Constitution's Involvement In The Failure Of The Union

Great Essays
The Constitution’s Involvement in the Failure of the Union By the 1850’s the Constitution, originally created as a document that would unify a new, developing nation, had become the source of sectional discord and tension among the United States and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it had created. When the framers of the Constitution neglected to mention slavery in any way, they left the idea of slavery up for interpretation, which further separated the North and South due to their different ideals and aspirations. The South had become completely dependent on slavery for their cotton kingdom, and the North had converted to the factory system. The nation had become more divided through may bad compromises and amendments …show more content…
He stated in his address on The Fugitive Slave Law on May 3, 1851, “ The (Fugitive Slave Law) is a statute which enacts the crime of kidnapping,--a crime on one footing with arson and murder. A man’s right to liberty is as inalienable as his right to life…” Ralph Waldo Emerson viewed this law as kidnapping, which is considered a similar crime to arson and murder. Most northerners also shared this view on the Fugitive Slave Act. Emerson also states in his address on The Fugitive Slave Law, “But one thing appears certain to me, that, as soon as the Constitution ordains an immoral law, it ordains disunion.” Emerson is saying that the Compromise of 1850 was supposed to be a compromise and one of its main provisions, the Fugitive Slave Act., was an immoral law that created more turmoil and more separation between the North and South. The Constitution’s lack of permanently addressing and specifically identifying the laws on slavery enabled this split between the North and South. Due to this spilt, the Compromise of 1850 was created as an effort to unite the nation again, but this created further separation and made it nearly impossible for the North and South to agree or prevent a civil …show more content…
When a state secedes, it immediate divides the nation. After South Carolina seceded in 1860 the other southern states soon followed, making it impossible for the union to reunite. This permanent separation lead to the creation of the Confederate States of America, and the North and South were now two separate countries permanently divided. The Constitution did not have the power to prevent this, and therefore failed to keep the Union together. President Abraham Lincoln said in his message to Congress on July 4, 1861, “The sophism itself is, that any state of the Union may, consistently with the national Constitution, and therefore lawfully, and peacefully, withdraw from the Union, without the consent of the Union, or of any other state.” President Lincoln is saying that he does not have the power to stop the Union from dissolving because the Constitution does not give it to him. Under the Constitution a state can secede from the Union peacefully without the approval of the President or any other state. In other words, the Constitution can not hold the Union together. This is another example of how the Constitution ultimately contributed to the failure of the Union.
Overall, the lack or clarity in the Constitution lead to the failure of the Union. The Constitution left slavery and state’s right, two of the countries most controversial topics, open

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Slavery and Westward Expansion had a very volatile relationship in the Antebellum era America and would contribute to the American Civil War. Westward expansion and the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be a way to preserve unity within the Union, but over the next 30 years, ties between the Northern and Southern states would be strained as more territory is gained and the question regarding slavery’s place within these new lands. Through an analysis of book and article sources, one gains the idea that Westward expansion, slavery, and the place of Africans and their rights would continue to tear away at the union until it was ripped apart when South Carolina secedes from the Union and is followed by six more states after the election of President…

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He denied that a state could secede, but he also declared that the federal…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The addition of a stricter fugitive slave law in the compromise of 1850 was a bill that enraged the citizens of the North. Before this point slavery was, for the most part, isolated in the South and some new territories. Now with the new stricter fugitive slave laws, northern citizens were forced to help officials capture fugitive slaves and return them to the South. This was seen as an invasion of their rights, especially since most Northerners opposed slavery in the first place. It became progressively difficult for Northerners to keep the practice of slavery out of the North; this was especially true with the Dred Scott decision in 1857.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    1820 To 1860 Dbq Essay

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The period in American history from 1820 to 1860 lead to a divided nation on the brink of a civil war. One thing dividing the nation of America between 1820 and 1860 was the rise of many different political parties and the issue of states’ rights. Each politician was working for he advancement of the same country, yet had wildly different beliefs. For example, Senator John C. Calhoun of SOuth Carolina said, “We of the South will not, cannot, surrender our institutions,” when talking about slavery (Document A). While he was preaching the continuation with slavery, Democratic Congressman David Wilmot from Pennsylvania said, “The issue now presented is not whether slavery shall exist unmolested where it now is, but whether it shall be carried to new and distant regions, now free, where the footprint of a slave cannot be found” (Documented B).…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Nation Divided In 1787, the Constitution was written to “form a more perfect union” out of America, although that didn’t last very long. In the early to mid 1800s, the US was divided; the northern area didn’t support slavery while the southern area did. That was just one of many things they disagreed upon. Because of these differences, they divided between the Union(north) and the Confederacy(south).…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln Memorial Dbq

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Due to the seceding south, Lincoln fought to bring unity back to the broken…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Long-Term Effects Of Slavery

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages

    1. Describe and explain how slavery affected the economic, social, and political development of the South during the first half of the nineteenth century. Why did Slavery become the essential difference between the North and the South? What are the long-term effects of slavery?…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For the majority of American History leading up to the Civil War, civilians had been divided over the issue of slavery and politics. The nation had a long history of compromise that seemed necessary to keep the nation unified. Most of these compromises avoided the issue of slavery, as politicians and “great compromisers” like Henry Clay aimed to prevent the inevitable split between the North and South. There was a turning point, however, in the North and South, when compromise was no longer an option. Although the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was the immediate and final trigger for southern secession, other attributes including the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Bleeding Kansas, and the Dred Scott decision of 1857 drove the South further towards…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Dbq Essay

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The legality of secession is an argument still hotly debated in the United States today. In light of the recent presidential election, the issue has resurfaced with vigor; states on the west coast, for example, have proposed a secession from the Union under the name “Cascadia.” The same argument was made in the years leading up to the the civil war of the late 1800s, during which Southern states relinquished their membership of the Union. I would argue, however, that the southerners had no constitutional right to secede and that the view of secession as a legal right is a flawed one. Despite having “seceded” from Britain years prior, the states during the civil war had no legal right to secede from the Union as they had agreed to follow the…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Constitution never said that having slaves was acceptable but abolitionists thought that slavery was a sin. It was said that “the abolitionists movement not only caused conflict over whether slavery should be abolished but was a major factor in bringing about the Civil War” (Bolotin 1). Slavery divided the North and the South but so did sectionalism. Sectionalism is defined as “loyalty to a state or section, rather than to the country as a whole” (Prentice…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the drafting of the Constitution, the ideals and philosophy behind the ideas of human rights were twisted and molded to fit the needs of both the northern and southern representatives. Considering the issue of black rights during the 18th century, the dilemma between the 2 sides was balancing on a fair. Taking into account that the north was predominantly antislavery and the south was pro-slavery, without meeting an ultimatum, the Constitution would not for the United States. The southern economy was based off of the revenue the free slave labor provided to them and the boost in a population count. The northern states contrasting with the south refused to take any of these benefits of slavery based off of the people 's ethical beliefs.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The North wanted America to remain as a whole, however, the South wanted separation from the union so that they could expand on slavery. The Federal Government look at the actions of the South as if the south was trying to assert authority over the government so that they could abolish laws that they did not agree with. The Federal Government did not like that one bit, and this is when tension started to build. The south tried expanding their territory into the north in order to build strength, however, the north had more money, and resources. The Gold Rush sprung into action which caused many immigrants to move west, completely eliminating the chances of the south making Western states into slave states.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Essay

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Northern states and the Southern states had their differences in their beliefs, on profuse occasions—specifically on slavery—compromises had squelch down the bad blood between them. However, in 1789, even after the Constitution was adopted by all of the States to amalgamate as a nation, for more than thirty years, the temporarily ceased frictions between the North and South went to and fro once more. Thus, by 1861, these opposing ideals between the disputants were so prodigious that the compromises do not seem enticing to either antithetical stance. Henceforth, this led to the secession of the Southern states, much to the Northern states’ disgust and eventually to the Civil War.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As The United states began a time of expansion into the west in the late 1830’s, debates over whether or not slavery would be permitted in those territories vacated by the native Americans caused great disagreements in Government and Society. While slavery is the most obvious reason for succession, Westward expansion and the rights of the new states were responsible for much of the violent conflicts that lead to the Civil War. States struggled to find common ground, but the differences between North and South and new Immigration made A series of compromises were created but by 1860 compromise had failed. Southerners feared an increase in free states would create an imbalance of power and create an advantage to the abolition of slavery.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction During the 1800s the North and South came to a crossroads; their outlooks on slavery were rather diverse. The South did not wish to lose its moneymaking, comfortable, and rapacious slavery industry, especially plantation slavery. However, on the other hand, the North was rising up with a sense of conviction toward the nature of slavery. The South pursued the expansion of slavery and the North sought its abolishment. Slavery was the most disputed subject in that time.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays