The Constitution Cannot Change With Society

Improved Essays
The Constitution should be interpreted literally and cannot change with society. Explain the topic and either agree or disagree with the statement, offering support to the argument.

Saying that the constitution should be taken literally and that it cannot change with society is in my opinion unrealistic . When the constitution was written the world was a very different place than it is today so saying that it is to be taken literally and that it cannot change is very unrealistic. The problems that we encounter in today's society cannot be held to the standards of what they were when the constitution was first written. Inorder for something like the constitution to still be effective it needs to be able to change with the times and current

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Constitution of United States of America was designed for the people to be able for the political view of the United States. The Constitution is defined as a body of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is acknowledged to be governed. The political view is based on the people for the…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the summer of 1787, the United States was challenged to create a stronger central government without letting one person or group have too much power. There were flaws in the Articles of Confederation and the government wasn’t getting anything done. The fifty-five representatives wanted to create a Constitution that divided up powers to avoid the tyranny that they escaped from by becoming an independent nation. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in many ways, such as Federalism, creating equality for big and small states, separation of powers by creation of branches, and checks and balance between the branches.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Under America’s first governing document, the Articles of Confederation, the national government grew weak and states operated like independent countries. In response to this the delegates at the 1787 convention which was originally set to ratify the Articles of Confederation devised a plan for a stronger federal government with three branches–executive, legislative and judicial–along with a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch would ever gain too much power. The U.S. Constitution established America’s national government and fundamental laws, while guaranteeing that certain basic rights for its citizens would be established and protected. It was signed on September 17, 1787, by delegates to the Constitutional Convention…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After reading the constitution, the constitution that the delegates crafted, should not be ratified. When the delegates of each state were in the process of creating the constitution, they forgot about the citizens…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Constitution can be considered a very controversial topic in regards to our government. The Constitution is used to divide power between the federal government and the states. It is used also to protect the individual liberties of the American citizens. In the article The Ratification Referendum by Sanford Levinson, he discusses how the U.S constitution is flawed in many ways. He argues that Americans should have the opportunity to vote on whether congress should draft a new constitution .…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The proposed Constitution should be ratified because it calls for unity among the states and it prevents tyranny. The Constitution also worked to prevent oppressive rule. James Madison…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Strict Interpretation of the Constitution Strict interpretation means that the Constitution must explicitly grant a power or privilege in order for that action to be legal. A loose interpretation doesn’t give any safeguards against government intrusion on the people’s liberty. Strict interpretation is better because it is an approach more likely to get to what the original intent of the Founders of America was. Whereas loose interpretationists can make new laws and invalidate old ones based on an understanding of the Constitution.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1788 the Federalist Papers were mostly written by Madison. The ideas shared in the Federalist Papers were relevant when Madison was alive, however, the problem is: are they still relevant and effective today. First governmental structure in USA is unique, no other government has the same system as this country. It is the only country that changed everything dealing with politics back in that decade, which shows how much the founding fathers were aware of the political issues. News in those days were spread quicker as they occurred but unfortunately most of it are not true or even reliable.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should public opinion dictate how the Constitution is interpreted? Personally, I am more convinced that public opinion should be considered, but should not have the right to interpret the Constitution. Because the citizens are somewhat arbitrary and vulnerable to others’ thoughts, sometimes they petition to redress,…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let us now consider the other side of the coin, the argument in favor of a dead Constitution. In 2008; Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said at the Manhattan Institute, "Let me put it this way; there are really only two ways to interpret the Constitution -- try to discern as best we can what the framers intended or make it up. No matter how ingenious, imaginative or artfully put, unless interpretive methodologies are tied to the original intent of…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    William Daniels Ms. Read HN US History I November 30th, 2015 The Evolution of the Fourth Amendment After more than two hundred since the creation of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, are these documents, the foundation of our government and laws, still relevant today? To determine the relevancy of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, this paper will examine the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment is“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…(Fourth).”It was created in response to British officials unreasonably searching colonists and their belongings (Mclnnis).…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution has been described as a living document because of the changes which have taken place since its conception by our founding fathers. No right or freedom is absolute. While we tout this as one of the great selling points of our country they are not without their restrictions. For example, the First Amendment which covers freedom of religion, speech, and the right to assemble peacefully all have some kind of limitation on them.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. " - Thomas Jefferson The first quote identifies one of the unanimous beliefs of the founding fathers as to the relevance and purpose of the Constitution; it was meant to be absolute. The Constitution puts a significant amount of effort into preventing the anyone, in particular the government, from having too much power. But none of that would matter if they took a step beyond the text, or in other words, disregarded the boundaries set out in the…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Grabber when the government fears the people there is liberty when the people fear the government there is tyranny by thomas jefferson September 17 1887 in philadelphia the main purpose of the us. Constitution is to establish the basic rights of all american citizens and provide direction on how the government should work the constitution also provides the framework for law and order and describes the roles of the government federal judiciary branch legislative branch and executive branch The constitution guarded against tyranny in several ways which were federalism separation of power check and balances and big states vs. small states the first guard against tyranny was federalism which mearns to divide the powers between state and national governments…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The government’s process may be handled as in the Constitution, but the rights stated in it are not followed; so do we really live under ”Constitutional Government”? Having a democracy means that not everyone is going to get what they want, but do the…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays