When some imagine a world dominated by The National Socialist party of Germany, they imagine a horrible dystopian future split into three tripartite factions by the Berlin-Rome-Tokyo Axis. In this imaginary world, all resistance to the Nazi regime has been quelled and replaced with Hitler 's Dystopia, where all non-aryans have been eradicated or enslaved and The Third Reich now reigns supreme. The reality of an Axis victory is far more complex. While this alternate fascist dominated world would be oppressive to various ethnic and religious groups, political opposition, and the mentally ill, the intricacy of a world where Nazism is paramount, is far more than just a German dominated Earth. The Slavs would be expelled over the Urals into Siberia,
…show more content…
Once again the Nazi Party reframed from demonstrating a blatant malice towards Slavic Europe. When it was time for Hitler to make an ally out of a Slavic nation he would justify his alliance insisting the countrymen in question were Slavicized Germans, Turks, Albanians, or Greeks. In some instances Hitler did truly believe that certain Slavs were indeed what he claimed them to be. In one instance he stated “The idea that Bulgarians are Slavs is nonsense, Bulgarians are Turkoman” and also “The Croats are certainly more Germanic than Slav”. His regard to these peoples as racially pure, did not shake him from the position that their cultures had been tainted and they had become barbaric and atavistic hill folk who clutched onto their archaic customs and traditions and refused to modernize. Hitler however remained neutral in his position towards Ukrainians and Belorussians, in fear that Ukrainian and Belorussian insurgencies fighting against the Soviets would become partisans. His true intentions in order to fulfill Lebensraum was to expel all slavs over the Urals and into Western Siberia, an area which many anthropologists of his time considered to be the Proto-Slavic domain. Poles and Russians were in the opinion of Hitler, the largest threat and was blunt in referring to them as subhumans. Hitler wanted unapproved Slavic peoples such as Poles, Serbs, Russians, …show more content…
Hitler would speak of the entire post-war continent as if it was a personal vacation resort, in one instance he stated “The beauties of the Crimea, which we shall make accessible by means of an autobahn—for us Germans, that will be our Riviera. Crete is scorching and dry. Cyprus would be lovely, but we can reach the Crimea by road. Along that road lies Kiev! And Croatia, too, a tourists ' paradise for us. I expect that after the war there will be a great upsurge of rejoicing.” German allies would more than likely adopt a hostile foreign policy towards The Reich, even during the war “allies” of The Reich only took up an alliance to evade an invasion and vassalization. For example, King Boris III of Bulgaria, found Hitler to be a “buffoon” which was more than common amongst other allies of Hitler who simply found Nazi diplomacy to be far too demanding and assertive. In post war America a rebellious movement swept the country in the 50s and 60s that incorporated counterculture of arts and morals that conflicted with the previously set bedrock of American culture. In a victorious Germany, a cultural revolution would also occur, but in a much more reversed direction. In this Germany their would be a generational divide between the previous generation who while loyal to the Reich, would pale in comparison to the utter strength of the newer generations nationalism. This new culture brewing in Germany would assure
Once again the Nazi Party reframed from demonstrating a blatant malice towards Slavic Europe. When it was time for Hitler to make an ally out of a Slavic nation he would justify his alliance insisting the countrymen in question were Slavicized Germans, Turks, Albanians, or Greeks. In some instances Hitler did truly believe that certain Slavs were indeed what he claimed them to be. In one instance he stated “The idea that Bulgarians are Slavs is nonsense, Bulgarians are Turkoman” and also “The Croats are certainly more Germanic than Slav”. His regard to these peoples as racially pure, did not shake him from the position that their cultures had been tainted and they had become barbaric and atavistic hill folk who clutched onto their archaic customs and traditions and refused to modernize. Hitler however remained neutral in his position towards Ukrainians and Belorussians, in fear that Ukrainian and Belorussian insurgencies fighting against the Soviets would become partisans. His true intentions in order to fulfill Lebensraum was to expel all slavs over the Urals and into Western Siberia, an area which many anthropologists of his time considered to be the Proto-Slavic domain. Poles and Russians were in the opinion of Hitler, the largest threat and was blunt in referring to them as subhumans. Hitler wanted unapproved Slavic peoples such as Poles, Serbs, Russians, …show more content…
Hitler would speak of the entire post-war continent as if it was a personal vacation resort, in one instance he stated “The beauties of the Crimea, which we shall make accessible by means of an autobahn—for us Germans, that will be our Riviera. Crete is scorching and dry. Cyprus would be lovely, but we can reach the Crimea by road. Along that road lies Kiev! And Croatia, too, a tourists ' paradise for us. I expect that after the war there will be a great upsurge of rejoicing.” German allies would more than likely adopt a hostile foreign policy towards The Reich, even during the war “allies” of The Reich only took up an alliance to evade an invasion and vassalization. For example, King Boris III of Bulgaria, found Hitler to be a “buffoon” which was more than common amongst other allies of Hitler who simply found Nazi diplomacy to be far too demanding and assertive. In post war America a rebellious movement swept the country in the 50s and 60s that incorporated counterculture of arts and morals that conflicted with the previously set bedrock of American culture. In a victorious Germany, a cultural revolution would also occur, but in a much more reversed direction. In this Germany their would be a generational divide between the previous generation who while loyal to the Reich, would pale in comparison to the utter strength of the newer generations nationalism. This new culture brewing in Germany would assure