The Characterization Of Meltus In The Apology Of Socrates

Good Essays
Humans have a tendency to let certain strong emotions or feeling take control of them and affect them in many ways. These emotions can act as a type of barrier to understanding and comprehending reality. In the book The Apology of Socrates, Meletus of the prosecution is blinded and sees reality in a distorted sense due to his large pride and hatred against Socrates. Meletus is the “representative”, in a sense, for the poets who Socrates insulted by insinuating that the poets were not wise. Meletus is rather indignant with Socrates and also is puffed up in his own self-importance. Socrates questions Meletus with very intensive questions and Meletus doesn’t realize his short, arrogant answers lead him further into a logical grave. Socrates asks questions that deal in absolutes, such as asking Meletus if …show more content…
Meletus harbors a nasty hatred against Socrates. He harbors one because of what Socrates has done, namely go “to the poets…in order that [he] might at the same time learn something from them” (Apology. 22. 22. A7-B5). What Socrates learned was that the poets were not wise but perceived to be wise and that their wise words were actually inspired and no true knowledge rested in the heads of the poets. Meletus takes this very personally and is at the forefront of accusing Socrates. This anger towards Socrates blinds Meletus as did the pride. The perceived reality of Meletus, twisted by his hatred and pride, make him vulnerable to the verbal attacks of Socrates. His anger blinds him to pitfalls and makes him reckless in an attempt to hurt and convict Socrates. Just as pride made Meletus perceive the atmosphere of the argument differently, his anger made Meletus a poor debater against Socrates and Socrates takes full advantage of this and launches into a long discourse about his reasoning. Meletus is rather powerless against him because he had been beaten by Socrates and has no rebuttal against his

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Socrates’ view of wisdom causes him to die. The oracle claims Socrates to be the wisest man and Socrates tries to find a man wiser than him. The men that Socrates has questioned are offended and angered because he accuses them to be ignorant. Others are curious with Socrates and copy his actions, but they get angered because the ignorant men are “pretending to know when they actually know nothing” (Apology 23e). People hate Socrates because he claims that having wisdom is knowing that everyone does not know everything.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    After my reading of the Apology by Plato and studying Socrates’ trial I have come to understand the complexity of Plato’s apology and Socrates’ defence as presented to us. Socrates’ was seen as an unpopular individual who did no right or just in the eyes of his accusers. The account of Socrates’ defence was a long and detailed account which at times was hard to comprehend but it is evident that his approach towards his trial and his accusers was factual. There are many allegation’s put forward on Socrates. He in turn provides a detailed defence against the allegations of corruption and against the different thoughts of his accusers.…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People suffer because they could not accept the truth and were unwilling to change for the greater good. There was a great fear of looking stupid. Examples of this were Euthyphro hastily changing definitions (Plato, Euthyphro, 5e-9e) or the accusation that Socrates was “corrupting” the young even though he was not (Plato, Apology, 24 b4-c4). It was all because of their arrogance that they suffered individually and as a…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He also said, during his investigative philosophical debates, youthful Greek aristocrats witnessed the perceived wise man being examined and imitated Socrates. This in part and the fact that Socrates challenged the wisdom of poets, craftsmen and politicians resulted to rancorous alliance to halt his progress. Was Socrates a victim of political in-fighting then? The ideas, proceedings and ultimate judgement had a political hand all stemming from Socrates criticism to the political class, poets, and craftsmen through his philosophical engagements. Socrates was found guilty with a narrow margin, but his proposal for penalty added insult to injury.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The satirical play, The Clouds, by Aristophanes had been popular at the time of the trial and may have been an effect on the perception of Socrates’ practices and character. He mentions the play during his defense speech, saying it paints him with a bad image; that his sole efforts are to corrupt the minds of the youth, and to speak nonsense. This depiction of him made him unfavourable during the time of the trial, and heightened the publics view of him as a burden on society as well as a nuisance to be rid…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is where people may have been confused with Socrates which lead to his indictment. Indeed, Socrates claim is true and with the right intentions, it has the potential for an individual to gain wisdom and knowledge. Socrates has gained many slanders and criticisms from the Athenians because he questions authorities and respected business men of Athen to reveal them as ignorant in their expertise. His interrogations destroy the beliefs of those who are being questioned, leaving them frustrated and lost without offering an alternative explanation. Not only does he cause them to question their beliefs, he embarasses them by publicly challenging what the wisdom they think they obtain.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates continues to push and push these people to think about their definition and defend it. They get flustered and upset and give up eventually. The thoughts of profound scholars, writers, and rulers were engrained into the minds of these people so deeply that they could not even defend their arguments because they were not their own thoughts. Thrasymachos gets angry and presses Socrates to try to persuade him to attack instead of defend because that is the only way that Thrasymachos will win. This right here proves that Socrates has actually made a man think, for once in his life, but it isn’t enough.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Cave Vs Plato

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato felt his teacher (Socrates) thought that Man should not trust his senses because they could be easily deceived (the prisoners believing only the shadows were real). Leading Man to make false assumptions about reality. Socrates prompts the reader to question their own beliefs regarding reality in collusion with his firm belief in introspection. Which he believed to be the only way of attaining true knowledge and not placing trust in our senses. I felt Socrates is very dominant in his assertions, smug even.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates believes that having knowledge on the world is a very important thing in life. In Plato’s Apology, Socrates wanted to show the people of Athens that not having the proper knowledge on life would lead to an unexamined life and that is what he tried teaching the children of Athens. People like Meletus and Cillias did not see it that way. That’s when Meletus put Socrates on trial for “corrupting the youth of Athens” (Plato’s Apology, 2016). The prosecutors believe he is corrupting the youth because he is an evil-doer, a curious person, and makes the bad things appear better than they are.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 399 B.C.E. Socrates, accused of corrupting the youth and “making the weaker argument defeat the stronger” (Plato), faced the furious Athenian jury. During his trial/apology Socrates explained his perspective, stating that he was no fool because he was aware that he knew nothing “I am wiser than this man; neither of us probably knows anything…, but he thinks he has knowledge, when he has not, while I, having no knowledge, do not think I have” (Plato). As written by Plato, Socrates’ “apology” is no real apology, as Socrates simply brings attention to his argument, while at the same time exposing the weaknesses of the accusations brought up against him. Submerged in his disgust of greed and corruption Socrates sets out to find the “wise ones” but in the process ends up exposing the highly respected yet selfish members of the society.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays