Conversation Appraisal Analysis

Improved Essays
The conversation transcription used in this appraisal analysis is based on a phone conversation between a civilian named Mark Sanders (a 33 year-old white male in Connecticut) and the secretary of the Connecticut police department (a middle-aged white female). The conversation topic between these two participants regards the new gun-confiscation regulation on those who possess firearms and Mark’s argument on the new law which violates the Constitution. The man initiated the call to the Connecticut police department. The conversation took place sometime after the Sandy Hook Elementary shootings, on Dec 14, 2012, in Newtown, Connecticut. This analysis focuses on the speeches of the male speaker.

1. Attitude

1-1. Affect

Throughout the conversation,
…show more content…
He assumes that there will be some changes to take place regarding the new gun laws against those who own firearms, which he thinks will violate the constitution of the United States. His assumption of the topics not only leads him to rationalize his argument that the new laws will violate the Constitution of the United States, but also makes him justify himself that he is doing a right thing to protect his rights on the current gun laws. Therefore, his assumption on the topic of the conversation greatly affects him to use more proclaiming and declaring forms of language which demonstrate his willingness to present his power and will to protect his rights on the current gun laws.

3. Graduation
Graduation in this discourse is identified through Mark’s use of Extent and Quality forces. The force of Extent is designated when Mark initially asks the question on the topic to the police as the conversation starts as the transcription below.

Mark: Alright. This is Mark. I’m just calling a:bout the, uh, what’s goin with, uh, the gun laws right now in Connecticut. They say, uh, they all have to be registered. Is that still goin on at
…show more content…
The effect of using the Graduation force of time and space in the initial stage of the conversation is to confine the time and space more specific, providing more confined and narrowing-down information on the topic to the audience.
Moreover, he uses force of Quality such “really” and “even” as he declares his willingness to find out the truth on the issue by calling the police back as he winds up his utterances. Through the use the word “really”, he puts emphasis on displaying his willingness to gain the information he wants, while the use of “even” has an effect of highlighting the unfairness of the current situation as the transcriptions below indicates.

Mark: I’ll just give ya a call back () Cause I really’d like to find out the uh (1)h truth on information a:bout the uh(1) gun confiscation and wa(i) they even wouldn’t be talkin about goin against constitution by takin Americans’ faia arms away frm.

4.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    takes an analytical approach to both sides of the debate. The skyrocketing rise in interest groups advocating on enforcing tougher firearm policies can be attributed to the incremented insecurities within public places, such as the ones mentioned in the documentary. There are no precise demands proclaimed by these advocates for the exception of “tougher firearm policies.” The theory behind their reasoning is that the implementation of tougher firearm policies would subsequently reduce the number of firearms in the streets and thus lower the probability of disasters like the Columbine and Sandy Hook school tragedies. However in similar fashion, the rise in awareness for the interest group advocating the passionate defense of the American’s right to bear arms, known as the N.R.A. (National Rifle Association), has captivated the American political scene and continues to heavily derail this theory by proclaiming their own.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    JOINING THE FRAY: GARRET KEIZER’S LOADED LIBERAL WAKE UP CALL Published in Harper’s Magazine, Garret Keizer’s “Loaded” uses race as a way of demanding that, as citizens of the United States, we wake up from our progressive indifference. The brilliant author flips his intended audience’s liberal beliefs and uses it against them to successfully prove his point. The majority of Keizer’s essay is seemingly about the gun debate. The lefty audience is likely to have strong anti-gun opinion, whereas Keizer subtly shares that he is pro-gun and owns a shotgun.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In his article, he provides the reader with arguments that are usually made by either politicians or gun-owners that support the Second Amendment. However, he makes it clear that these are not his personal opinions by responding with a rebuttal against these common arguments. Using his reaction to the most immediate shooting in a church in Texas, Gopnik hopes to persuade readers who are wary of gun control that it is a necessary measure in American society. Gopnik uses analogies and sarcasm to make the need for gun control in America more apparent to the reader in an understandable…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout American history, the topic of gun control has been an argument filled with controversy. There have been a number of traumatic events in the country that involved the use of guns; Because of this, many Americans have become weary to the thought of anyone being able to carry a gun. Over the years, there have been many different stances developed pertaining to this topic. Some believe the Second Amendment should be completely abolished, others believe there should be no restrictions on guns, whatsoever. There is also an opinion in the middle of these two stances; some think by combining the two opposite beliefs and collaborating their ideas, a fair resolution could be made.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My rhetorical ecology’s primary goal is to articulate the many levels of statistical data surrounding gun control in the US. I start off the presentation with the Bill of Rights and immediately provide commentary from individuals who played a fundamental role in the foundation of the United States. Then, I state current gun control laws currently in place. From here on out, I expand on specific analytics: mass shootings, other deadlier killers, and total firearm violence. The audience this argument appeals to is people who react to gun control regulations after mass shootings occur.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He claims that hardly anyone even supporters of the view that it is the individual’s right to own and bear arms is opposed to the necessity of regulating firearms in some effective way. Accordingly, the author makes it clear that the issue is not reasonable regulation, and claims that the government, in his opinion, be capable of and should decide what weapons are okay for certain individuals to have possession of. He also states that it is generally agreed on, at least in his opinion, that nowhere in the Second Amendment does anything prohibit the government’s right to some restriction. He also states that it is also typically granted that individuals should not be in possession of largely destructive weapons like a grenade launcher. The author writes, “Everyone agrees that within some reasonable bounds, the government can and should regulate who owns which types of weapons.”…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Interpreting the Second Amendment In the Bill of Rights, the citizens are given the privilege to own firearms for their personal protection. However, the Second Amendment seemed to take away this right by adding the concept of “organized militia.” In Columbia v. Heller, the court held that individuals could possess firearms without having to be the members of a militia. However, judge Stevens gave a dissent stating that all judgments should be made with the direction of past cases and court decisions. His main argument came from the fact that gun control laws had not been made unconstitutional.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Detrimental Truth: Trevor Noah Examines the Good and Bad Following Congress’ Gun Control Filibuster by Jason Nawara In following Congress Gun Control Filibuster, Nawara states "the first two bills that set to be voted on are as follows: people on terrorist watch lists are now stopped from buying a gun. Republicans want these people to have 72 hours so the FBI can find probable cause to deny their weapon purchase. The second bill closes a loophole in which gun purchases online or at gun shows circumvent background checks. The background check bill, in a similar but different from failed to pass after the Sandy Hook massacre.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Phone Call Narrative

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first abstract of this narrative is when the speaker initially mentions the reason why he makes the phone call to the police department as he says “This is Mark. I’m just calling a:bout the, uh, what’s goin with, uh, the gun laws right now in Connecticut.” The sentences established to commence the aim of the conversation as he explicitly explains the purpose of why he made the phone call to the police department. Following his comment on the purpose of the phone call, the orientation of this narrative is identified in the clause “what’s goin with, uh, the gun laws right now in Connecticut. They say, uh, they all have to be registered”.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many prominent leaders, including Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, and Robert Kennedy, were assassinated by deadly weapons-- firearms. Guns’ very existence can either harm or use to defend. The issue lies on who exactly gets hold of these weapons. Who should we trust? How should such laws be justified?…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns Laws Must Be Changed The debate on new gun legislation at the federal and national levels is roaring topic in today’s American society. On one side of the argument, “gun lovers” constantly make mention of the second amendment and how the law protects the rights of Americans. On the other side of the argument, Americans expecting gun reforms argue new and clearer laws will be preferable for the future of America. Nevertheless, on both sides the truth of the matter is in the statistical evidence of gun violence and gun accessibility.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism and Gun Control Gun control in the United States has been a controversial topic for a number of years. The different ways in which one can interpret the constitution plays a big role in the controversy between whether certain gun control laws violate your civil liberties as citizens of the United States. There have been numerous court cases dealing with gun control, with some of the major including: District of Columbia Vs. Heller, McDonald Vs. Chicago, and Peruta Vs.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will be analyzing and criticizing the argument given by Jeff McMahan in his paper “Why Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough”. This essay goes against my personal bias and strives to support an argument in favor of private gun ownership to a certain extent. McMahan is hasty in deciding that a complete ban is necessary to restore order and peace; I refute his conclusion by showing that a gun ban would not be able to stop the ongoing need for safety and because of this an increase in gun control policy would be the best solution to the gun problem in the United States. One portion of the paper provides a summary of the argument given by McMahan in his paper in depth, evaluating his premises and conclusion to establish the position the…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Realizing that his audience includes liberals who know this, Cronin does not try to find any rare statistics that are in favor of firearms. Although he could have just avoided numbers altogether, he concedes that, “statistically speaking, a gun in the home represents a far greater danger to the inhabitants than to the intruder” (Cronin 20*). Although he is giving up some ground on his case, this confession shows readers that Cronin is not trying to fool anyone. He argues that the dilemma of gun ownership is not as much about what the stats says, but instead a decision that “comes from the gut” (Cronin 20*). By admitting that guns could potentially bring danger to his family, it makes the reader even more eager to hear his pro-gun…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay, “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson a Management and Policy professor at UCLA, argues that legally owned guns are not the problem, in fact the real problem lies with society ignoring the usage of illegal guns. The purpose of this essay is to convey to society that gun crimes can be stopped before a shot is fired, that it does not entitle a huge stack of forms at the local gun store. Wilson effectively argues that legally owned guns are necessary for citizens to protect themselves, reasonable police frisks should be in place to stop illegal gun use before the crime is committed and ultimately guns agitate the situation making crimes worse. The authors credibility and logical appeal are overall effective, in spite of the lack of emotional appeal or connection to the audience. Despite the absence of Pathos, the author conveys an adequate amount of logic, which carries the paper to an effective and persuasive conclusion.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics