Mass Slaughter: The Cruelty In The Food Industry

Superior Essays
Any kind and decent person would take a stand against the cruelty inflicted on animals by the food industry. Those that chose an alternative diet enjoy the rewards that come with supporting defenseless animals as opposed to the rapacious and malicious food industry. Hopefully bacon and baby back ribs smothered in barbeque sauce will lose their appeal once the veil of anonymity that shrouds the food industry is drawn back.
Why is it that it is acceptable to eat a pig or a cow, but repulsive and almost insane to eat a dog? One of the only defining differences is that to a majority of the American public it is acceptable to mass slaughter one and then cuddle up to the other. The process of this mass slaughter varies depending on the animal, but the brutality remains the same. As decreed by law, when a mammal is slaughtered it must be stunned with an electric current that induces a heart
…show more content…
This eventually created a work environment where employees were constantly under pressure to be as efficient as possible without questioning the cruel methods practiced (Philpott). The food industry also has a tremendously negative impact on the environment; a local example is the Chesapeake Bay, which was “brought to near-ruin by runoff from a stunning concentration of chicken farms” (Philpott).
There is absolutely no valid reason to justify putting money in the already huge pockets of these monstrous corporations. This is why choosing a vegetarian or vegan lifestyle is becoming increasingly popular, besides the fact that it is a much healthier way to live. Leaving animals such as pigs, fish, and chickens off one’s plate results in several health benefits according to the American Dietetic Association. They state that vegetarians tend to, “have lower body weights, cholesterol levels, and blood pressure, as well as lower rates of type two diabetes and heart disease”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. The film presents Temple’s theory of abstractification by exposing the slaughter houses as she is studying at these facilities. She initially thinks of ways to improve things for the cattle because the way they are being treated when she arrives is inhumane. She creates plans and ideas to make the cattle more comfortable and presents the ideas to upper management and owners.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the post-American Civil War era, Reconstruction in the southern United States became an enormous priority. The key protocols of the Reconstruction process involved a focus on improving civil rights. The addition of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution on July 9, 1968, gave all citizens born on American soil equal protection of their unalienable rights without any regards to their race. Before the fighting had split the country into two, “southerners and their allies had dominated the federal government.”…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    " This shows how the industrial meat system hurts animals and consumers. The animals are much more likely to get diseases like E. Coli or salmonella, and consumers become much more prone to these diseases by eating their meat.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans are unaware of the suffering of the animals we consume meat from. For example, majority of the chickens in factory farms have their beaks cut by clipping or burning them off. The factory farms perform this to chickens to avoid chickens pecking each other to death. When we purchase factory farmed pork, beef, or chicken, we are contributing to a factory farming system that harms pigs, cows, or chickens for our gustatory pleasure which is also…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Michael Pollan’s “Farmer in Chief” and Jim Hightower’s “Wal-Mart vs. Hightower” reveal how the health of the American people suffers because of the systematic way food is produced in todays modern society and how the corrupt maneuvering of America’s largest retailers deceive the consumer. The way in which cattle are raised with unnatural foods, such as corn, and the way that the animals are injected with harmful chemical substances are both factors that keep driving the price of food lower and lower. These low prices make it possible for large corporations (such as Wal-Mart) to close small businesses and offer low-wage jobs to people that cannot support the average American family. These practices have had a detrimental effect on the American…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another upstart for this clean food movement was the book The Jungle by Upton Sinclair who was a Progressive/Muckraker and his exact words about the popularity of the book and the social uproar it caused was “I aimed for the Publics heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach”. Upton Sinclair’s book is a deeply graphic depiction into the Chicago meat packing industry and how meat was cut from diseased cattle and for ground meat that there were no safety protocols in place to protect employees. Upton Sinclair even went as far to tell the people how one of the employees fell into a grinder and they did not stop production at all and clean the machine and on top of it all continued to sell this contaminated meat that had human flesh in it. Another reason for the regulation for this industry is health protection/benefits because if the employee happens to hurt themselves with the machine or equipment supplied the employee was fired given no pay or health care for such accident or if something happened to where an employee dies on the job they would not inform their family they just fell off the face of the earth and they wouldn’t know what…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Payton White Professor Hunsaker 3 September 2016 Articles 26 & 27 After analyzing article 26, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” by Alastair Norcross, a couple things become apparent. Such as (only use “such as” if you are continuing the sentence, but not to start a new sentence.) our author opening up his piece with a fictional scenario that seems a tad bit crazy, but serves as a very serious philosophical point. According to our ( it would be best to just say, “the” author instead of “our” author.) author, Norcross sees meat-eaters-at least those who know of the treatment of factory-farmed animals-are completely at fault for the consumption of meat.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They may not provide the same amount of nutrients that animal food does, but are sufficient enough to not lead to any major health issues like those reported in the article. The article claims “vegetarians are two to three times more likely than meat eaters to suffer from depression, anxiety, eating disorders, and somatoform disorders and syndromes” (Araki), and cites this information from research done by Austrian researchers at the Medical University of Graz. Further analysis of the study shows that the researchers mentioned another cause for the increased number of health issues in vegetarians. To quote, “Our results have shown that vegetarians report chronic conditions and poorer subjective health more frequently. This might indicate that the vegetarians in our study consume this form of diet as a consequence of their disorders, since a vegetarian diet is often recommended as a method to manage weight and health”…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eating animals has been a regular meal for humans for many centuries, but it has also been opposed by veganists for many years. Although consuming animals has been opposed by vegan aficionados, it has also been a source of controversy because of how factory farming produces the meat we eat in our daily meals. In the book “Eating Animals” we get the sense that the author will be arguing and encouraging veganism, but instead he argues about how the meat we consume is produced. The author Jonathan Safran Foer’s main claim in the book is about boycotting animal factory farming and encouraging traditional husbandry because factory farm animals are stuffed with antibiotics, mutilated, tightly confined, and deprived of stimulation. While traditional…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Naturally or not, some one has to meet the demand for food. And these food industries are meeting the need. Despite countless shots taken for animal abuse, these companies continue to keep pumping out food from these factories at an immensely fast…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Pollan’s Omnivore’s Dilemma, he explains the journey of how corn developed to what it is today. In 1866, “corn syrup . . . became the first cheap domestic substitute for cane sugar” (Pollan 88).…

    • 2977 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    That is far from the truth. Being a vegetarian can contribute to a healthier life. When a person refrains from eating meat they are more likely to live longer, less likely to develop chronic diseases, be malnourished and less likely to develop diet-related diseases. These are proven statements that resulted from people who have switched from a meat-based diet to a clean vegetarian diet. Top nutrition schools in America such as Ohio State, NYU etc.…

    • 2483 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some choose this way of life for health, animals rights, or just wanting to do something different in their life. Whatever the reason may be, being a vegetarian has it perks when it comes to one’s health. The reductions of obesity, cancers, diseases, and the longevity of life are some astounding benefits to being a vegetarian. This isn’t a paper persuading anyone to become a vegetarian to live longer and have better health. It to inform you of the benefits that just so happen to be an effect of being one.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Animals are not ours to eat. Animals are not ours to wear. Animals are not ours to experiment on. Animals are not ours to use for entertainment. Animals are not ours to abuse in any way.”…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is only wrong if the hunter is killing the animal as a “just because” reason. It should only be morally acceptable if the hunter is killing the animal for food for survival. Another debatable topic is over whether killing animals should be against the law.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays