Corduan's Essay: The Infinite Universe

Improved Essays
The Infinite Universe
Winfried Corduan argues that unless there is a God, there could not be any world. He attempts to beat this criticism by clarifying a premise and conclusion to the Cosmological Argument, using metaphysics. In this paper, I will prove this argument fails at explaining the creation of our universe. Reading through Corduan’s essay, has actualized a potential in my brain. I now truly realize that Winfried Corduan is actually an expert on the actualization of potentials. At least I would hope someone who could write eight pages on a subject would have some knowledge of the topic. Although I agree with everything Corduan had to say about potential finite things being actualized by actual finite things, I do not believe he has proven God 's existence. I also agree with what Corduan says about the five
…show more content…
This is another instance where I agree with Corduan, but this situation is not complimentary to the argument that God created the universe. In the situation described, it would be reasonable to assume that someone stabbed the king with the knife. It would not be reasonable to assume that a loyal subject of the king entered his quarters to relay a message. A message that was so heinous the king could no longer live with himself, and instructing the loyal subject to prop a knife with the blade facing up so the king could purposely fall into the knife ending his own life. This follows along the lines of Occam’s razor, which states that the hypotheses with the fewest assumptions should be selected. If we take this razor to the Cosmological Argument, it becomes clear adding God to the equation is just adding an unsupported assumption to the equation. If we are looking for the beginning of the universe, why should we assume some other entity with origins just as unknown as the universe 's was responsible for its

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    God is the best explanation, but not necessarily the only explanation. The second important thing to remember is that yes, these arguments are defeasible, meaning that it is possible they could be wrong. However, atheists and McCloskey have yet to provide a defeater for our arguments. We as Christians could be wrong, but someone has yet to prove us 100 percent wrong. The cumulative case approach is the idea that not one argument is the ultimate argument for proof of God’s existence.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Teleological Argument for the Existence of God, also known as “Arguments from Design”, states that a designer must exist because the universe and living things exhibit marks of design in their order, consistency, unity, and pattern, and that designer is God. One of the analogies used for this argument is William Paley’s Watch Maker Argument. He gives the scenario: if you were to find a watch in an open field you would automatically assume that it was designed and did not just randomly form out of thin air. Based off this argument, if you agree that the universe and its inhabitants are designed in some way for a purpose, then there must be a designer responsible, which would be God. Believers in the Teleological Argument also argue that scientists and evolutionists are unable to explain how complex organisms such as the eye originated.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will analyze the argument of the “Fine-Tuned Universe”, describe what it means, show how an opponent would argue that intelligent design isn’t the best explanation, and also provide my own view on this argument from my theist view. Have you ever wondered how the universe got here? How everything perfectly fell into place, and how you’re here today? The Fine Tuned Universe argument may help you better understand. This argument is a version of the teleological argument, which is an argument for an intelligent creator, that basically suggests there are many very specific things that make life possible, and if any of these very specific things were to be altered, life as we know it would be highly unlikely to exist.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moreover, who made God's maker? The risk of a boundless relapse of makers, each hypothesized with a specific end goal to clarify the presence of that coming to it, looms. By chance that there is a vast relapse of makers, however, at that point there is no first maker, no extreme reason for the universe, no God. Maybe, at that point, the theist ought to keep up that God doesn't have a maker, that he is an uncaused reason. In the event that uncaused presence is conceivable, however, at that point there is no compelling reason to hypothesize a God that made the universe; if uncaused presence is conceivable, at that point the universe could be…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that St. Anselm’s ontological argument is not adequate in proving the existence of God. First I will discuss his ambiguous use of the term “God”. Then, I will move on to analyze the term “greatest” made in his premises. Lastly, I will also criticize Anselm's argument by demonstrating that Anselm’s reply to Gaunilo’s objections are unconvincing. Anselm was the first one who developed the ontological argument, an argument for God’s existence based on reason, not on physical evidence.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Craig that he is “the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheist.” In this debate the same will occur for my opponent and all reading. Argument 1: Kalam Cosmological argument (KCA) (Heavily influenced by Dr. Craig’s presentation on the subject) P1: Whatever begins to exist has a cause “Nihil fit ex nihilo” That is to say that nothing comes from nothing.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “There is sufficient reason to believe that God is the cause of the universe” The cosmological argument is a multitude of arguments that have been developed to modern day ideas. These arguments are based on natural theology; this is when someone has knowledge of God based on experiences. It is a philosophical argument that aims to prove the existence of God. The cosmological argument rejects the idea of infant regress because if that is the cause there is no need for God.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zayd Boucaud Professor Sarah Allen Philosophy December 4, 2017 "Cleanthes' Argument from Design" This essay will divulge into the deeper meaning of Cleanthes’ argument from design, with an explanation of not only his views, but the opposition’s as well (with a further understanding about why his argument may be proven invalid.) Cleanthes’ premises (leading to his valid conclusion) will have further, more simple explanations that will show his own reasoning in favor of God’s existence.) Flaws in his argument will be displayed subsequently, which will lead to the conclusion of his argument overall: ample validity but simply lacking soundness.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an effort to argue for the existence of God, Saint Thomas Aquinas provides five cosmological arguments in his piece “The Existence of God”. The second argument he states examines causes and effects and looks to explain these series in regard to their beginning, or first cause (43:1-2). Aquinas says that the chain of causes and effects cannot go back to “infinity” (43:60) because when the first cause is taken out, so is its effect and every following effect (43:61). I find this claim plausible because this would mean that there would be no “caused” things in existence. Aquinas follows to say that “there obviously are such causes” (43:62) in existence, so the first cause must not have been taken away.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One might argue that the Cosmological Argument doesn’t get us to the Christian God. One might argue if an I-being is even the same as God. Another question is if an Atheist can even accept the existence of an I-being. What Clarke is getting at here though is that he is not trying to prove the I-being is God, just that there is an I-being and there is a cause to beings. This could be a God or even just the universe.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the beginning “In the beginning,” the famous first words of the most sold book in the world. The purpose of this literature review is not to enforce any of the beliefs on how the universe and it 's inhabitants came to be, but merely provide the evidence that both sides have used in order to defend the beliefs of each side. Creation Creationism, the perspective that the universe and all it 's inhabitants were created out of nothing by God (Triune God), or at least by an intelligent designer (ID). There are three approaches to creation, biblical creationism, scientific creationism, and scientific biblical creationism. In biblical creationism approach, the word of Bible is the sole source used to defend creation.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is prime reality – the really real? I was thinking ‘What is reality’? I decided to look up the definition. “Reality is the conjectured state of things as they actually exist, rather than as they may appear or might be imagined. In a wider definition, reality includes everything that is and has been, whether or not it is observable or comprehensible.…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Existence of God This argument about the existence of God, better known as the cosmological argument, begins with the late philosopher Aristotle. Similar to a modern day natural scientist, he believed that we could ascertain more about the world and the very fundamental nature of things within our world just by observing and recording. In many ways Aristotle resemble a modern day artist, a person who goes through life experiencing and watching all different types of energy that’s around, visually records this information and help others by spreading this knowledge to the mass. Aristotle too, would look and study the world and its patterns that were around him in order to gain insight into his world.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Parfit introduces his understanding of non-causal answers by first distinguishing between two questions. He asks readers to first contend why any sort of universe would come into existence and then to ponder why the created universe operates as it does. With respect to the creation of the universe, Parfit explains that reasons for the existence of any sort of universe are usually directed towards the existence of an omnipotent deity or the eternal existence of the universe.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays