Drinking Age Should Remain At Age Twenty-One

The legal drinking age should remain at age twenty-one for several reasons. Many of these reasons are for safety. If people start drinking at a young age it can cause brain damage. Many people are aware that drinking below the age of twenty-one can cause brain damage. In fact, 74% of Americans would vote against lowering the drinking age (Engel). It’s still dangerous for anyone to drink alcohol, whether twenty-one or not. The brain is still forming until the mid-twenties (Beacon). With the frontal lobe not yet formed, alcohol can cause great damage to young people. This is why the drinking age must remain at age twenty-one. The fact that the frontal lobe does not finish developing until the mid-20’s was taken into great consideration when the state and federal governments were trying to determine a reasonable drinking age for our country (Beacon). …show more content…
Due to this increase, President Reagan signed the bill to make the minimum legal drinking age twenty-one in all fifty states (Fell). The legal drinking age has remained the same ever since then. It is a good thing that the minimum legal drinking age has been at twenty-one. The drinking age needs to remain at twenty-one for everyone’s best interest. Laura Dean-Mooney gives evidence that the minimum legal drinking age of twenty-one saves lives on and off of the roads. According to Dean-Mooney the number of young people killed annually in crashes involving drunk drivers under 21 has been cut in half. By the end of 2005, the law had saved about 25,000 American lives (Dean-Mooney). Although still dangerous, roads are safer with the minimum legal drinking age being at twenty-one rather than eighteen. One of the purposes for this law is to reduce the deaths of young people caused by drinking and driving