• Home Page
  • The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Analysis

The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Analysis

Improved Essays
Show More
Protects Against Tyranny
Had The Constitution not guarded against tyranny, society as we know it today would be very different. James Madison tried to create a better law system because the Articles of Confederation did not support their government. The cause of their weakness lies in the fact that they did not have a court system nor a Chief Justice. While writing The Constitution, Madison’s biggest concern was that one branch or person was going to have power over the other branches. If that would have happened it would have led way to tyranny. How exactly did The Constitution guard against tyranny? The Constitution guarded against tyranny through Federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances and big states versus small states.
Federalism was included in The Constitution to prevent tyranny. As stated by James Madison, “The power surrendered by the people …show more content…
The system prevents tyranny by allowing each of the three branches to not only have power over themselves but to have power over the other branches. In case of a branch becoming too powerful the other branches can check the power to ensure equal power between the three branches. For example, if the president (Executive Branch) were to veto a law that the Legislative Branch felt was needed they could override the president’s veto to ensure that the president doesn’t get to powerful and do away with a good law. As stated by James Madison the system of checks and balances main role is to “divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other” (James Madison Federalist Paper #51, 1788). In addition to this James Madison also quotes that the three branches “have no constitutional control over each other” (James Madison Federalist Paper #51, 1788). Checks and balances prevented tyranny from occurring because it allowed each branch to have equal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Protection Against Tyranny
    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Protection Against Tyranny

    Unfair, cruel ruling and no freedom, how would you like to have a government that follows these set of rules? This is what it would be like to have tyranny in the United States government. This is what it would be like without the creation of the constitution.The first guard against tyranny was federalism, which is federal, state and local government. Another protection against tyranny was separation of powers which made three main branches of government, judicial ,executive and legislative. One of the last guards against it is checks and balances which makes sure the different branches are using their power correctly and if they’re not then the others can check them for it.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Federalists Vs Anti Federalists
    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Federalists Vs Anti Federalists

    They argued that the government would need to use force to keep its people in line, the necessary and proper clause was dangerous and that a bill of rights was necessary. The Anti-Federalists did not believe a national government could exist at that time without military force. They said in column 1, box 2 of the “Positions of the Constitution” paper that “The national government would be located too far from most people’s communities to allow them to participate...the only way the government would be able to rule would be through the use of military force.” This Anti-Federalist quote explains that communication was not good enough to keep everyone informed about elections, laws and national news. The Anti-Federalists were afraid of this since that is not unlike what King George did when he introduced The Quartering Act or closed down boston harbor after the boston tea party. The Anti-Federalists thought that the new government would turn into a tyranny.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    A New Democracy Dbq Analysis
    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A New Democracy Dbq Analysis

    They had created the Constitution, but the had one question. How did the constitution guard against tyranny? Tyranny by definition is a person or group from having or getting too much power. They made the constitution prevents this tyranny by having four major ideas. Those ideas are federalism, Separation of powers, checks and balances, and finally equal representation in congress.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Anti Federalist Approach Analysis
    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anti Federalist Approach Analysis

    Anti-Federalists fought for a Bill of Rights to be included within the Constitutional framework governing the federal government so as to explicitly codify individual rights under the law. Their skepticism regarding the nature of government recognized state action and the liberties of the individual citizen are typically antithetical in nature and in need of explicit protection. Some Federalists on the other hand were actually fearful of such methods, worrying that explicitly listing the rights of the individual was an inherently limiting approach to liberty – with the idea that those which were not listed were not fundamentally retained by the people. James Madison stated, “[T]he government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. It is not like the state governments, whose powers are more general.” James Madison original position prior to Constitutional ratification and the inclusion of the Bill of Rights was that the Constitution inherently restricted the powers of the national government to those that were clearly defined.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against The Bill Of Rights
    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Arguments Against The Bill Of Rights

    During the ratification debates of the US Constitution, there was conversation over the necessity of a bill of rights to define people’s rights and limit the government’s powers. Many federalists believed such a bill of rights would not only be unnecessary, but would weaken the constitution and the people, and give the government powers they should have. Noah Webster, Alexander Hamilton, and James Wilson each make arguments against a bill of rights. Webster argues that a bill of rights may be irrelevant in future generations, but people will be reluctant to change or add to it. Hamilton believes that the bill of rights is unnecessary because the constitution itself is in terms a bill of rights.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Analysis
    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Analysis

    The Constitution’s guard against tyranny was very powerful. The guard was set to protect the states and individuals from the government having absolute power. If the Constitution was not intact, the government would absolutely use their powers to their benefit because they would be untouchable. The Constitution has many ways of abolishing tyranny and making it hard for the people in power to take advantage of it. The Constitution does help against government having absolute power, mainly because issues laws that contain rights for its citizens.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Constitution Vs Tyranny
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Constitution Vs Tyranny

    Constitution v. Tyranny The constitution is the Americans way to fight against tyranny. In 1787 when the constitution was written, the Americans wanted to protect the new nation from allowing one or few people from taking total power. This is known as tyranny. How did the constitution guard against tyranny? By using separations of powers and checks and balances, the constitution protects the nation against tyranny.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Should The Supreme Court Have The Power Of The Executive Branch Essay
    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should The Supreme Court Have The Power Of The Executive Branch Essay

    The legislative branch has the power to control tax and money, while the executive branch can make law and control the army. It would be overpowered if they would give them the power to overturn the unconstitutional federal law. It’s unfair to give the legislature judicial review. Each branch should have their power. No other branches act will go against the constitution is acceptable.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Democratic-Republicans And Anti-Federalists
    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Democratic-Republicans And Anti-Federalists

    Jefferson, an anti-Federalist, opposed the Constitution, arguing that it will destroy the unalienable rights of man. Federalists interpreted the Constitution with a loose construction, meaning that the government should be allowed to exercise many implied powers for the public good (Hamilton). The National Bank, created by Hamilton, was an example of implementing a loose construction because the Constitution did not specifically mentioned whether the government was allowed to do so. The National Bank provided a safe place for people to deposit money and loans for the states and the government to pay off debts. Democratic-Republicans believed that those implied powers belong to the states or to the people to decide whether laws should be made to prohibit something (Jefferson).…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Self Government Research Paper
    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Self Government Research Paper

    For example, the Executive branch of government can veto a bill from the Legislative branch of government, however, the Legislative Branch has the ability to override the veto. Checks and Balances are a great thing, it does indeed keep all the branches in their departments with limits on power. Any branch of government that exceeds its’ limits of power, can be harmful for the country. Another example of checks and balances is with the president, the president can declare war at any time, however, Congress decides if America actually goes to war. The system of checks and balances helps to protect the best interest of the people and the United States as a whole.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  CA Privacy Policy |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings