• Home Page
  • The Correspondence Theory Of Truth: The Pragmatist Theory Of Truth

The Correspondence Theory Of Truth: The Pragmatist Theory Of Truth

Improved Essays
Show More
The Correspondence Theory Over the last century, the world has become a place of everlasting technological advancement. The yearn for knowledge and advancements in academics has brought about an magnificent change in the world. Societies across the globe are rapidly changing and evolving due to new discoveries in the fields of knowledge, but many may ask the question: How can this knowledge be trusted? How is knowledge justified? Such questions bothered the intellectual minds of philosophers centuries ago. Philosophers look at truth in three different ways: The pragmatic theory of truth, The coherence theory of truth, and The correspondence theory of truth. Amongst all the theories of truth, The correspondence theory of truth seems to be …show more content…
The theory has had a long history with philosophers of the past such as Plato, Aristotle, and Thomas Aquinas, but in modern philosophy the view of Bertrand Russell, who is a modern philosopher, is upheld. “Undoubtedly the most popular theory of truth is the correspondence theory , which says that truth is an agreement or correspondence between a proposition and some fact in the real world”(Velasquez 403). As a student of philosophy, I would like to analyze The correspondence theory of truth by comparing it The pragmatists theory of truth and The coherence theory of truth, I would like to analyze the facts and the real world, which are part of the theory, and provide some objections to the theory.
In the search for truth, philosophers have come up with many theories regarding truth and justification. The most famous is correspondence theory of truth than the pragmatists and coherence theory of truth are quite popular which are drastically different from the correspondence theory of truth. “According to the coherence theory of truth, a belief is true if it “coheres” with other beliefs that we regard as true”( Velasquez 409). This theory says that statements can only be true if they cohere to other

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Naturalized Epistemology
    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Naturalized Epistemology

    Justifying belief and what is knowledge’s nature and scope is well defined by the philosophical stance of “naturalized epistemology” in that knowledge comes from the empirical sciences though it’s application of theory, methods and results. Knowledge comes from proving things. This is different from the classical foundationalism which asserts the need to basic belief from which other beliefs can be built on. This essay will discuss the distinctiveness of naturalized epistemology, then how it differs from classical foundationalism and conclude with why it is referable. It should be noted that both systems of knowledge have many variations and so this short essay is more a general discussion.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Crucible Truth Analysis
    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Crucible Truth Analysis

    The willingness to die for the principle of truth and justice is an action of true heroism. As the town of Salem is quickly sliding into chaos in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, John Proctor speaks out against injustice and shadowed lies of afflicted girls. John is forced into a position where the sins of his past come to threaten his name and life in the village. A true definition of John’s character depends entirely on his actions to oppose the deception that may kill all innocents in Salem. John turns from an unwilling voice to a fully-involved participant in the dealings of accused and afflicted; he will fight to bring truth to the eyes of the villagers and make a choice between living a life of lies or having a death filled with truth.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Analysis Of Truth Decay: Defending Christianity Against The Challenges Of Post Modernism
    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of Truth Decay: Defending Christianity Against The Challenges Of Post Modernism

    Originating from the Enlightenment, “the modernist vision presupposed the power of rationality to discover objective truth”(Groothuis, para. 7). Deconstructing such a definition, modernism believes that faith and reason cannot be adequately juxtaposed. Thus, modernism asserts that science and reason discover truth. Often purported as an extension of modernism, post-modernism flatly denies modernism's quest for truth. Groothuis, in his book, Truth Decay: Defending Christianity Against the Challenges of Post-Modernism comments that “’Truth’ [in the Post-Modern mindset] is considered to be an empty construct…rationality is dismissed as mere logocentrism…science is deemed domineering and oppressive and unable to discern objective truth” (para. 17).…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Ayer's Argument Analysis
    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ayer's Argument Analysis

    Moreover, truth goes beyond grammatical convenience. For instance, I'm drawn to believe that the statement "it is true that the apple is blue" is false, regardless of its claim. This is because that statement does not possess the property of truth. So where does this property of truth come from? My reason and intuition lead me to adopt the correspondence theory of truth as a more suitable alternative.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And Rationalism
    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Realism And Rationalism

    Isabella Stengers is deeply critical of scientific notions of Realism and Rationalism, which states that the real world is described by science alone and deductive reasoning is the chief source of knowledge respectively. Along with this criticism, she is advocating the idea that science should be integrated with other modes of knowledge to form an ecosystem of practices. The modern practice of science is brimful of varying conceptual loopholes. Firstly, the so-called scientific method does not provide its validity: there does not exists an experiment which proves the correctness and universality of the method of experimentation.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Coherentism
    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Essay On Coherentism

    Is coherentism about justification plausible? When it comes to the acquisition of a true belief leading to knowledge, it is thought that these beliefs should be justified. Coherentism is a form of internal, non-linear justification which holds the idea that for a belief to be justified in any way it must cohere with a current system of beliefs. BonJour wrote that 'what justifies beliefs is the way they fit together' , in essence, for beliefs to be justified they must metaphorically form a lattice like structure, where they each support each other, creating a non-linear structure of justification. Coherentism is mostly considered as an internal form of justification as this process of reflection on our current beliefs to accommodate new ones is an internal, mental process, as opposed to those external theories of justification such as foundationalism which rely on empirical and perceptual data forming core beliefs together being the source of justification.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Stuart Mill
    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill

    Throughout their history, arithmetic and mathematics in general have largely been held as peculiarly separate from the physical and social sciences. This is based on the seeming certainty of arithmetic, opposed to the verifiability of the empirical sciences. This uniqueness has generated significant discussion on the exact nature of mathematical truth. The inductivists held that mathematical truths were simply an extension of empirical science; mathematical truths are simply highly probable rather than certain. Hempel defends a view known as logicism: mathematical truths are analytic truths of logic.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Propositional Epistemology
    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Essay On Propositional Epistemology

    Propositional epistemology is field of study in philosophy that deals with theories of knowledge. Traditionally, epistemology consisted of the idea that if one was to have knowledge, one must have a justified true belief. This was held to be the case until Edmund Gettier wrote a paper titled “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” challenging the traditional account of knowledge. This was one of the first times that epistemic norms had been challenged.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    What Contradiction Means
    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages

    What Contradiction Means

    In everyday language we often claim that certain statements oppose or disagree with one another. We claim some sentences mean the same thing, or are equivalent to one another, but the manner in which we do this is imprecise. We make statements such as “All people love Elvis” and, when someone else claims that “No people love Elvis” we assume that the statements are contradictory, but we do not really have a clear definition of what “contradiction” means. From a logical perspective, statements about the same subject matter can either oppose one another or be equivalent to one another. We will begin by examining opposition.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Deontological Theory Of Epistemology
    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Deontological Theory Of Epistemology

    Margarita Rodriguez Philosophy of Nursing Millers College of Nursing October 9, 2015 Discussion Question 2 The word epistemology itself comes from two Greek words ? Episteme? meaning knowledge or understanding and ? Logia?…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against The Coherence Theory
    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against The Coherence Theory

    My objective in this paper is to discuss the credibility of the pragmatic theory of truth in contest to the coherence theory. Although some scholars support different components of the coherence theory, I will discuss the issues that delegitimizes the entire premise of this theory. This paper will provide an outline of the coherence and the pragmatic theory of truth through a condensed analysis of works/research conducted from different philosophers. Subsequently, I plan to argue against the coherence theory by providing examples and reasons that invalidates this ideology as an acceptable form of evaluating “truth”. The premise of this paper is to highlight indisputable evidence that supports the pragmatic theory of truth, meanwhile providing…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Theme Of Truth In Richard Dewitt's World Views
    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Theme Of Truth In Richard Dewitt's World Views

    The correspondence theory of truth states that something is made true if it corresponds with reality. In order for something to be made true in terms of…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Four Theories Of Epistemology
    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Four Theories Of Epistemology

    Epistemology can be simply defined as the study of knowledge and justified truth. Throughout this semester I was introduced to each of the different theories of epistemology and how they apply to different people’s lives. Epistemology involves a numerous amount of theories, but four of the theories in particular caught my attention. The four theories that I was able to directly and indirectly analyze were: the correspondence theory, nihilism, empiricism, and relativism. Each of these theories differ in many ways but, all have a solid explanation as to why they view truth and knowledge in life the way that they do.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Comparison Of Rene Descartes And David Hume And Epistemology
    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparison Of Rene Descartes And David Hume And Epistemology

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Pragmatism
    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Pragmatism

    Through looking at our beliefs we can determine if they true ideas or not. If they provide us with valuable and positive consequences. While also fitting in with our worldview. In this way it 's superior to the other philosophical epistemologies because it can give us truth and knowledge, without it having to fit within a rigid structure, but also allowing for objective truths as well. There are still problems with the theory.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings