The Controversial Topic Of Euthanasia By Dr. Peter Saunders

Decent Essays
Euthanasia is a controversial topic that has been very impactful on the people who have been thinking about following through with euthanasia. People have their own rights whether or not they are deciding to use Euthanasia. Furthermore, Dr. Peter Saunders believe people should take responsibility for their own death because it would limit their freedom if they cannot control their own life. Euthanasia is useful for having a painless death for people that are suffering. Since this article has a doctor’s point of view on the study it shows that this is an accurate source. The article states many reasons of how Euthanasia can be beneficial. This article explains how Euthanasia will help families cope with their loved ones when they choose

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Alternatives to euthanasia can prevent putting too much power in other hands, and eliminate consequences in the future; therefore, euthanasia should not be legalized. Through the legalization of Euthanasia we will eventually enter a “slippery slope”. One of the biggest concerns with euthanasia is when to cross the line at who can receive euthanasia. As euthanasia progresses more laws and rules are being set to allow more people to receive euthanasia.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this literature review is to highlight the key points of physician-assisted suicide, the legality aspect, the reasons why people opt for euthanasia, and the arguments against this type of live ending action. Materials and Methods Citations…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia should be allowed for competent terminally ill patient to end their suffering, reduce financial issues for hospitals and families, and protect the rights of people in determining their own fate. Assisted death is presented in two different ways, one that is called physician-assisted “suicide” and voluntary active euthanasia. Both suggest a difference in the degree of involvement and behavior. Physician-assisted suicide includes making lethal means available to the patient to be used at a time of the patient’s own choosing. In contrast, voluntary active euthanasia includes the physician taking an active role in carrying out the patient’s request, which would include intravenous delivery of a lethal substance.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of life and death has always been a concept that many people try to avoid, but what happens when a loved one becomes too ill to live? This question has given rise to the idea of euthanasia and Physician-assisted suicide, which although may seem similar, have very different properties. Although physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia both support the belief that one has the right to choose their own fate, the constant backlash in society has limited its practice resulting in the disappearance of a method which, although unorthodox, offer a relief to people suffering from deadly diseases. Euthanasia is “the intentional killing by an act of . . . a dependent human being for his or her benefit” (MCCL.org) and involves two different methods.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the sake of time, I will consider PAS and euthanasia as essentially the same practice. Thus these terms will be used interchangeably, except in citations, which will always use the term stated by the source. I will also avoid the moral or religious arguments against these practices, not because they are invalid, but because the inclusion of such arguments would lengthen this speech beyond the imposed limits. Instead I will argue that legalizing euthanasia, even if initially for a good purpose, leads to severe ethical consequences. These consequences can be summarized as the danger to doctors, the danger to patients, and the danger to…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The pro-euthanasia movement maintains that our rights include determining the time and manner of our own death. Given the fact that people die unexpectedly every day of both natural and accidental causes, this philosophy is patently absurd. If, however, one simply considers the so-called right to choose death when suffering is too great, then we have to ask the question of what kind of suffering qualifies. In contrast, people who disagree to allow euthanasia say that if the choice of euthanasia is considered as good as a decision to receive care, many people will feel guilty for not choosing death.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to talk about the topic of euthanasia. I will argue that active euthanasia is morally permissible in the case of a terminally ill patient who is going through unbearable amounts of pain. Furthermore, the focus of this paper will only be on this type of euthanasia; active euthanasia. However, in the first part of my essay I will not only define what active euthanasia is but I will explain how it differs from other types of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We live in the year 2015, and still it is illegal to grant an individual in need the right to a peaceful departure. Euthanasia offers patients the option to leave their life happier than they would have been otherwise. Furthermore, it is a decision that a patient should be given the right to in times of intense suffering, considering that it is their own life. Finally, the absence of euthanasia has denied so many the end that they have desired through years of…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    After examining all the relevant argument surrounding this topic, it was easy to formulate an opinion supporting voluntary euthanasia in limited circumstances. The contemporary thinker, Peter Singer provides a sound argument that outlines how voluntary euthanasia keeps with the ultimate objective of healthcare. When debating the morality of voluntary euthanasia, it is important to consider why it is morally impermissible to kill a human being. According to Singer, the fact that killing is considered wrong simply because a being is human is not a strong enough reason for it to morally wrong in all situations. This idea that human life is intrinsically valuable stems from religious ideals and is commonly defended using deontology (Singer, “Voluntary” 528).…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Active Euthanasia

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Euthanasia has become a very controversial subject in today’s society. The topic of euthanasia has become a huge debate over the years. There are many different opinions; whether it is ethically correct or not? This subject is important to me, because my grandpa had cancer and passed away from it several years ago. My grandpa knew that the disease had metastasized and he decided to seek palliative care.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is it true that people think it’s not morally right to kill a person, but that it’s morally acceptable to let them die? James Rachels, in “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” argues that there is no moral difference between active and passive euthanasia. He believes that if passive euthanasia is permissible, then active euthanasia should also be. In medical ethics, the distinction between both euthanasias are highly controversial, yet passive euthanasia is accepted and practiced by a majority of doctors. Despite critical conditions to one’s medical case, the majority of people believe active killing is morally worse than letting one die.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the United States and nations worldwide, doctors and physicians are participating in contro-versial practices such as euthanasia. According to the Hippocratic Oath, a pledge in which a phy-sician swears upon, says, “I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel.” However, nations such as the Netherlands, Japan, Germany, and Belgium practice euthanasia on a routine basis. In the United States, not all states support this movement. Yet, states such as Vermont, New Mexico, Oregon, Washington, Montana, and California have legal-ized euthanasia (Vasil).…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Pro Euthanasia

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Euthanasia of humans and physician-assisted suicide are two sides of the same controversial coin. If a person has no chance of returning to their normal life after a physical or mental illness, some say that they should have the right to decide to end their life. This topic is highly debated, both among medical professionals and average citizens. Some think that any form of euthanasia is wrong, no discussion required. They believe that killing someone is murder, without taking in the circumstances surrounding the death or…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This choice is often considered in patients who are diagnosed with illnesses that medical interventions will not be able to cure, but rather only prolong one’s life by treating the pain. It is imperative that we legalize euthanasia as a medical practice that allows medical professionals to help grant their patient 's last wishes. There are two types of euthanasia, the first of which is active euthanasia. This is the process in which a person gives their consent to end their life. Medical professionals attending to their patients would provide the patient with either a lethal dose of medicine or a prescription for a lethal amount to do in their own time.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. The advantages of euthanasia is helping some people from suffering illness to a person. The benefits are shared mainly by the family of the patient since it saves the health costs and reduces the financial burden on them. It would be a great strain for the friends and family to look after someone who is terminally ill so Euthanasia benefits in this way too. The truth we need to accept is that, the medical supplies being used on a terminally ill patient could be used for a patient who is more likely to recover sooner or later.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays