one author (What Does It Cost to Build a Nuclear Plant? What Could It Cost?). With that in mind, it’s not wise or ultimately profitable for the government to continue investing in nuclear power as a viable energy source.
Another cost related to nuclear energy is uranium importation. PSR wrote that “assertions that nuclear power can lead us to energy independence are incorrect. In 2007, more than 90% of the uranium used in nuclear power reactors was imported.” Uranium currently is estimated to cost about 50 dollars per pound, not including transportation costs and mining fees. Multiply that number by several thousand pounds and the cost and dependence on foreign countries is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As a worker at “Top Coal Australia”, I absolutely believe that we must not use uranium as an energy source. Many people believe that uranium is a clean and a good source of energy. It is most certainly not. It is dangerous and if there is a radioactive spill, many people can be fatally injured or even killed. Uranium is not an easy source to mine and it is extremely harmful to the air while transporting it to and from.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Has the world grown so dependent upon nuclear power energy that it ignores the price tag? Power reaped from nuclear energy by heating and pressuring water is known as nuclear power. Controversies surrounding nuclear power come in various forms, however, the financial aspect is grand. In their recent work, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), a nonprofit organization composed of numerous scientists, discovered actual costs of implementing nuclear power as an energy source. Within the article Is Nuclear Power Our Energy Future, Or in a Death Spiral?, author Dave Levitan paraphrases UCS's findings as, "the price tag for a new nuclear power plant jumped from between US$2 billion and US$4 billion in 2002 all the way [to] US$9 billion in 2008.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, nuclear power makes up about 20% of the United States’ total energy output. While this may seem miniscule, that is every 5th house you check is running completely on nuclear power. Whether or not nuclear power is best for our economy…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans, and the rest of the world, should switch to nuclear power because it produces great amounts of energy with little to no waste, is constantly available and reusable, and nuclear energy is safe. Nuclear energy provides great amounts of energy with very little amounts of nuclear material. In the documentary “Pandora’s Promise” Leonard Koch(died on the fifteenth of may in 2015) said that “one pound of uranium, which is about the size of my fingertip, would produce the same amount of energy as five thousand barrels of oil.” Now in one forty-two gallon barrel of oil there is five point eight million btu(british thermal units), one btu would raise a pot of water one degree. Multiply five point eight million by five thousand, and you get…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The primary audience of this article is subscribers to The Futurist magazine. More specifically it is aimed towards the people who are interested in learning more about the future of nuclear power. This group may encompass anyone ranging from a middle-aged garbage man to a high school teenager or even a grandpa looking out for the generations behind him. A person who wants to know more than the media portrays will read this article. The authors focus mainly on the benefits of nuclear power, but they also bring in the counterarguments to strengthen their argument.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear power is one of the cheapest forms of energy compared to other sources such as oil and coal. According to studies done by professor Nolan E, Hertel, professor of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology, the cost of producing nuclear energy as of 2007 was 1.7 cents per kilowatt hour compared to 2.4 cents for coal, 6.7 cents for natural gas, and 10.2 cents for oil. However does this affordability come at a cost? According to Max Schulz at the center for Energy Policy and the Environment at the Manhattan Institute, there has not been a single accident or fatality involving exposure or harm at a nuclear power plant since the start of their operations in the United States (MI). When compared to the average of 200 accidental deaths per year at coal and natural gas powered plants, not including respiratory issues, its record is impeccable (Lehr).…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saying “No” to Nuclear Power As of 2003, 49,000 metric tons of nuclear waste has been produced in the United States alone. Every day, more and more of this incredibly dangerous substance is released into our planet’s soil. Nuclear power seems like a good idea on the surface, but obviously, it is not the answer. Nuclear power is too dangerous, too expensive, and unable to be contained, therefore it should not be the world’s primary source of energy.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although there are many benefits to using this energy source and although is it not widely adopted in the United States it is the third biggest source of electricity in the country. For instance, only about 20% of energy in the United states is generated by the use of nuclear plants (Hyndman 335). It is known that one of the benefits of nuclear energy is the fact that it is environmentally friendly, but there is also a number of disadvantages that come with it, which is why a lot of individuals do not think it is the best resolution and they therefore stick to the burning of fossil fuels. Compared to the burning of fossil fuels, using nuclear energy to manufacture electricity is much costlier. In Natural Disasters & Hazards it says that, “It costs about 10 cents per kilowatt-hour with the use of nuclear energy, as opposed to the cost of using natural gas which is only about 4 cents per kilowatt-hour” (Hyndman 334).…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless of the various definitions of renewable energy, nuclear energy meets every reasonable criterion for sustainability, which is the primary concern of countries. The United States should use nuclear energy for three primary reasons: first, it produces more cost effective energy than any other non-renewable resource. Second there is no release of greenhouse gasses which contribute to global warming, and finally nuclear energy is the most reliable source of power in the world today. Nuclear power produces electricity that is less expensive than coal and natural gas while providing more energy for use. The Energy Informative Organization supports this claim when the author states, “Generating electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Controversy

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1973, the United States canceled their order for reactors due to economic reasons. The costs of energy was rising and inflation which led to the demand for global electricity to decrease. The United States in 1978 started to transition from the energy market to the natural gas market. As the people started to vote against nuclear power, it was not until the 1990s that the energy market’s supply and demand began to lag in Western Countries. The introduction of nuclear power to the present time has developed many problems throughout its seventh years of being available to the world.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Originally published as "Return to Nuclear," San Diego Union-Tribune, 2 Mar. 2001. McGregor, Douglas S. "The Use of Nuclear Power Should Be Increased. " Global Resources, edited by Helen Cothran, Greenhaven Press, 2004. Opposing Viewpoints.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kazakhstan, a country in central Asia, currently has the most access to uranium right now, with about 23,000 metric tonnes, which is roughly equivalent to 50 million pounds (Nuclear Power). This may seem like a large amount, but at the rate that it is being used, this supply will only last about 200 years, if not…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the company builds the plant, they need to transport and store the radioactive waste they produce which is quite expensive. The company is required to dismantle the nuclear power plant once 50 years of service are up. In other words, you are throwing away all of the hard work, time, and money you put into building the power plant. It is highly difficult to store radioactive waste. In order for it to be in a safe place where no one can be harmed by it, the radioactive waste has to be stored up to 5,000 meters below ground level.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is unlike nuclear which is getting cheaper and cheaper and is producing more emissions. That is why nuclear should be the next big energy source for the future it is very reliable. The only bad thing about nuclear is that it can turn into a disaster when not maintained right, nuclear meltdowns have occurred a few times in the history but one really sticks out on peoples mind Chernobyl. This nuclear meltdown caused the single worst eco destruction in history. This was due to the explosions in one of the chambers in the reactor.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear power has been under debate for many years; with issues such as environmental impact, safety, cost, waste management, and efficiency, the cons clearly outweigh the pros. Nuclear power plants have been supplying electricity to the population for nearly 60 years, but all things must come to an end as better options emerge and humanity develops as a species. It 's only natural for things to become outdated, or be replaced by better options as they become available. Nuclear power is a source of energy, created through a reaction when a uranium atom is split, releasing heat that is used to produce electricity. It was initially used as an alternative to coal, as coal-burning facilities were becoming a hazard to the environment.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays