The Controversial Arguments Of War

As world renowned English author, John Maynard Keynes once said, “When the facts change, I change my mind.”. This thought can be comprehended as opinions change when the honest details and contrasting angles are laid out. As requested by the National Commercial Broadcasting Agency, also known as NCBA, we have conducted an experiment here at Personal Perspective Clinic of Harvard University or PPCHU. Used in this experiment, we took two individuals, one male and one female, from each state of the country. Our assessment is to see by the deadline how many members altered their opinions about the very controversial argument of war. Through music, stories, and personal interview, our Scientist will provide any evidence in our grasp to make views change. As an observation analysis, we established that 50% of our study subjects admitted that war is vital for various reasons, while 50% considered war is nonessential. Of the fifty men tested 95% believed war is …show more content…
All tunes played were anthems of peace. We assigned three pieces, but one melody encountered a rather different response. After playing John Lennon’s ‘Imagine’, we questioned our subjects about their feelings of this song. Our participants, believed the most powerful statement in the tune was when Lennon stated, “Imagine there's no countries. men hard to do. Nothing to kill or die for. And no religion too. Imagine all the people. Living life in peace...”, (A-Z Lyrics). When asked about this statement by Lennon, our subjects believed it hinted the question of ‘Why should we have war?’. With this in mind, we had a decrease of 38% in the group of war is needed, after asking if war is necessary. This result made a first survey total of 12% of the subject’s believe that war is needed, while 88% had beliefs about war is unneeded. With this dramatic change in percent, we believe NCBA should use music to help persuade