Compare And Contrast The Crime Control And The Due Process Model

Great Essays
In the United States, the criminal justice system follows two unique diverse models that protect the people. One of these models is the Due Process Model and in this model, the rights of the defendant are equally and fairly treated. Which this process being the main objective of this clause. The second model is the Crime Control Model and in this model strict punishments to the defendant committing the crime be forced but also protecting the individual 's rights as well. Both these models have a different method in which they protect the individuals but have a similar focus. Going further, these two models and their methods to safeguard the citizens will be discussed. The due process model is described in both the 5th and 14th Amendment …show more content…
Although these two models fall under different Amendments, both the Crime Control and Due Process model assure protection to individuals upon different approaches. In the criminal justice system, these two model differ. The Due Process Model, the defendant accused of a crime is not guilty. The defendant is innocent until proven guilty (Packer, 1964, p. 41). The Crime Control Model, the defendant arrested and charged with a crime is no doubt guilty (Packer, 1964, p. 39). The main focus in which is anticipated to protect the perpetrator’s due process rights is the right to a counsel. This is established under the Due Process Model (Keith p. 13). “Ineffective assistance of counsel is a recurring theme in wrongful convictions. Under the Crime Control Model, as Packer described it, defense counsel was considered a luxury, or worse, an impediment to efficient processing of the guilty. By contrast, under the Due Process Model, as we have seen, defense counsel was the key to asserting and protecting the defendant‘s rights” (Keith p.43). The techniques of extending

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the judgement of Mason CJ and McHugh J, it was said that a “ trial judge who is faced with an application for an adjournment or a stay by an indigent accused charged with a serious offence [...] the trial in such a case should be adjourned, postponed or stayed until legal representation is available. The judgement also stated that “an accused has the right to a fair trial and that, depending on all the circumstances of the particular case, lack of representation may mean that an accused is unable to receive, or did not receive, a fair trial. “ Moreover, the judgement of Deane and Gaudron suggested that the right to receive counsel was found in the Constitution, specifically Chapter Three which requires that ‘judicial process and fairness be observed.’ However, both Justice Brennan and Justice Dawson dissented, stating that it would unjust for judges to adjourn or stay trial due to the pressures it would place on legal aid agencies. For Dietrich, the outcome of the High Court case meant that without the legal representation he had required for the trial and due to the trial judge’s failure to grant an adjournment, a miscarriage of justice had occurred.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The courts biggest issues were trying to decide whether a trial court’s erroneous deprivation of a criminal defendant’s choice of counsel entitles him to a reversal of his conviction and should proving the sixth Amendment right to proceed with the counsel of choice depend on whether the deprivation of that right also resulted in compromising a defendants’ right to a fair trial. The majority opinion did not apply the Strickland test because they felt that the defendant could not show or give any reason as to why he felt the counsel was ineffective and that the counsels performance was poorly presented and deficient and the defendant was prejudiced by it. What the Strickland test is actually intended for is that the government must contend that the defendant must at least demonstrate that his counsel of choice would have pursued a different strategy and would have created a :reasonable probability”. In court cases the course can be split into two structures; trial errors and structural errors. Most constitutional errors are trial errors that occur “during the presentation to the jury,” and courts have discretion in deciding whether these trial errors are harmless and warrant a new trial.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Allison D. Kuhn’s article titled “If You Cannot Afford an Attorney, Will One Be Appointed for You? : How (Some) States Force Criminal Defendants To Choose Between Posting Bond and Getting a Court-Appointed Attorney”, published in 2012, provides a critique of the present-day US system of assigning state-provided counsel to indigent defendants. The author focused on the ambiguity of the term ‘indigent’ and criticized the system of indigence determination based on the defendant’s ability to post a bond and get released from prison on bail for the period of legal proceedings. The core idea of Kuhn’s is that such a system poses an unethical choice for individuals – to either remain in prison and have the right for state-provided counsel, or be released…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanford University law professor Herbert Packer’s models analyze two contrasting standpoints of the way the criminal justice system is, or should strive to, be. The two split positions charted by the Crime Control and Due Process models seek to describe perhaps the two most prominent positions in regards to the power and influence of the criminal justice system: that the safety of the community should be valued over all else, or that the rights of the individual are the most important values to uphold. These ideological conflicts remain the forefront of problems within the criminal justice system, and understanding each persuasion is essential to analyzing and overcoming differences in each stage of the criminal justice process. The Crime…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The criminal justice system is founded upon the principal of preventing…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When people are charged with a crime, the due process does require the criminal justice law to protect their rights and treat them as an innocent until proven guilty. The pros of this model are, if people are arrested, a courtroom has to find them guilty. This model helps the prosecutors to completely discover the truth of crime, and to clearly understand the charges, and to know better about the collective evidence. It urges the government not to be unfair to the defendants, abuse them physically, or threaten their rights. It also orders the protection of the society from the lawbreakers, as well as the lawmakers.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States of America justice system operates under the assurance of innocent until proven guilty, granting everyone the right to a fair trial and due process of law. The right to a fair trial is one of the many rights under the power of the constitution that protect and secure justice, freedom, and equality. All American citizens are guaranteed these rights under the constitution, whether they are consciously aware of it or not, as was supported under the supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona, which resulted in the creation of Miranda rights. Miranda rights are imperative in order for due process of law to be upheld, thus ensuring and accentuating liberty. Miranda v. Arizona (1966) was the supreme court case that redefined interactions…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Constitution was enacted to ensure that any citizen, who was accused of a crime, would receive fair and equal due process. More specifically, the U.S. Constitution’s procedural rights are defined by the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. These Amendments only reflect a portion of the Constitution’s Bill of Rights however, they are important to the Criminal Justice System because they outline a standard procedure that the government must follow during the entire course of any criminal case. In doing so, both the innocent and guilty are protected from any indiscriminate or arbitrary misuse of the law from the courts, law enforcement and any other member of the judicial system. To preserve certain rights of the citizens, the Fourth Amendment protects…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I chose to compare and contrast the United States’ criminal justice system with England’s system. One significant aspect of the United States’ criminal justice system is due process. Due process is defined by www.reference.com as “the principle that an individual cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without appropriate legal procedures and safe guards (www.reference.com)”. There are many similarities and differences between these two countries, and this paper is aimed to show how both of their criminal justice systems operate. There are many factors that make the United States one of the best nations in the world.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    [In criminal law the most significant body in history is the Supreme Court. It is known as the “highest court in the land”. The landmark cases heard by the court are carefully chosen by the esteemed justices. The choices are usually based on cases where there are violations to an individuals’ Constitutional rights. In this paper, the fourth, fifth, and sixth amendments will be examined, and the safeguards they provide.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The crime control model tends to focus on the conviction and punishment of criminals; while the due process model takes a more liberal approach and focuses on the protection of the individual and their rights. The criminal justice system currently and should use aspects of each model so that things are kept effective and efficient so that the system treats both the victim and the defendant fairly. If the criminal justice system focused predominantly on the crime control model it may allow for police technologies to be implemented which by themselves might cause less crime but can also create concrete evidence to…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Exclusionary Rule

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The exclusionary rule works with the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to protect the people from law enforcement overstepping their boundaries. Security is crucial to human performance. In order for democracy to function correctly, the people must feel safe. The Fourth Amendment works to build American sense of security by protecting…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The conflict and consensus models are two parallel models that work toward furthering the protection of society. The conflict model focuses on preserving the rights of the people while the consensus model focuses on public safety (Cronkhite, 2013). When considering how these two apply to viewing criminal justice as a system it is quite simple. The conflict model creates an urgency to protect the people from harm yet also to preserve individual rights that are guaranteed by the Constitution. If the conflict model is to be applied to criminal justice, then it is important to recognize that laws and policy can be implemented by the criminal justice system to combat crime, while also ensuring that the people do not lose their rights.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sermonfils E Dor 1.Describe and distinguish among the three approaches to studying criminal justice systems by taking an international perspective. Comparative criminal justice is a subfield of the study of criminal justice that relates different justice system from around the world. There are three different ways of studying criminal justice systems. Each of these approaches encounter various beliefs of different societies. The criminal justice systems have changed and transformed over time.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays