When, for instance, astronomers are making claims on what they are observing, they are subject to logical critique as well as one’s concerning the observations themselves. Any presupposition, unforeseen consequence, or logical failure is equally a barrier to truth as failures or limitations of observation. (Markus, 809) Biasing any understanding on a bundle of ideas, which correspond to “what is” would lack nuance in use. To say -- If A then (A or B) is not the same as If (A and B) then A – would be difficult to come by with correspondence theory of truth. In order to justify a proposition within a correspondence theory of truth, there is a simple relationship between a proposition and what it is to correspond with to make it true. Correspondence theories restricted their practitioners to a very limited scope that they must work under. Truth cannot often be found in a universe that only contains a proposition and its corresponding truth marker. (Markus
When, for instance, astronomers are making claims on what they are observing, they are subject to logical critique as well as one’s concerning the observations themselves. Any presupposition, unforeseen consequence, or logical failure is equally a barrier to truth as failures or limitations of observation. (Markus, 809) Biasing any understanding on a bundle of ideas, which correspond to “what is” would lack nuance in use. To say -- If A then (A or B) is not the same as If (A and B) then A – would be difficult to come by with correspondence theory of truth. In order to justify a proposition within a correspondence theory of truth, there is a simple relationship between a proposition and what it is to correspond with to make it true. Correspondence theories restricted their practitioners to a very limited scope that they must work under. Truth cannot often be found in a universe that only contains a proposition and its corresponding truth marker. (Markus