Argumentative Essay: The Existence Of Nazi Germany

The trial of the defendants before me, your honor, is an act of injustice. The entirety of these Nuremberg Trials is illegitimate, clouded by irrational, unjust, and hypocritical accusations that at their core sprout from the victor’s justice of the Allied justices that come from France, England, America, Russia, and countries of the like. When I turn my head in search of a justice whose bias doesn’t lie with Allies and when I search for a justice whose conscience isn’t subjugated by victor’s justice I find no one. Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, Joseph Goebells, and other sovereigns of the Nazi government are certainly culpable of many crimes. But do you see them sitting here awaiting trial? They have done the justice for us and taken their own lives. With that the trial should be unnecessary shouldn’t it be? The malignancy of Hitler has already been absolved with his willful swallowing of a cyanide pill. Why then must you go through with this tediously lengthy trial that serves no purpose? The defendants before me are the subordinates of Hitler, who, during the existence of the Nazi government, were intoxicated by his ostensible invincibility and omniscience. What greater punishment can you inflict on a nation …show more content…
United States. The United States sanctioned the simple action of moving the Japanese 50 miles from the coast. How was the expulsion of the Jews from Germany any different from the United States’s repositioning of the Japanese-American citizens? Since this is widely accepted as common practice, the only thinkable reason that the defendants before are being tried for this alleged crime is victor’s justice. The Allies may have won the war, and they can use that privilege as they may, however they cannot fabricate unjust and outlandish indictments in attempt to discover the non-existent criminality in the defendants before