Essay On Cosmological Argument

I believe that “The Cosmological Argument” for God is still quite valid, my reasons for defending this argument have been produced after a great deal of reflection on the matter, I have concluded that the argument is still quite useful. To best describe the argument, it is the conclusion that “nothing comes from nothing” as was stated by St. Aquinas, in other words God must exist because if there was nothing then we needed something to “call it into existence” so to speak. This coincides perfectly with the Law of Causality, which is widely believed by both scientists and philosophers alike and is the belief that every event must have a cause, treating every event like a domino effect. I have to defend this argument because I have made my own …show more content…
The way that I see it “The Cosmological Argument” is a very good argument for the time it was conceived as, given the level of human understanding, it was a good point, no one had any clue exactly how the world was made. Today however, we have plenty of theories on how the universe was created, of course one would not be considered wrong in believing such things would debunk this argument. Perhaps on the surface the argument seems quite thin when looking at it, I mean now we have a way that the universe was created in “The Big Bang” we have disproven the existence of God, right? Well, perhaps if you are trying to find something other than a God to believe in “the big bang” is enough, the theory begins to fall apart when …show more content…
With everything taken into consideration, the reason for the existence of a God is because in the context of mathematical probability the universe could not have created itself, and even if it had the second near impossible feat of a planet such as the earth coming into existence makes the entire concept very