The cartoon is claiming the quota from 1620 is full. This cartoon is trying to promote the idea that original Americas from Europe are Americans not new immigrants. All Americans besides Native Americans are immigrants so in theory America should try to allow in as many immigrants as possible, that seems logical. America is a country that needs to protect its citizens and if immigration needs to be limited for a certain logical reason then it should be done. Not allowing certain immigrants in is a problem; it should be all or none. The cartoon seems to make fun of the idea of how America is limiting immigrants. In the next document the Houston Chronicle calls for an end to the KKK. The article claimed that while they think they are fixing America
…show more content…
The article seems to try to expose the KKK to its members, telling them to abandon it. The KKK is a terrorist group and the article is trying to expose that idea to the members who are decent people. The next document Bob Shuler tries to defend the KKK by saying they are defending America. He claims that other organizations like the Knights of Columbus are just like the KKK. The Knight of Columbus has an oath just like the KKK, which binds them to the organization. Then he claims that the KKK’s oath is more American. How is it possible to compare these two organizations based on how American their oaths are? Shuler claims that the KKK is trying to defend America by foreign influences. How can you define who an American is, the KKK can. Why should the KKK become America’s vigilantes? Do they really need to defend America from foreigners or even people whose families have lived in America for many generations. The KKK cannot try to shape American culture. The article defends the KKK by saying the organization causes people not directly related to the KKK are doing horrible things it’s not the KKK. Should the KKK have been allowed to exist even if they were theoretically committing no crimes, it was just rogue members committing …show more content…
Sanger claims that it is a women’s choice to follow the path of motherhood or not and birth control can help make that decision and help women live normal lives. Why should others make the choice for women, for whether birth control is legal? This idea of controlling others’ lives ties into the previous articles, why should one group of people decide what is best for everyone in general. Why does the KKK think they should harass immigrants and black people, or why should law makers decide what is best for every women. Birth control was a critical movement that would show how people in general do not like change and how the progressive movement was critical for women and children in the world. It brought new ideas that everyone was equal and had equal rights. Everyone is different but why are some differences discriminated. The fight against birth control was illogical. Birth control was a great advancement in the human race, but some saw it as different and they did not like it. If one person does not like one thing they should not limit others to that
The article seems to try to expose the KKK to its members, telling them to abandon it. The KKK is a terrorist group and the article is trying to expose that idea to the members who are decent people. The next document Bob Shuler tries to defend the KKK by saying they are defending America. He claims that other organizations like the Knights of Columbus are just like the KKK. The Knight of Columbus has an oath just like the KKK, which binds them to the organization. Then he claims that the KKK’s oath is more American. How is it possible to compare these two organizations based on how American their oaths are? Shuler claims that the KKK is trying to defend America by foreign influences. How can you define who an American is, the KKK can. Why should the KKK become America’s vigilantes? Do they really need to defend America from foreigners or even people whose families have lived in America for many generations. The KKK cannot try to shape American culture. The article defends the KKK by saying the organization causes people not directly related to the KKK are doing horrible things it’s not the KKK. Should the KKK have been allowed to exist even if they were theoretically committing no crimes, it was just rogue members committing …show more content…
Sanger claims that it is a women’s choice to follow the path of motherhood or not and birth control can help make that decision and help women live normal lives. Why should others make the choice for women, for whether birth control is legal? This idea of controlling others’ lives ties into the previous articles, why should one group of people decide what is best for everyone in general. Why does the KKK think they should harass immigrants and black people, or why should law makers decide what is best for every women. Birth control was a critical movement that would show how people in general do not like change and how the progressive movement was critical for women and children in the world. It brought new ideas that everyone was equal and had equal rights. Everyone is different but why are some differences discriminated. The fight against birth control was illogical. Birth control was a great advancement in the human race, but some saw it as different and they did not like it. If one person does not like one thing they should not limit others to that