Tsar Nicholas II Coronation

Improved Essays
In May 1896, the coronation of Tsar Nicholas II only succeeded in highlighting the conceited opulence, indulgence of the Romanov dynasty, and the complete lack of caution regarding the ever-increasing discontent among the Russian peasantry of the late 19th century. The actions or lack thereof of the Tsar and his dignitaries to the tragedy that plagued the coronation itself emphasised the lack of compassion toward their citizens. While it is obvious to see from the collection of diary entries from the day of the coronation, not everyone in the Romanov dynasty was as Cold-blooded as the Tsar exhibited. Such as grand duchesses Xenia and Olga, who showed great concern over how Tsar Nicholas II conducted himself on the day, which in fact was just …show more content…
This essay will attempt to compare, contrast and analyse just how significant a part the coronation played in the downfall of the last Tsar of Russia, all the while discussing and debating the different personalities, reactions, and/or lack thereof displayed through the lens of various sources, authors, and critics.

The coronation itself was an event of immense luxury, as grand duke Konstantin mentions in his personal diary entries, Nicholas’s cousin glorifies the arrivals of the court musicians, golden coaches, the horses draped with golden cloths, and the embroidered uniforms of the Tsar, his wife, and his
…show more content…
The Tsar claiming it left an “ugly expression”, possibly emphasising how the Tsar was more concerned with the image of his regime rather than the actual citizens that perished. “Nicholas II himself didn’t visit Khodynka field after the tragedy and didn’t hold a memorial service, which was expected of him. He did not even express his words of sympathy. He did not stop the celebrations in honour of the coronation. And soon he simply left Moscow. No mourning, no visits to monasteries. People never forgave Nicholas II for that.” It also well documented that Nicholas was obliged to attend a ball at the French embassy that night, but Nicholas believed it to be distasteful to attend after the prior events, however, Nicholas was informed that his absence would not go over well with the French, Nicholas attended to appease the French, this supposed side of the Tsar wasn’t obvious to the public who were becoming increasingly irritated by his supposed lack of compassion. This callousness displayed by the Tsar wasn’t a solitary expression in the inner court, grand duke Konstantin was exceptionally loyal to the Tsar, “his face had an expression of piety and supplication,” and “the young Tsarina is the embodiment of kindness and goodness,” this seemed to contradict what some thought of the Tsarina, “What a woman she was, an empress to her fingernails. She had the whip hand all right. Nicholas couldn’t even blow

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II was the last tsar of Russia before the Russian Revolution. “Nicholas II, who assumed the throne with trepidation upon his father Alexander III’s death, was a clumsy and ineffective leader” (SparkNotes Editors, 2009). This was evident when Nicholas II did not respond to the events of ‘Bloody Sunday’, a catastrophe that caused two-hundred thousand protesters led by Father Gapon peacefully up to the Winter Palace and were met by armed soldiers and mounted Cossacks on the 22th of January, 1905. Nicholas II was present in the Winter Palace at the time so other ministers decided to ‘deal’ with the situation, when Nicholas had returned to the Winter Palace he did not respond to the event and lost respect from the lower classes in Russia, such as workers, and peasants. For ten months it seemed that Nicholas II was going to lose control of Russia until he made his October Manifesto which addressed some of the objectives in the petition that Father Gapon presented, such as free speech and the establishment of the…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Tsar was not at the Palace at the time and the army opened fire on the peaceful protesters killing 1,000 people according to modern estimates. This only increased the tension between the Tsar and his people as ‘a notable feature of the 1905 revolution was how minor a part was played by the revolutionaries’ 9 this means that there should have been no reason for the peaceful protesters to even…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Cossacks rode right into the crowd and slashed with their sabres like madmen. A terrible confusion rose. ”(Source E). The awful events of this day marked a change in Russian attitudes, previously the Russian people had view their Tsar as the ‘little father’ a protector of Russia however now he was seen as ‘Bloody Nicholas’ the man who’s institutionalised brutality and incompetency be it directly or indirectly to the deaths of thousands of innocents, it was this shift in attitudes that gave way to anti-tsarist propaganda from the Bolsheviks and a revitalised interest by the Russian people in changing the way Russia was…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicholas was charming and intelligent a man who had the welfare of russia at heart. But Nicholas lacked the necessary characteristics for autocratic rule. He was anxious, distrustful of ministers such as Witte and stolypin, who urged reform. his abilities were undermines by his diffidence and irresolution.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He told Nicholas that the country was on the verge of revolution so potentially devastating. Nicholas had two choices, crush the rebellion or give the people civil rights, freedom of speech, and press, Nicholas recoiled at the idea of these democratic reforms. "The heart of the tsar is in the hand of God" Nicholas told his ministers any change would weaken the sacred, mortal power bestowed upon him by the Almighty. "I act in this spirit only because I am certain that it is necessary for Russia". Due to this Nicholas he thought it wasn't wretched that living conditions that had lead to the country's problems, it was the people that had turned against the autocracy and their holy tsar.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The line “…by authorities whom We shall appoint” clearly shows how the Tsar is reluctant to give his people their rights as he wanted to keep his power and the system of Autocracy in Russia. This can be amplified in a letter to his ‘dearest mama’ on the 2nd of November, 1905, “…this terrible decision, which I nevertheless took quite consciously” further reinforcing the fact that Nicholas II was not sincere in improving his own nation from the release of the October Manifesto . The contradicting statements in the October Manifesto further stimulated the growing discontent of the people as the rights that they are given are still limited by Tsar Nicholas. As Trotsky states in 1905, “Everything is given and nothing is given”. Therefore, the release of the October Manifesto was a key event…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The snow falls heavily on January 30, 1905 and the light powder begins to cover the thousands of bodies that lay strewn, lifeless in the streets. Among the figures of men and women you can see, "children's corpses lay in the snow" (The Last Tsar of Russia). Tsar Nicholas II was the last tsar of Russia. He was a family man with no desire to rule and did so poorly. He would have driven Russia into the ground had not been forced to advocate.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Internal turmoil of fighting countries boiled to their peaks by the end of World War I. The end of the war left countries left in ruins financially, geographically, and even governmentally. Influential countries, such as Russia, Germany, and Austria-Hungary, experienced change on a much more dramatic level. Revolutions were sparked by ordinary citizens and fueled by the desire to fix what had been done in the government both during and before the war.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Peter I (the Great) is a Russian Tsar and first Russian Emperor, who reigned from 1682 to 1725. At this time, the country was in decline pretty much in all social, political, economic and cultural spheres, and Russians themselves were regarded by Europeans as illiterate barbarians (Hughes 12). There also was a troublous time for the throne, causing vulnerability among the masses (Hughes 3). Coming to power, Peter brought the development and social stability, which people longed for a couple of decades. However, his methods sometimes were radical, which in combination with the fast pace of the changes that he was implementing caused massive discontent among the country’s elite as well as rigorous patriots, arguing that he wanted to make Russians…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nicholas Romanov Failure

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nicholas inherited the role as supreme autocrat of Russia, which contained one sixth of the world’s land mass and over a hundred and thirty million people (Nilsen). When Nicholas II’s reign started, millions of his subjects were living in poverty and foreign relations were precarious. Regardless of his own abilities, the task of being tsar was a daunting one and there were many issues facing Nicholas. Unfortunately, Nicholas II only added to the problems…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then the heir was still." ("The Execution of Tsar Nicholas II, 1918 - EyeWitness to History." ) The effect of Nicholas the second of being in power was that Russia was in a big hole. A Lot of people died and all they could do was protest but all that did was kill more of the people.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which did not help him with the people. After the big horrible Russo-Japanese war there was an even bigger Revolution, and this was the Russian Revolution of 1905. The Russian Revolution was a changing point for all history. It is a story of changing powers in the modern days. This revolution end after Nicholas approved a representative assembly the Duma and promised constitution forms.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fall of the Romanov Dynasty was, in large part, due to the inadequacy and ineptitude of Tsar Nicholas II, who triggered; social, political and economic discontent, and hence, brought about his own downfall. He played a key role in the declination of his empire and thereby induced his own deposition through; his inability to lead effectively as a sovereign, as he didn’t possess the necessary character traits to rule and was determined to maintain his autocracy. Another contribution to this (his downfall), was his involvement in WWI, due to its disastrous effects on his government. These factors were instrumental in the ruination of Nicholas II and are part of the role he played in his own downfall.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dramatic downfall of Tsar Nicholas was the ended the Romanov dynasty in Russia. It ended autocracy as a political system in Russia and lead to the creation of the Soviet Union which went on to spark major tensions with the world in the Cold War. This historical turning point shaped much of 20th century history and the lives of over 293 million people. In between this huge political drama and cataclysmic revolution appears a most mysterious and dark individual who has become a legend in Russian history.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Source A shows a painting based on a terrible day in St. Petersburg January 9th, 1905. Analysing this painting, we can see the lined-up palace guards, many firing at the protestors while they collapse, and scramble for safety. Bloody Sunday started an attempted revolution for great change. This protest ended in a catastrophe and gained Nicholas II the name; ‘Bloody Nicholas’ due to his palace guards opening fire on the protestors upon confusion and chain reaction further impacting the lives of Russians. Such an event where Nicholas wasn’t around would give a terrible nickname.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays