Essay On The Controlling Force Of Rome In Coriolanus And Julius Caesar

Improved Essays
The first point discussed in Marta Cerezo Moreno’s The Controlling Force of Rome in Coriolanus and Julius Caesar is how Rome does not function as just a location where the play is set, but in fact the framework of the plots would collapse because the plot is directly related to the location. The city of Rome is constantly attacked by the Volscians in Corialanus, defended by the plebeians, praised by its people and feared by its enemies. Rome is symbolic of the characters Corialanus and Julius Caesar. Corialanus was feared by the people that helped kill him at the end of the story and ruin his life when he was alive. He was also praised by the people for his work in protecting Rome. Julius Caesar also expresses same traits as Rome as Rome was the all-powerful …show more content…
Rome was also a power structure that controlled the protagonists’ actions, thoughts, and eventual fate. In Coriolanus, the power structure within Rome leads to his demise as he was unable to achieve support as he was not a politician that could use smart rhetoric, but in fact got his words twisted. Coriolanus would also try and achieve his own self-thought and independence between the way Rome is structured, he was trying to get something that was impossible to get. “ In the case of Julius Caesar, the impelling force of Rome opposes the characters’ attempt to create and manipulate a reality that works against the codes of behaviour of the city,” (Moreno, The Controlling Force of Rome in Coriolanus and Julius Caesar). I completely agree with the statement this author made and what she is trying to say is that Rome is so strong that in order to get power you must form a false reality that will hurt others and help you. However, you must also be able to interpret when someone else is trying to get you to believe something that is not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    While some of them feared for their own power in the government, others, like Brutus, feared for the people of the Republic and their safety. Caesar’s ambition, which has a negative connotation in the play, lead, “some of the senators [to] believe that Caesar [was] an overly ambitious man, making him a candidate for assassination” (Anne Marie Hacht 345). In the end, ambition and conspiracy are seen in the play as well as in history, wreaking havoc as they lead to the death of Caesar, a supposedly too ambitious man, as well as many other people in the…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Through the duration of the play Brutus kills Caesar because that is what he decides is best for Rome and its democracy. One gets glimpses of the internal struggles of Brutus in the play as he strives for his perfect idea of Rome. The author makes the point throughout the play to present a character’s inner turmoil directly through dramatic devices. In this…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    43). This only increased the fear that Caesar was going to tarnish the reputation of their government. These men also feared that Caesar would move the capital closer to his mistress, again damaging Italy as a whole. As well as the proposed celebration of slavery lead to the conspiracy of his murder. Equally as important, Caesar’s failure to expose these rumors, and deny the accusations of ruining Rome ultimately led to his own…

    • 1862 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Brutus was a nobleman, Cassius was going to need a legitimate reason for wanting to kill Caesar. He goes through the entire speech trying to display how the abundance of power was going to corrupt Caesar. Cassius uses claim of policy in his speech, it is given with the intention of persuading Brutus to help him remove Caesars power. He uses Brutus’s concern for the greater good to make him believe caesar is becoming a tyrant. Cassius uses an immense amount of support in his speech, he knows it won't be easy to convince Brutus.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the conspirators wrote fake letters to him, became conflicted with himself. He had to choose between his loyalty to Rome and his loyalty to his friend. Since he naively believed the letters were real, he decided that his loyalty would go to Rome and joined the conspirators. Once he joined them, they used him to kill Caesar. His tragic flaw of poor judgement showed when he was taken advantage of by Antony.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Republic Analysis

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He opposed Caesar and sided with Pompey and the senate during the Civil War. Caesar set himself as a dictator and Cicero didn’t like that he had considered himself a dictator. Cicero opposed Julius Caesar and when he spoke out about Caesar, Caesar found out and sent soldiers to arrest him so he fled Rome. It was obvious Cicero didn’t like the rule of one man and spoke strong about the nobility of a republican form of government in Rome. Therefore when Caesar announced his dictatorship it was obvious Cicero didn’t care for it.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All of this maybe true, however, can taking over Rome and ruling the world be morally justified reasoning for love and attraction. Having followers and having people trust you is a good thing, but it’s not good when they are on your side for any step that you take. For instance, during Antony’s speech, when he tries to get the people of Rome to kill the conspirators for their wrong-doings. But before they even could, the conspirators had already fled from Rome. Furthermore, they had killed Cinna the poet because he had a name similar to the name of one of the conspirators who had killed Caesar; Cinna.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He wanted what was best for Rome to be successful, but he also didn’t want to murder Caesar. Brutus, however, saw through Caesar into the parts that no one else could see. Brutus was saying that he never knew Caesar to let his emotions affect his reasoning. But, when Caesar gets to the top, he scorns the ones who helped him get there. This, is why Brutus thought that, for the good of Rome, he may have to kill Caesar.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the positive side, killing Caesar would help preserve the democracy that Junius Brutus set up. In the words of Alice Shalvi in “Brutus’s Personal Failure is the Central Tragedy”, “Marcus Brutus fears the threat to Rome’s liberty which is implied in Caesar’s desire for kingship and autocratic rule”(Shalvi 71). On the negative side, killing Caesar would mean he was killing his best friend. “Since Cassius first did whet me against Caesar, I have not slept. Between the acting of a dreadful thing and the first motion all the interim is like a phantasma, or a hideous dream”(II.i.61-65).…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Essay Chaos will strike across the whole city of Rome after the ruler is killed by a dangerous mob. This occurs in the tragic play, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, which follows the lives of Caesar and the conspirators before and after Caesar's death. Chaos erupts when the conspirators manipulate Brutus into killing Julius Caesar for the good of Rome. Manipulation by clever people occurs many times in the play. In the beginning Cassius realizes Brutus can be persuaded when Cassius says, “Thy honorable mettle may be wrought” (1.2.302).…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays