Evidence in the admittance of a crime is frequently referred to as the collection of DNA, flammable liquids, firearms, equipment, and controlled substances. Proper documentation of the incident is crucial to uncovering the truth. “On various educational sites such as the “Biography”, disclosed of genuine history, which has painted a considerably more genocidal and brutal picture of renowned Italian pioneer Christopher Columbus who was previously introduced as a legend who found America (Myint).” While the actions of his crimes were exploited the benefits attained through his actions to ensure his legacy were not. Numerous occasions have occurred where an offender has gained “star status” after committing a crime. Accurate and significant notations disregarded often neglects the timing and motive of an offense. In this case, a concrete alibi, inaccurate evidence, and many times cooperation in an investigation can lead to an offender being overlooked or released. He or she may choose to examine the inaccuracies of another to perfect theirs. Thus, said offender gains further knowledge on executing a crime and getting away with it. Documenting anything insufficiently poses a threat to the victim, if applicable, and the individual searching for the …show more content…
Executing the “perfect crime” must involve studying manipulation or at least, make it appear this is what has been done. Not having enough evidence to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt in a trial can result in the given criminal to get away with it. A perfect crime does not exist. It is one that leaves no evidence at all. The evidence will always tell a narrative, possibly not sufficient to convict someone, but only enough to get accurate suspicions. The three major threats to the solving a crime, accuracy of documentation, exploitation of officials, manipulation of spectators and victims not being sufficiently utilized makes it potential to constantly commit the “perfect crime” with no grounds for a conviction left