Moral Values In Ireland: The Constitution And The Constitution

Great Essays
In Ireland, Bunreacht na hEireann is the footing for the State’s law. The Constitution is an embodiment of the values shared by the people of the Irish Free State, at the time it was written in 1937. The State must govern the people in accordance with these values. These values set boundaries for the honourable man to follow. It generally accepted that, it is right and just to discipline an individual living in Ireland, if he/she breaks the law. For a civilised country, it is vital to have common moral values in place, to set a standard that will be tolerated nationwide. Although the Law and morality are not complete reflections of one another, the law often has a moral grounding, which shows that a relationship is present. The relationship between moral values being the groundwork for the Constitution and the Constitution being the groundwork for the law is important to identify. The symbiotic aspect of this relationship gives rise to my question: Can there be law without moral values? …show more content…
The law enforces penalties upon those who commit murder, tainting this act as unforgivable. This moral value of human life has been adopted by most societies, and is generally accepted and embraced. Yet, there are instances where individuals do not agree with particular moral visions protected by law that will be later

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation..…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal punishment is an immensely ongoing controversial and societal issue in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world. There are thirty-one states that have kept the death penalty as a legal punishment and nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty, including New Jersey in 2007. Statistics show that 39 percent choose life without parole plus restitution, 33 percent would choose Capital Punishment, 13 percent chose life without parole, 9 percent picked life with parole, and 6 percent had no opinion. One of the main reasons people are pro death penalty is because it gives closure to the victim’s family. Defenders think that “taking an offender 's life is a more severe punishment than any prison life term.”…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Regal T., 1985, p.35) Tom Regan believes that in terms of utilitarianism, such murder can be justified, so, he also rejects it as an inadequate theory. Regan eventually concludes that none of them can be correct, and offers the most satisfactory theory in his view, that is the rights view. (Regal T., 1985, p.36) This theory is based on the concept of intrinsic value. The author…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not all the cases with death sentences is right, “I don't want to put one innocent person to death to put 99 that are guilty to death,” said Gary Johnson (Johnson 1). In addition, the cost of it is also excessively expensive; therefore, this solution is not as good as its definition. The death penalty has its impacts to the criminal behavior of people as the result of reducing crime rates since it was re-instituted. One can say keep it but only for a symbol. Life is precious, and no one has the right to end other’s…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doctor-assisted suicide is an issue that should be brought to the eyes of the public regarding just how big of an impact it has on medicine and how it could corrupt the medicinal practice, how it creates a conflicting battle between human morals and ethical practices, and finally the manner in which it violates human dignity Background/Overview Doctor-assisted suicide (also known as Physician-assisted suicide or PAS) is defined as “suicide by a patient facilitated by means (as a drug prescription) or by information (as an indication of a lethal dosage) provided by a physician aware of the patient's intent (Merriam Webster Dictionary). Despite most of the world, with the exception of Netherlands and Canada making the act legal, this practice remains illegal in other corners of the globe. The U.S. Constitution explicitly states…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty The Death penalty is a highly controversial topic in present day politics. The public is concerned with how America’s most dangerous criminals are held responsible for their crimes as well as how they will be kept from harming others. It’s reasonable to want a mass murderer to be punished in a manner that removes further threat, but is it our place to decide if his or her life should be ended? In other words, is it moral for society to prescribe murder as retribution for murder?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephen Nathanson’s argument in “An Eye for an Eye?” stresses the need to do away with the ultimate form of punishment; the death penalty. Nathanson compares the ancient principle of equal retaliation to the current idea of capital punishment. He provides moral arguments for preserving the sanctity of human life as he points out the flaws with murdering killers. The views of other scholars of philosophy are cited by Nathanson and then analyzed for their invalid points. Nathanson first describes the problems with the lex talionis principle, or the idea of “an eye for an eye”.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “When it comes to murder, you can’t respect grief. Or privacy. Or personal feelings” (85). The author uses the repetition of the word “or” to begin two sentences that effectively emphasize the sensitivity of the Clutters’ murder. Anaphora is used to appeal to the audience and generate a particular effect of understanding on them.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is a controversial topic which receives a great deal of criticism from parties on both sides of the argument. Some suggest that it is morally sound on the basis of an eye-for-an-eye ideology, while others argue that its inherent hypocrisy makes the act illegitimate. By examining and analyzing Igor Primoratz’s A Life for a Life and its argument in support of the death penalty, I will attempt to both explain and discredit his argument on the grounds that murder ought not justify murder. Igor Primoratz’s central argument is that there is no equivalent punishment to murder, which is why in cases of murder, the death penalty is justified. Simply imprisoning someone who committed such a heinous crime as murder does not equate…

    • 1621 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1985, The New Republic released Edward I. Koch ’s essay entitled “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” to the public. This essay 's purpose was to sway readers towards a new perspective that affirms the morality and validity of capital punishment. While the article seems effective at first glance, upon further inspection the holes in its message start to become clear. For this very reason, Koch’s essay is a convincing article, yet riddled with logical fallacies and self-contradictions.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Murder Is Murder Wrong

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although the idea of murder may seem unjust to us, some societies believe murder is an acceptable behavior. Professor of Philosophy, James Rachels, states that “morality differs from one culture to another. ”This concept is widely known as Cultural Relativism. Even though murder is a controversial topic around the world; I truly believe murder is wrong no matter what because of society’s moral code, sixth commandants, and desire for survival. Murder is considered one of the most serious criminal offenses in the moral code of our society.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This asserts that the wrongness of killing drives from the unproblematic assumption that killing you or me is prima facie wrong. Furthermore, the reason killing you or me is wrong is because, as victims of death, we would assume the greatest possible loss of any conceivable crime. That is the loss of our future; our future holds every activity, project, experience, and enjoyment that we will ever have. Marquis continues that the…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Crime and Punishment in America through the Years Crime and punishment in the United States of America has changed through the years’ time and time again. Presidents through time, as well as the American population, have been the cause for all the “see-sawing” between crime and punishment. Most of the recent back and forth comes from the human interpretation of what a “cruel and unusual punishment” is, and from the questions of justification for the state taking a life. These questions date back to 1767 when Cesare Beccaria’s published “Crime and Punishment,” an essay which helped abolitionists show their voice and views on capital punishment.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most debated ethical issues throughout the entire history of man, has been capital punishment (death penalty). Is it necessary, and more importantly, is it moral to put someone to death for a crime which they have committed? This questions has been raised and debated in every country and at every period of time, as far back as known history will allow us to observe. This paper will present and discuss the dilemma of capital punishment on ethical grounds and present arguments both for and against capital punishment. This paper will also look at the history and evolution of capital punishment, as well as attempt to gauge what will become of the practice in the foreseeable future.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays