Critique Of Science In Frankenstein

Improved Essays
Many people may find horror in the idea of reanimating the dead and creating life from it, possibly because it disrespects the dead or reverses the natural order of the cessation of all living things. In Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein discovers a scientific method to achieve this “unnatural” goal, and creates a monstrous being whose existence evokes a sense of terror and disgust from its creator. This outcome then leads to the supposed destruction of Victor, and the tale may serve as a cautionary warning to those who undergo scientific and technological pursuits that go against nature, like creating life from the dead. However, Mary Shelley’s writing does not seem to indicate a critique of science or the making of the Creature, but rather …show more content…
In his narrative, and even in the following encounters Victor and Walton have with him, he is shown as a complex being with great capacities, such as intellect, eloquence, and sensitivity. He is prone to great love, empathy and compassion (as shown with towards the cottagers), as well as fear, rage and violence towards those who have wronged him (like Victor), displaying a humanity like any other person. Therefore, what drives the Creature towards his malevolent intentions and awful acts he commits is the experience of neglect, the knowledge of Victor’s hatred from the letters and encounters, and society’s dejection of his capabilities and humanity. By failing to care for, empathize with, and regard the Creature as a human being rather than a science experiment gone wrong, Victor generates tragedies for which he blames the existence of the being (because of him), instead of his disregard for its well-being in the very beginning of its life. Psychologically, the neglect of a parent towards their child early on results in problematic behavior later in life. Since Shelley equates the development of the Creature to that of a human infant/child, albeit extremely, and Victor to his originator, the initial disregard Victor has for the Creature just after it has been brought to life results in a lack of understanding

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In a world where everything must be donned “good” or “bad’, one has to ask the obvious question, is the science and experimentation in the novel Frankenstein good or bad? Victor Frankenstein sets a precedent of what not to do when you want to perform a science experiment. For this creature to be constructed out of absolutely nothing, Frankenstein must had to “desire it with an ardor that far exceeded moderation” which is unnecessary (p. 45). When someone wants something that bad, it needs to be planned out and organized, not thrown together with no regard to the safety of others. He wanted it more out of selfishness and didn’t realistically think about it and consider the consequences, thus resulting in a catastrophe.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    FRANKENSTEIN: The True Monster Mary Shelly’s novel titled Frankenstein is the tragic story of Victor Frankenstein and his creation. Victor Frankenstein is a man obsessed with knowledge of the unknown. He played a dangerous game with the laws of nature, and creates his own form of man. Guilty of robbing dead bodies of their parts to build his creation piece by piece he has the nerve to feel disgust at what he created.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the iconic 19th century novel, Frankenstein, Mary Shelley criticizes mankind's imbedded desire for that which is unreachable- supreme and ultimate knowledge- and the corruption that follows through mad scientist Victor Frankenstein's pursuit to create unnatural life to his eventual bastardization of the very root of human righteousness. Throughout the novel, Frankenstein's utter obsession for scientific development evolves into an unquenchable thirst for foremost knowledge. It can later be learned within the narrative that this ravenous hunger became a fountainhead for his ensuing corruption and eventual demise. Through highlighting mankind's desire to find the undiscoverable, Shelley symbolizes the contradiction and inevitable destruction of natural human righteousness. Through his determination to fabricate human life, Frankenstein finds he has morphed into a monster, inevitably bound for a life of exile and torment- the very thing he unknowingly was destined to create.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once Victor created this “monster” it brought its conflicts and horrors. He ends up feeling guilty for bringing a new life into the world with no provisions for taking care of the “monster”, which also ends up with the destruction…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some may consider Mary Shelley’s novel, “Frankenstein”, to be a horror, romance, or even science fiction. Although she has written other novels, “Frankenstein” is the most remembered (Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley Biography). This British science fiction novel has been adapted into several films and TV shows. The novel is told in the form of letters, but the perspectives are from Walton, Victor, and the Creature. The novel is about a skilled scientist, who in his search for greatness creates an abomination to nature and God.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I feel that Victor’s response to his creation that he made is very negative and strong. He does not have a respectable word to say about him, and runs from his responsibilities. This is displayed after the creature is born, Victor can sleep then he goes into the courtyard underneath. This demonstrates that he doesn’t care about the monster and that he can leave it just because of its looks. Victor does not even give the creature a chance, as soon as he sees the ugliness of the creature, he rejects it instantly.…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having created this life, Victor is essentially the parent (or the God, depending how much credit you want to give him) of the Creature, and the first impression of humanity he gives it is hatred. Any reader could feel for the Creature in this moment, but since the narration is from Victor's point of view, with a frame narrator who is even more biased toward him, the lack of compassion by Victor isn't pointed out. The fate of the Creature may have been entirely differently had Victor not acted out of reptilian fear and disgust toward the life he made. By these actions, Victor's nature is revealed: he is selfish and incapable of compassion or empathy toward anyone imperfect, and this creates in the novel the theme of the power of creation, and how science without compassion will always lead to…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By the end of the novel, Victor is perceived as a father who abandons his own child and shares divergent characteristics with those of the creature. The two drastic backgrounds of each allow for clarification to the reader that a person’s past does not define exactly who they are. The horrid appearance of the monster directly compares to that of Victor’s own true personality. As the novel unfolds, the creature’s being allows for comparison to that of Victor’s. Their drastic characteristics assist the reader in fully understanding Victor’s true qualities.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After Victor creates the Creature, he is frightened. “I traversed the streets, without any clear conception of where I was, or what I was doing. My heart palpitated in the sickness of fear, and I hurried on with irregular steps, not daring to look about in me--” (Shelley 45). Victor is not as loving and caring to the Creature as his parents were to him. With Victor acting afraid to even lay eyes on the Creature, he does not feel loved or cared about.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When Victor meets his creature on the mountain, the creature expresses his dire pain and sorrow for his existence, stating that his “soul glow[s] with love and humanity; but [is he] not alone, miserably alone?” (69). He also takes refuge away from man toward “the desert and dreary glaciers” (69). Shelley depicts the creature as correlated to nature, as he struggles with a connection toward man due to his rejection. However, Shelley’s statement that the creature expresses his “humanity” within himself only further supports the belief that the creature is equal to man, so he does not understand why everyone despises him.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Romanticizing his need for knowledge and infamy, the protagonist, Victor Frankenstein, of Mary Shelley 's 1818 novel, Frankenstein, asserts, "No one can conceive the variety of feelings which bore me onwards, like a hurricane... Life and death appeared to me ideal bounds... I should... pour a torrent of light into our dark world" (Shelley 94). In the novel, Victor essentially recreates life, a task normally attributed to God, without fear of the moral consequences. In modern science, many scientists have commenced research that explores the possibility of creating life through the development of embryonic stem cells, but support for this possibly life-changing inquisition is constricted by the unethical qualities of the procedure.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Psychoanalytic Theory is the theory of personality organization and the dynamics of personality development that guides psychoanalysis, which was first laid out by Sigmund Freud in the late 19th century. Applying this theory to literary text often gives one a more detailed examination of the minds of the text’s characters. “Frankenstein” is often read through a psychoanalytic lens, as there have been many articles, books, and dissertations written on the subject. The relationship between Frankenstein and his monster is troubled, and Freud’s theories regarding the Oedipus complex and the components of the human psyche help to understand why the characters are so troubled. Frankenstein created his monster with the Id and Oedipus Complex as his…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the surface, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, is a novel about science going too far. Diving deeper, there were recurring themes about religion and mythology as Frankenstein tried to take on the role of God. Victor wanted to learn the secrets of immortality by creating life but did not think of the consequences, leading to his tragic downfall. He believed that knowledge was the greatest power to obtain, however, his pursuit of it, Victor disrupted the balance between nature and science, making him the author of all or the tragedies in his life. Despite Victor’s other sins, Shelley showed that trying to play God was his greatest crime.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lot people in this book are scientist; Two Professor, M. Waldman, M. Krempe ,and Victor. Mary shelley mention about science because she want us to think that scientists are playing with God. World is the creation of God, and why would you like to change it? In this case, Victor dig up a dead body to recreate a human, even though God already take back the person. And also if the scientist are more responsible of what they are doing, they will not more dead people and no more killing each other.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the professional literary critiques that emerged following the publishing of Frankenstein were less than positive in their evaluations of its quality and value. Some of these critics devalued it based on its failure to present a positive message to readers while others criticized inconsistencies within the story. One article that criticized both aspects of this novel was The Literary Panorama and National Register’s “Review of Frankenstein; or the Modern Prometheus.” This paper was well known in this era and considered a credible source of information regarding literature. Despite offering superficial compliments, the author attempts to prove that this work of fiction is a disappointment considering the school from which it proceeds.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays