The Criminologist's Theory Of Deterrence

Improved Essays
Since crime has been on the rise, criminologists try to give an explanation of how crime can possibly be deterred through certain tactics. Criminologists developed the theory of deterrence in order to provide an explanation on how an individual can be steered away from crime. Deterrence can be explained as a form of prevention and a precautionary measure seeking to discourage individuals from crime through igniting fear and/or danger in an individual through incarceration or punishment (Reid, p. 605). The underlying assumption behind deterrence is that punishment will serve as a way of preventing offenders from committing further criminal acts. What matters then is if these theories serve to curtail and reduce crime. This paper explores assumptions

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Over the years, criminologists have endeavoured to explain the causes and suggest solutions for youth criminal behaviour, through the use of criminological models. Pre-modern explanations were rejected by new theories because these theories fundamentally believed in rationality and humanitarianism. The purpose of pre-modern explanations was to identify, a connection between the individual and society; the reasons for disorder and an implementation of sanctions of those individuals who breached the existing norms of behaviour. Most pre-modern explanations relied upon spiritualism and naturalism. The modern models were criminological theories which were developed during the period of industrial modernity to explain offending behaviour.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the course of five years, the Jodi Arias capital murder case and trial captivated a country. The salacious nature of the case, the relationship between the victim and the perpetrator, simultaneously mesmerized and repulsed the public, and attracted intense media coverage. The details of the actual crime are grisly; the physical evidence and crime scene photos make several facts perfectly clear; this murder was intense, brutal, and vicious. The level of violence in the commission of the crime was mercilessly cruel and excessive.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “I see no alternative but to conclude that capital punishment cannot be justified on the basis of its deterrent effect” (Marshall,1972). Proving that is really is not a deterrence. Although one example of where capital punishment could be seen as an effective possible deterrent would be in The District of Columbia which has no death penalty has a very high rate of homicides. There are other deterrents to crime other than Capital Punishment, there is incarceration, fines, moral prohibitions and many others. One study, found that the elevated levels of assurance of arrest on crime lowered the burglary rate in Canada (Zedlewski, 1983).…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Realism In Crime

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Matthews (1987) finds that, "Since the search for causes is often dismissed, the 'solution ' to the problem of crime is to be found, it is argued, in the adoption of more repressive and intensive forms of punishment.” (377). The reasoning behind this theory is by enforcing harsher punishments; it will deter people from committing the crimes. Public fear of crime…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One fundamental policy of rational choice theory is, stricter punishments will keep others from committing crimes. When rational choice is used to help crime control policies, there is a problem knowing if it is effective. Criminologists have not been for the rational choice movement in criminal justice since the late 1960s. Research has shown that some of the rational choice policies have basically no impact on crime rates. Policy makers do not recognize the research, and they have even caused influential criminologists to leave policy debates completely, because they are afraid of their proposal derided and dismissed.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the semester, we have repeatedly discussed statistics regarding current crime and incarceration rates. In comparison to previous rates, from earlier decades, it is clear that society’s viewpoint on crime has changed significantly. Beginning in the early 1970s, the United States initiated a more punitive criminal justice system (1). In The Punishment Imperative, authors Todd R. Clear and Natasha A. Frost created a concept for the reasoning behind this mass incarceration. Referred to as the “Punishment Imperative,” its basis for reasoning focused on the symbolic image that crime held in society; meaning, as crime rates grew, the societal fear for basic safety began to emerge.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I strongly disagree with your philosophy of deterrence as a method of curtailing crime and especially when you use the example of “in some counties you could lose a hand if caught stealing. I am here to tell you that such a punishment would not take place in America. We no longer live in a barbaric lawless society but in a modern society. We live in a society whereby we are guided by morals and values. It’s a delicate balance that we must follow.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another factor taking control over the effect of deterrence is the lack of knowledge. Individuals are not aware of the exact punishment when committing a crime. Finally, prison has becoming less stigmatizing leading to less of a deterrent effect. Individuals are failing to see prison as a harsh place to be (O’Brien Lecture). Closely relating to deterrence, incapacitation is also an ineffective way to handle the growing crime…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With labeling theory it is shown that placing a label such as a criminal on an individual, it will not deter an individual from crime, but make it more likely that the individual will continue or start this behavior and more toward crime. It is discussed that applying a label of a deviant on another makes them more likely to gravitate toward this label and exhibit behavior that goes along with the label. This is a contrast to how the deterrence theory would view criminal punishment. Deterrence theory would see this as a possibility to deter crime as it could use an individual for general deterrence. By labeling the individual as an offender (possible even labeling them as a specific type of offender), the deterrence theory can make an example out of the individual with the type of sanction that is given.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the years, a theory of deterrence has been acquainted with the criminal equity framework. Keeping in mind the end goal to forestall crime society regularly depends on the utilization of prevention. Deterrence is the utilization of discipline as a danger to keep individuals from culpable. The deterrence theory of crime is additionally a technique in which discipline is utilized to prevent individuals from perpetrating violations. There are two sorts of deterrence: general prevention and particular deterrence.…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    B. (2004). Contrasting Schools of Thought in Criminology. Retrieved from http://www.sheldensays.com/new_page_5.htm McKean, L., & Ransford, C. (2004). CURRENT STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING RECIDIVISM. Retrieved from http://www.impactresearch.org/documents/recidivismexecutivesummary.pdf Siegel, L. J. (2011).…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Correctional Ideology

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The previously discussed ideologies had several problems with the effects that they caused. The current correctional practices have problems that have caused the desire for crime prevention to become prevalent. “Almost all offenders are eventually released, however, and the problem returns unless it has been effectively treated while the offender was in prison” (Allen 57). The logic behind crime prevention is clear. Preventing crime is to prevent everything that follows the crime as well.…

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ARTIFACT 1 Ineffective Punishment Crime prevention is equally, if not more important the punishing those who commit the crimes. In a world where our constant need for growth is met with smarter and more dangerous criminals, we need to take more drastic steps to protect the innocent citizens of this country. Even if the means to do so, may seem extreme. Going to prison is thought to deter criminals from committing any crimes.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay I will reflect on the few assumptions and understandings I had about crime and see how they have changed. Upon arriving at De Montfort University to study Criminology and Criminal Justice, I had average knowledge about crime and punishment i.e. insight into biological and psychological perspectives of crime having studied A-level Law and Psychology beforehand. However I did expect to delve so deep into the history and other aspects of Criminology during this first semester. During A-level Law I have read many case studies of murder, manslaughter, GBH, rape etc. I found the main reasons behind committing these crimes were usually motives for revenge, loss of control, hate, rage, and biological inheritance of 'criminal genes ' such as Monoamine oxidase A which makes individuals more prone to exert violence.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Summary Criminology studies the reasoning and factors as to why individuals engage in criminal activities. In classical criminology, social philosophers Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham developed a theory of crime that criminologist and theorist still use today (Akers 2017). In classical criminology, an individual commits a crime by making a rational decision. That decision is based off of whether the benefits that one might receive by offending outweighs the consequences such as being caught and cited or sentenced. Individuals base their decision to offend or not offend on what they have seen others suffer, their knowledge of what consequences they may endure and their own personal experiences.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays