• Home Page
  • The Cosmological Argument Of Contingent Existence

The Cosmological Argument Of Contingent Existence

Improved Essays
Show More
Today I will try to explain the Cosmological Argument . The Cosmological Argument are two major arguments that explain or existence from a philosophical stand point. At the heart of these arguments lie the questions are “why does anything exist”, and “why something rather than nothing”? It also makes the point that unless God exists all other questions are unanswerable. The cosmological argument is divided into two sides as I state earlier, The Kalama Argument and, “The Argument of Contingent Existence.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Ontological Argument Analysis

    The two arguments that I think are the most compelling from this unit are the Ontological Argument, which is a priori argument, meaning before the experience. The other argument that is compelling is the Cosmological argument which is a posterior argument, or after the experience. The Ontological argument cam from Anselm and it states that “it is greater to exist in the mind and reality that just the mind, therefore God must exist” (McGowan). The Ontological argument isn’t about facts about the cosmos, but rather the concept of God. The Cosmological Argument states that “everything that is in motion is moved by something else, and infinite regress is impossible; there must have been a first mover; that first mover being God” (McGowan).…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of The Kalam Cosmological Argument
    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of The Kalam Cosmological Argument

    Nathan Cha Professor Song Philosophical Perspectives 17 December 2015 The cosmological Argument In William Lane Craig’s, “The Kalam Cosmological Argument,” he argues that whatever begins to exists had a cause of its existence, and since the universe began to exist Craig claims that the universe had a cause for existing. Craig furthers his claim by stating that God is the cause for the universe existing. To object to this argument J.L. Mackie brings some questions to the table to unpack Craig’s claims.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis
    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

    “Contingent beings require a necessary being as their ultimate cause.” (3) There are several objections to this theory. The first argument is the atheistic claim that the universe has always existed. This objection can only go against the temporal forms of the argument though. The non-temporal form of the cosmological argument does not deal with the concept of time, and is able to stand up to this objection.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing The Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing The Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God

    When it comes to the position of the existence of God, several arguments are debated. The cosmological argument, according to the text, holds the position that the universe exists and that something outside of the universe is required to explain its existence; that something being God (Pojman, 57). William Paley presented an inductive, teleological argument in which he believes that we complex beings didn’t occur naturally, thus, the universe must have an intelligent designer (class notes). An opposing position, argued by Hume (Cleanthes), presented several arguments to discredit Paley’s position on the existence of God. Though both men held unique points of views from their arguments, I believe that Hume did a better job at discrediting Paley’s teleological argument and showing exactly where it failed.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis
    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis

    Therefore, something distinct from the universe, some unconditional agent would be necessary to have created the universe. McCloskey also claims that the cosmological argument “does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-respect, uncaused cause.” In light of Evans and Manis, we might response that the argument from design only seems to show the existence of a necessary being that is the cause of the universe. (Evans & Manis, 2009).…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Osmological Argument Analysis
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Osmological Argument Analysis

    Craig that he is “the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheist.” In this debate the same will occur for my opponent and all reading. Argument 1: Kalam Cosmological argument (KCA) (Heavily influenced by Dr. Craig’s presentation on the subject) P1: Whatever begins to exist has a cause “Nihil fit ex nihilo” That is to say that nothing comes from nothing.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God
    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God

    Cosmological argument The cosmological argument is a well known argument that attempts to prove the existence of God. The most common leader of the argument is Thomas Aquinas who devised Five Ways to prove the existence of God, which he referred to as “demonstration.” It comes to the conclusion that God exists from posteriori because it focuses on cause and effect to come to an assumption that God exists, which contrasts with the priori approach to the ontological argument. Linear religions generally accept that God made the universe ex nihilo because in Genesis God existed at the beginning of time; therefore, He must be the cause of the universe because you can’t have an effect without a cause.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Assess The Cosmological Argument
    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Assess The Cosmological Argument

    “There is sufficient reason to believe that God is the cause of the universe” The cosmological argument is a multitude of arguments that have been developed to modern day ideas. These arguments are based on natural theology; this is when someone has knowledge of God based on experiences. It is a philosophical argument that aims to prove the existence of God. The cosmological argument rejects the idea of infant regress because if that is the cause there is no need for God.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On The Teleological Argument
    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Essay On The Teleological Argument

    The teleological argument is an argument attempting to prove God’s existence based on the evidence of design and order in the universe. It works based on the belief that there must have been an intelligent designer, and the only being powerful enough to have created the universe is God. The argument is a posteriori and inductive; it looks at our experience of the universe and draws inferences from it. As they are based on inferences, these conclusions are statements of probability rather than perfect proofs. Many philosophers have worked on the teleological argument – for example, Thomas Aquinas and William Paley.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument Of Existence
    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument Of Existence

    The first argument McCloskey objects is the Cosmological Argument. The Cosmological Argument is considered the argument of existence. McCloskey argues that the existence of the entire world does not make it a legit reason to believe in a higher being. He suggests the only reason people take this stance behind the Cosmological Argument is because they are reliant organisms within the world.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Aquinas The Existence Of God Analysis
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thomas Aquinas The Existence Of God Analysis

    In an effort to argue for the existence of God, Saint Thomas Aquinas provides five cosmological arguments in his piece “The Existence of God”. The second argument he states examines causes and effects and looks to explain these series in regard to their beginning, or first cause (43:1-2). Aquinas says that the chain of causes and effects cannot go back to “infinity” (43:60) because when the first cause is taken out, so is its effect and every following effect (43:61). I find this claim plausible because this would mean that there would be no “caused” things in existence. Aquinas follows to say that “there obviously are such causes” (43:62) in existence, so the first cause must not have been taken away.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Samuel Clarke's Cosmological Argument Evaluation
    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Samuel Clarke's Cosmological Argument Evaluation

    Sense brute being do not have a cause, they can’t exist through the principle of sufficient reason. The cosmological argument is defended through this…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Why God Allows Evil By Ernest Nagel And Does God Exist?
    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why God Allows Evil By Ernest Nagel And Does God Exist?

    Many believe that the universe started with the big bang. Others believe that the universe is endless and the existence of the universe has always just been there. With no time and no space, the universe started without nothing prior to the big bang. The problem with the cosmological argument is that it does not explain the existence of the universe. A theologist would state God had to start the universe and Nagel questions, what caused God?…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Purpose And Existence
    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Purpose And Existence

    The first of three major arguments For God are the Cosmological Arguments. These ideas pertain to how the universe and things in the universe function. The first is that everything in the universe is put into motion by something else. Nothing just randomly gets up and moves, something…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of Derek Parfit Why This? Why Anything?
    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis Of Derek Parfit Why This? Why Anything?

    Parfit introduces his understanding of non-causal answers by first distinguishing between two questions. He asks readers to first contend why any sort of universe would come into existence and then to ponder why the created universe operates as it does. With respect to the creation of the universe, Parfit explains that reasons for the existence of any sort of universe are usually directed towards the existence of an omnipotent deity or the eternal existence of the universe.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings