Example Of Oligopoly

Great Essays
Oligopoly

What is oligopoly?
Oligopoly refers to a situation with a few firms on the market and the central assumption that differs from the competitive model is that the firms understand that their actions affect the market price. There is an industry of different models, but most of these are in some way or another variations on the two really central models of oligopoly. These are:
1. The Cournot model, where the strategic variable is a quantity choice.
2. The Bertrand model, where the strategic variable is the price charged.

Besides being important in themselves, these models also illustrates well how the tools from game theory is used in economics. We will try to keep things as simple as possible, so we will typically only consider
…show more content…
Pure because the only source of market power is lack of competition.
An example of a pure oligopoly would be the steel industry, which has only a few producers but who produce exactly the same product.

• Impure oligopoly – have a differentiated product. Impure because have both lack of competition and product differentiation as sources of market power.
An example of an impure oligopoly is the automobile industry, which has only a few producers who produce a differentiated product.

Globalization

The revolution in information technology, the liberalization in the movement of factors of production (labor and capital) and globalization (multinational companies) are bringing dramatic changes in the way modern corporations conduct their business. To an extent also these change drivers (globalization and the prevalence of multinationals) are reducing the importance of the above trade barriers. Many of the wellknown multinational companies (Coca Cola, Pepsi, Gillette, Unilever, Proctor & Gable as well as manyncompanies in the services industry) managed to achieve scale economies in production without having a large market share at home by achieving entry in many foreign markets and thus selling
…show more content…
There are two points to be made here:

1. Both parties have a dominant strategy, which is to confess. Thus, the equilibrium is for both to confess. This is also the Nash equilibrium (why?).

2. A cooperative surplus exists. If both confess, they are not cooperating. Thus, the equilibrium is the non-cooperative solution.

If they both refused to confess then they would both get 2 years in prison and not 10 years. Why don’t they cooperate?
The answer is not just because they can’t trust the other party to not confess. It is because it is always better to confess that not to confess regardless of what the other party chooses. This is what a dominant strategy means.
How can you change the results in the prisoner’s dilemma? A crime organization does it by changing the payoff matrix to increase the penalty if one confesses. For example:

Individual A’s choice
Confess Don’t Confess
Death, Death Death, 15
15, Death 2, 2
Individual B’s choice- Confess Don’t Confess

In this case, as long as both parties are sure that to confess is to die then the cooperative solution will also be the Nash equilibrium. This is also a dominant

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lying to some people can be filled with an overwhelming guilt. This is how John Proctor felt when Reverend Hale and the judges wished him to create a false confession to witchcraft. It was important to the judges that Proctor created the false confession. Reverend Hale believes God would be more forgiving to Proctor for lying; however, Goody Proctor believes the Devil may say the same thing. If John agrees to composing the false confession, he subjects his further kin to ridicule and shame, and loses his one and only honest piece of what will be left.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thematic Synthesis Paper The Crucible and the Scarlet Letter Different forms of punishments among Puritans served the dual purpose of inspiring individuals to repent and preserving certain social norm (ehow.com).This is shown in both “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller and “The Scarlet Letter” by Nathaniel Hawthorne the unique ways for the guilty to suffer for example in the scarlet letter Hester Prynne had to wear a letter of her bosom forever and was used as an example of shame publically. And in the Crucible, Salem witch trials were held in which people were hanged if they did not confess for witchcraft, even if they were innocent. Some characters did not expose their guilt like Rev. Dimmesdale – who was an adulterer and John Proctor—who committed…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A monopoly is essentially trust businesses that work together to control an industry. Monopolies by definition control the market by eliminating their competition which in many cases are small businesses. One attempt that the government and individuals made to address this problem was The Sherman Antitrust act of 1890. This antitrust act sought to prevent business take advantage of individuals by raising prices. This act proved to be ineffective because the government had a tendency to allow business to do what they want, a laissez-faire.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “The Crucible” in the year 1692 in Salem, Massachusetts people were accusing others of “witchcraft”. People in this era were very christian. This all got started when they found the girls in the woods dancing naked. These girls then acted up and then were blaming other innocent people of witchcraft in order for them to get out of trouble. This then lead to deaths of the people.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    By giving criminals the notion that they do not have to take responsibility for their crimes, it gives them incentive to commit more violations of the law! This is because, through plea bargaining, serious criminals are often given…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article “Inside Interrogation: The Lie, The Bluff, and False Confessions”, published by Jennifer Perillo, and Saul Kassin, discusses situations and potential contributors that can result in false confessions. Perillo and Kassin focus on what are called situational pressures, the use of false evidence, including the use of a fake witness, or false documented proof of the crime happening-also known as a bluff tactic- as risk factors for why people falsely confess to crimes they did not commit (Perillo & Kassin, 2010). The use of this evidence can result in a false confession through one of two ways: the false evidence could cause a suspect to begin to internally believe that they had committed the crime, or a suspect could believe that if they falsely confess now, they will later be proved to be innocent through the evidence. Perillo and Kassin ran three experiments that dealt with how a…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 10 of Examining Wrongful Convictions: Stepping Back, Moving Forward our authors Take a look into our plea-bargaining systems role into wrongful convictions. According to our authors plea- bargaining dispose of roughly 95 % of adjudicated criminal cases (Maguire, Tbls. 5.24.2008, 5.46.2006). Over my years of taking criminal justice course I have learned to so many innocent people actually plead guilty to crimes they did not commit. DNA evidence which lead to an exoneration is evidence of just that. Wrongful convictions produce out of our Plea Bargaining are much less likely to result in an exoneration due to the defendants own admittance.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keep in mind this is the goal. Therefore if the prisoners are told this they are more than likely to take the role as an “optimizing individual: and rat on the other. So that they can walk away with no jail time at home. However they don’t realize that if they are thinking like this then then the other prisoner is doing the same. Which could mess up their plans and end up getting them both 10 years.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Progressive Monopolies

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Monopolies often engaged in price setting and produced poor quality goods, unfairly…

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evidence Interpretation

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages

    With lacking evidence, detectives and prosecutors choose the most likely suspect, however; this is not always liable as from time to time, the individual in question is not guilty. There have been cases over the years where innocent defendants are coerced into confession during questioning; confession evidence can be quite compelling in front of the judge and jury (Braithwaite, 2012). Furthermore, individuals who are innocent and being prosecuted for a crime can be convinced that there is enough substantial evidence to prove their guilt, even when there is little to no substantial evidence in the case to start with. They are pushed to believe they would not make it through trial and receive an innocent verdict, often times causing blameless persons to accept a plea-bargain (Gilchrist, 2011). Unfortunately, there is substantial evidence proving that more guiltless individuals are imprisoned due to accepting a plea bargain than taking the case to trail and demanding their innocence (Gilchrist,…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reputation is defined as a presumption on any person or thing, usually made by the community or general public. Many of the characters in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible are self-involved and excessively worried about maintain a good reputation within the small community. The Crucible discusses many events and issues within the reader which links to today’s society. While reading this play. Due to the controversy of many detailed within, it is difficult for me not to compare today’s society to the play.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When someone is told, “They will not hang if they confess.” That lingering fear of death will push them to do whatever they can do to avoid that fate. “He wake me every night, his eyes like coal, and his fingers claw my neck, and I sign… I sign…” (Miller, Act 3). It was a hard decision for Mary the whole time in the court.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Supreme Court’s early decisions on plea bargaining approve plea bargains as involving not just a stationhouse confession but as “more than a confession which admits that the accused did various acts” (Garrett 4). To be sure, plea bargains are justified on many other important grounds, particularly because they are efficient, they avoid uncertainties of outcomes at trial, and they permit choice, compromise, and flexibility. The many critics of plea bargaining point out how even the innocent may plead guilty to avoid higher penalties at a trial, with the resulting process empowering the prosecutor and largely eliminating judicial oversight. Plea bargains are not confessions, but part of their power and seeming legitimacy comes from the defendant admitting to guilt—or at least appearing to do so. Practices range widely, with some courts even tolerating plea bargains en masse with nothing particularly individualized about the process.…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After hours of questioning, some people may get tired and just admit to a crime so the interrogation will end (Perina 11). When a person truly believes that they committed a crime, they will almost always confess, even if they are…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Prisoner’s Dilemma certainly gained its reputation for fame in the world of game theory for the paradoxical strategic and moral issues it poses regarding human cooperation. In this game, you and a partner must testify about a crime that you two have committed together, and you each have the option to either cooperate, which would entail staying silent and not giving up your partner, or defecting, which would imply ratting out your partner. There is no way to know what your partner will choose, as you both must testify at the same time, in separate rooms. You face varying amounts of prison time depending on the actions that both you and your partner take: if you defect while your partner cooperates, you receive no time in prison while your…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays