Argumentative Essay: The Effects Of Regulation Laws

Improved Essays
The effects of regulation laws are intensive and extensive although they don’t altogether deter individuals from effort a gun. The Brady side arm management Act created it more and more harder and making an attempt method to get and own a gun. regulation advocates say this is often not enough, that though gun connected incidents have declined since its enactment harder laws square measure required or additional acts of gun violence can still plague the state. Pro-gun advocates see regulation laws as solely some way for the govt to manage its voters. the $64000 dialogue, for either side, comes all the way down to WHO ought to own a gun and beneath what restrictions ought to they be ready to possess it?

This is a very important question to everybody concerned within the issue, and intensely necessary to society as a full. Guns play a job in everyone’s lives to some extent, whether or not it 's your own personal possession of a looking rifle or a firearm within the hands of a youth in your neighborhood. we tend to as Americans price our rights to freedoms granted to USA by our forefathers, which incorporates the possession of firearms as explicit within the Second change. As voters we tend to should raise ourselves; will we really need regulation laws that square measure created to safeguard USA, to require away our basic rights as citizens?
…show more content…
it 's not merely one among professional-gun/anti-gun however rather is one that transcends the same old pro and con dialogue to become a national issue on variety of levels and approaches, 3 in specific, all with totally different interests and views. These approaches embody the political approach the social approach and also the guilt

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Katrina Herrera Mrs. Clark AP English 3 08 February 2018 Argumentative Essay Final Draft: Gun Control Gun control is one of the most controversial topics in American politics. More than one-third of Americans in the United States own firearms in their households. It is estimated that more than thirty-thousand people are shot each year due to murders, accidents, police intervention, suicide attempts and suicide. Gun control laws are not strict enough for the safety of our society. The purchase and possession of firearms should be banned in order to prevent potential public shootings, protect the environment, and decrease suicide and death rates.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    takes an analytical approach to both sides of the debate. The skyrocketing rise in interest groups advocating on enforcing tougher firearm policies can be attributed to the incremented insecurities within public places, such as the ones mentioned in the documentary. There are no precise demands proclaimed by these advocates for the exception of “tougher firearm policies.” The theory behind their reasoning is that the implementation of tougher firearm policies would subsequently reduce the number of firearms in the streets and thus lower the probability of disasters like the Columbine and Sandy Hook school tragedies. However in similar fashion, the rise in awareness for the interest group advocating the passionate defense of the American’s right to bear arms, known as the N.R.A. (National Rifle Association), has captivated the American political scene and continues to heavily derail this theory by proclaiming their own.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The article “Guns a Loaded Argument” by Paul Rosenzweig argues his interpretation of the popular controversy over gun laws in the United States. The author Paul Rosenzweig is an adjunct professor of law at George Mason University. He is also the senior legal research colleague in the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, the website in which the article is available. The Heritage Foundation is a research and informative institution that publicizes conservative policy topics that support the principle ideas that the foundation stands for. The author has written this article for a mainly conservative audience of readers to allow people more insight into the intricate issues of gun control.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kellerman, Arthur L., and Frederick P. Rivara. (2013 Feb., 13)"Silencing the Silence on Gun Research.". This article examines the purposes of firearm control and how the late shootings have not restricted weapons. This source is dependable it gives realities and foundation on how gun laws can influence society.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Annotated Bibliography: Gun Control Everyone has their opinion over Guns, many believe it’s ok to have guns but others disagree. But many have guns for protection, I understand people abuse the power on having guns and commit a crime. Many shootings have occurred this year and last year.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order for gun control to be implemented, laws need to passed. Such laws would include mandatory background checks for the purchase of a firearm, a ban of handguns, or a ban of gun accessories like high capacity magazines and silencers. With the apparently recent rise of gun violence, some Americans blame guns and the lack of gun control for these acts of gun violence. Notably, gun control advocates argue that laws need to be implemented to prevent such atrocities; as there are many people who want gun control to implemented, there are just as many people who claim some of these laws are unconstitutional, ineffective and may only allow for more gun violence in the near future. Indeed, the implementation of Gun Control faces extreme opposition from flatlined gun violence rates, powerful lobby groups, the potential for guns to save lives, and the economic/social importance of guns.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Firearms act of 1934 greatly restricted the purchase of automatic weapons, rifles, and shotguns (Cottrol 67). The people of the United States felt a sense of relief when an initial precedent was set for the Second Amendment. This was one of the first acts restricting the purchase of weapons, this was seen as the first action taken by the government to begin a trend of gun control (Cottrol 67). Gun control means political efforts to regulate the manufacture, sale, possession, and use of various types of firearms (“Gun Control”). When the government took action and in a way initially supported the side of viewing the amendment as a collective right it took the disagreement between the two sides to a new level.…

    • 2106 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In discussions of the Second Amendment, one controversial issue has been whether the Founding Fathers considered the future use of guns. On the one hand, the federal government argues for stricter regulations towards people who bear arms. On the contrary, the people of the state contend that our rights shall not be infringed. With respect to both parties, stricter gun laws are needed to protect American’s from massacres. Guns were created for one purpose and one purpose only, to kill.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rachel Bortnik Dr. Ted Vaggalis PHIL 316: Ethics 8 December 2017 Society’s Rights and Happiness Concerning Guns In Jeff McMahan’s essay, Why Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough, he argues for a ban on societies gun ownership—except for police and military services are still allowed to handle a gun. The purpose of McMahan’s argument is to resolve the danger guns cause in societies environment and the issue of guns being in the wrong hands. McMahan focuses on both the anti-gun advocates and the gun advocates disagreement of why or why not guns needs to be banned. Many scenarios are presented from both points of views.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Brady Campaign presents the cons of lenient gun laws by showing emotion and statistics on their website in several ways: “ Of the 33,000 people who die from gun violence in this country, how many could be saved? “ and “ Gun Violence Takes A Massive Toll on American Children “. This presents credibility towards the gun control advocate group as they are able to provide information that can change the society's view on gun control. By providing this information, we are able to understand that this group’s incentive is pressured by the amount of deaths caused by guns. Brady Campaign appeals to society as they persuade you that by enforcing stricter gun laws, you are able to save more lives.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Research Paper

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An incendiary debate has been sparked regarding current gun control legislation in the United States, because approximately 30,000 United States citizens lose their lives to gun-related crime and injury every year (Terror). The question is whether gun control laws should be strengthened to make it harder for potential criminals to possess weapons or kept the same to preserve the rights of the United States citizens. Gun control opponents believe that the answer to this problem is to loosen gun control laws to dissuade potential shooters. Gun control proponents believe that the answer is to tighten gun control laws so that a gun is never put into a potential shooter’s hands. To examine this issue, one must carefully ponder different points of…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns Laws Must Be Changed The debate on new gun legislation at the federal and national levels is roaring topic in today’s American society. On one side of the argument, “gun lovers” constantly make mention of the second amendment and how the law protects the rights of Americans. On the other side of the argument, Americans expecting gun reforms argue new and clearer laws will be preferable for the future of America. Nevertheless, on both sides the truth of the matter is in the statistical evidence of gun violence and gun accessibility.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past few decades, firearms have had a big impact on society. These impacts have been both good and evil, and have caused controversy on the topic of gun ownership. Some groups, such as the Brady Campaign, would like to see gun control laws take away some rights and restrict others, whereas the National Rifle Association would like to protect gun rights and educate society on the use of firearms. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety. Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote an article titled “Our Blind Spot about Guns,” which was published in The New York Times in 2014. In the article’s context, he “argues that if guns and their owners were regulated in the same way that cars and their drivers are, thousands of lives could be saved each year” (Kristof 161). He incorporates multiple statistics in his essay, provides us with insights from the opposing side, and compares the issue of gun control to one that occurred a century ago: vehicle control. Just in the first two paragraphs, Kristof does not cease to use startling statistics that he is sure will grab our attention. He brings to light the issue of 1921 when vehicle regulations were non-existent which, therefore, contributed to the issue of high fatality rates.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics