The 1850 Compromise Of 1850

Improved Essays
from Mexico which included California, Texas, Nevada, New Mexico, and Arizona. With the discovery of gold, people rushed to California in large numbers. So large, in fact, that the state was eligible to become a state. Because the state was mostly under the 38th Parallel, it was supposed to be admitted as a slave state, but the people voted that California become known as a free state. It eventually led to the creation of the 1850 Compromise. The Compromise of 1850 was suggested by Henry Clay and it was made to help relieve tensions and come to an agreement between the free states and the slave states. The 1850 Compromise allowed California to be admitted into the country as a free state and abolished slavery in Washington D.C. Unfortunately, …show more content…
Douglas suggested the Kansas-Nebraska Act because he wanted to remove any obstacles to the transcontinental railroad. The act allowed both Kansas and Nebraska to be admitted into the union as either a slave or free state depending on what the citizens voted and is also known as popular sovereignty. It also overturned the Missouri Compromise since the citizens could vote. The act contained thirty-seven sections and was approved on May 30, 1854. This led to problems, however, because people from both slave and free states rushed to vote to decide on the fate of the states. It evolved into conflicts with one another because the two do not get along with one another especially in Kansas. As a result, they fought in an event known as Bleeding Kansas, where both sides started to fight the other in a mini Civil War. After the fighting, Kansas was admitted into the union as a free state. Because of the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the fights that erupted because of it, tensions between slavery …show more content…
It started when John Emerson, a Missouri slave owner, brought Dred Scott, his slave, into Fort Snelling in Wisconsin Territory, where slavery is considered illegal. In Minnesota, he married another slave that Emerson owned. After Emerson died, Dred Scott sued Emerson’s widow and won in the lower courts but did not win in the Missouri Court and was assigned to John F. A. Sanford. Scott then sued Sanford because Scott believed that since he lived in free states, he should be freed as a slave. In 1856, the trial carried up to the Supreme Court where a decision was made. The Supreme Court said that Dred Scott could not sue for his freedom because he was a slave under Missouri law and slaves are considered property, thus not being able to sue. The decision was that there was nothing in their power that they could do to make people slaves or free. This angered many Northerners where they believed that slavery should be illegal compared to the Southerners, who were pleased because they believed that slavery should be legal. Tensions got worse until the South could not handle it in the most important election in American history.
A famous abolitionist by the name of John Brown made himself known in John Brown’s Raid. John Brown was one of the people who started Bleeding Kansas when he helped initiate a small civil war by murdering five settlers who were thought to be proslavery. In

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    While in office there was the dred scott decision, The Kansas question,Panic of 1857. Which states were admitted into the Union. Supreme Court rules in Dred Scott case. The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery. In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois,…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri that had travelled with his master to the free state of Illinois. After his master died he believed that he was free because he was now in a free state and petitioned for his freedom. Once this case made its way up to the Supreme Court the ruling was in favor of the South, wherever slave owners move they maintain the rights to their slaves, even if they move to a free state. Again, the North was not happy. This ruling meant that slavery could potentially exist in the North as well; once again slavery was somehow creeping into the North.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dred Scott married his fellow slave, Harriot Robinson. Together they would have two girls and would continue to “work” under Dr. Emerson. In 1840, Dr. Emerson would leave his slaves, and wife in St. Louis to go and serve in the army for two years. When he returned he moved them to Iowa, which was a free territory, but the Scott’s would not claim their freedom. Dr. Emerson gave Dred Scott and his family a lot of freedom, but they were still entitled to him.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott was a former slave whose slave’s owner moved to a free state where slavery is prohibited. When they returned to Missouri Scott sued for his freedom that he had by living in a free territory. The discussion take place during the trial was basically that a Negro slave descendants free or not were not apart of the people. Africans were inferior and had no right of a white man. They also challenged the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution by stating that the situation is not warranted by the constitution.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas attempted to pass both the Kansas-Nebraska Act, as well as the Compromise of 1850. He sought to repeal the ban of slavery north of the 36 degree 30” line previously established in the Missouri Compromise and to admit California as a slave state. In so doing, he sparked political controversy creating a divide between between anti-slavery (typically Northern) and pro-slavery (typically southern) politicians. These pro-slavery laws ignited widespread anger throughout the North, creating fissures within political parties which would eventually lead to divisions within them. Additionally, the numerous Acts passed in an effort to appease each side of the slavery controversy, also undermined the Country’s overall domestic tranquility.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scott then got another suit government court. Scott 's lord kept up that no immaculate blooded Negro of African plunge and the relative of slaves could be a national in the feeling of Article III of the Constitution. At the point when the Army requested his lord to retreat to Missouri, he brought Scott with him back to that slave state, where his lord kicked the bucket. In 1846, Scott was aided by (abolitionist servitude) legal advisors to sue for his opportunity in court, asserting he ought to be free since he had lived on free soil for quite a while. The case went the distance to the United States Supreme Court.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard about the slave sued his owner’s widow for his freedom? Well, the decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford is considered to be one of the most influential in legal history because the Supreme Court decided that the slaves are not defined as citizens of the United States, thus influencing their ability to sue in federal courts and this case eventually raised questions about slavery which led to the civil war. Dred Scott was a man who was once an African-American slave. He was sold in Missouri as a slave to an army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, they later moved and lived in free states; Illinois and Wisconsin. Then, they moved back to Missouri, which is a slave state, but John Emerson passed away in 1846, so it is time he should become free.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the 1850s, slavery, and other political issues between the states, became a sizable issue. Slavery began to dissect people. For example, the Northerners began to begin support free soil and abolition. However, the Southerners disagreed, and tension increased dramatically. Soon, the Southern slaveowners felt that their rights were no longer being illustrated, and felt that they must succeed (secession is the act of withdrawing from an organization, union, military alliance or especially a political entity, to be protected from Northern abuse.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was an African American man in the United States that sued for the freedom of himself, the freedom of his wife, and the freedom of his kids in the Dred Scott vs. Stanford case. Dred Scott believed that he and his wife should have been granted the privilege of becoming United States of America citizens because he and his wife had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory for four years. The U.S. Supreme Court voted against Dred Scott 7-2. With the disagreement of the Supreme Court, the Dred Scott Decision was brought up. The Dred Scott Decision was a decision in which free or slaved African-Americans were not allowed to be American citizens and the federal government had power to regulate slavery.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 brought Missouri into America as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Everything above the Louisiana Purchase Boundary line, with the exception of Missouri, banned slavery. This action resulted in maintaining an equal representation for both the North and the South in the Senate. Following this, the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to be admitted as a free state, however popular sovereignty would be used in the land of the Mexican Cession. This caused controversy within the states.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe the Civil War was fought over the issue of slavery, state’s rights, and also the power to control the West. What ultimately caused the Civil War would be the Compromise of 1850. Other main factors that caused the Civil War would be John Brown’s raid, the Second Great Awakening, and also the involvement of women in the Abolitionist movement. The reason as to why the Compromise of 1850 was the main cause of the Civil War would be due to the fact that it increased sectionalism, did not solve the issue of slavery, and also paved the way for the Fugitive Slave Laws of 1850. The reason why these events are the most significant are that they are the most pivotal events to occur during this time, which ultimately paved the way for the first…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The increase of sectionalism was an important act formed by the events following the Mexican-American War by causing states to secede, transportation developments, and eventually leading to the start of America’s bloodiest battle, the Civil War. These events led to how America is viewed by people today and what our state’s rights are and will be. By the end of the Mexican-American War, America had gained rights over California and many southern states. Prior to the Mexican-American War, slavery between the states was an ongoing complication that began to cause conflicts. The conflicts created led acts established by the people that became an important statement for why the Mexican-American War and the Civil War were started.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was a series of congressional statutes passed in September of 1850, in which the United States Congress sought out to settle conflicts between those who opposed slavery in the North and those in favor of slavery in the South. There is much speculation about what the United States would be like today without this Compromise. Which leads to the question, should the Compromise have ever been approved? Still, regardless if the Compromise was approved or not, the Civil War was an inevitable event in American history. The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt to solve tensions between the North and the South over the expansion of slavery, specifically into Texas, which was a territory obtained by the United States in the Mexican…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Compromise of 1820, also known as the Missouri compromise, was a bill that was formed to create boundaries that split the United States between the Northern free states (non-slavery), and the Southern slave states. The boundary line for slave states and non-slave states was latitude 36°30′(see map below). At the time the northern states economy was industrial, and the southern states economy was more agricultural. For this reason the southern states relied heavily on the use of slaves to farm the land. In 1819 Alabama joined the union as a slave state.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays