What´s Therapeutic Cloning?

Great Essays
Therapeutic Cloning Although not a very popular topic, the issue of cloning human body parts is very relevant in today’s technological world. In 1996, Dr Ian Wilmut of the Roslin Institute was able to successfully clone a sheep named Dolly. Later, in 1998, Japanese scientists were able to clone mice. By the end of the year 2000, thousands of animals were successfully cloned. In 2001, a human embryo was cloned successfully to a 32 cell stage, before scientists terminated it. Had this experiment continued, a child might have been born with identical DNA to it’s parent. We are capable of cloning, the technology is there, but whether we should exercise this technique on humans or not is an ethical question that has haunted progressive thinkers …show more content…
However there are some types of people called Literalists, who take everything to be written in the bible as literally accurate, including facts like Eve and Adam were the first humans, God actually created earth in seven days, and other improbabilities. These people frequently respond to Therapeutic Cloning in ways that make artificial production of parts seem like stepping into ‘forbidden territory’. God is the only one who creates life, according to literalists. In my studies, many of the opposing arguments were written by literalists, and I feel compelled to rebut their arguments. Therapeutic cloning is, in a literal sense, creating embryos and destroying them. So yes, scientists are extinguishing life, but only to save countless other lives. This is relatable to the production of insulin. Humans use gene therapy and extracted cells to mass produce insulin for diabetes patients. Insulin is not considered to be immoral, even though, yes, literally, life is being destroyed. Another great example is IVF, or vitro fertilisation. This is the process of taking eggs from a woman, and mixing it with sperm in a petri dish, then inserting it back into the woman’s stomach. Does this process sound familiar? It very closely resembles the process of Therapeutic cloning. It’s almost identical. In IVF, several eggs are taken and swirled in a petri dish. Although many are fertilized (creating an embryo), Only one is used, and the rest are discarded, thus killing embryos (American Pregnancy). Why has this been used thousands of times since the 70’s, and is completely acceptable, when therapeutic cloning, which can literally save millions, is considered morally unjustified? What law or religious text says that one combination of genetic material in a flask is okay, when another is not? Many are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The development of cloning technology led to new ways to produce medicine and improving the understanding of genetics. Cloned animals can be used to carry human traits that could lead to new developments in medicine. Also this could lead to human cloning, but this has not been legalized so far due to people's ethics. Although this process lead to a success in Dollie’s case, there…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The possibility of cloning does have its advantages such as cloning organs to replace or repair the damaged ones. Despite the fact of cloning having its advantages, cloning are against the basic beliefs of…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therapeutic cloning also has the potential to cure illnesses that as of now have no cure and take the lives of hundreds of thousands every year. Scientists are able to get stem cells without harming babies,…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the most debated topics in science is the use embryonic stem cells in scientific research. The ethical debate surrounding embryonic stem cell research comes down to two core values that we want to uphold: the alleviation of human suffering and preserving the inherent value of human life. Embryonic stem cell research is such a tricky topic because it requires us to choose between these two core values. We cannot uphold both values because the alleviation of suffering in this case is accomplished by the destruction of a human embryo, which would normally have the potential to develop into a new individual. Thus, we must fully examine both sides of the argument in order to understand the ethical implications of this issue.…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One specific issue with embryonic stem cell research is that human embryos are required to be harvested and destroyed in order to obtain the embryonic stem cells that are vital for research. In the primary source “Ethical and Social Considerations of Embryonic Stem Cell Research” Anne Mclaren, the author of this article and a current English geneticist, bioethicist and graduate of the university of Oxford, describes…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I personally believe that cloning could be both a good and bad thing, and both sides make absolutely great points in their arguments. However, I believe that we should be able to have the choice whether or not we want to contribute to it or if we do not. Nevertheless, I think it depends on the reasoning you have for wanting and/or needing cloning done. I do believe that not all forms are ethically correct. I do agree with therapeutic cloning, as it could help people who may have cancer of a certain organ, that way they can clone the organ and just receive it instead of being put on a waiting list to find a potential match.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Summary/Response: “Human Reproductive Cloning: A Conflict of Liberties.” In this article “Human Reproductive Cloning: A Conflict of Liberties,” Joyce C. Havstad’s conflict is if cloning becomes safe and reliable, people should be able to have reproductive freedom. The author explained that promoters of human cloning know that it may lead to harmful characteristics. Instead of positively promoting human cloning they explain the causes and effects that could take place.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therapeutic cloning provides beneficial purposes in fertilizing eggs that soon would allow solutions to infertility. The in article “Therapeutic cloning will make a commodity of human life” refers to that therapeutic cloning can solve problems in fertilization. “Before the success of in-vitro fertilization, human cloning remained a potential solution to infertility”(Pike 1). This then allows scientist to further research solutions to solving infertility in medical field. This then allows different techniques for therapeutic cloning to arise for the different outcomes of therapeutic cloning.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many religious and conservation organizations find therapeutic cloning unacceptable and unethical, the process can be very rewarding for curing diseases that are otherwise untreatable. Every ten…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therapeutic cloning: A Hopeful chance for Amputees Therapeutic cloning should be available to all patients who desire a second opportunity in exploring their chances at life. Since the advancement in medical technology, doctors and scientists are now able to manipulate the variables in genetic engineering to figure out how to treat patients. In several studies, therapeutic cloning was found most effective for genetic defects like diabetes or neurodegenerative diseases. If further laboratory work were to be set up for other treatments in gene therapy, the possibilities of regenerating the nerves in an amputated limb could lead to a successful growth.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Human Cloning

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    The President's Council on Bio ethics, Human Cloning and…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Furthermore, “because of what cloning is, one cannot presume a future cloned child’s consent to be a clone, even a healthy one. Thus, ethically speaking, we cannot even get to know whether or not human cloning is feasible.” Kass argues that there must be boundaries with what mankind can and cannot…

    • 1315 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bioethics in Medical Research Through the recent years, there has been a lot of controversy on the topic of medical bioethics. They main topics inside of medical bioethics are cloning and gene therapy. Some people agree with cloning and gene therapy saying that it will make the world better and it will help people and society. On the other hand, some people disagree and say that this is unnatural and will mess up society.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is cloning morally wrong? Should it be legal? These questions become more pressing by the day as technology advances. Regardless of society’s opinion on cloning, it is extremely significant and will inevitably become part of our lives. But before we begin, let's define cloning.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genetic Cloning also known as human cloning or Reproductive cloning can be for cures for disease and other health problems. Well for Therapeutic Cloning, also a type of genetic cloning, this takes a genetic material from an adult cell and is then placed inside an egg to grow beneficial stem cells, not to produce a baby. But to allow a patient’s own genetic material to be used to…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays