Argumentative Essay On Cloning To Save Mankind

Improved Essays
Sean Trueblood
Mrs. Karen McKinney Holley
English 1101
27 November 2015
Cloning to Save Mankind Continuing developments in cloning will be crucial in mankind’s development. Many people wonder if cloning is morally justifiable. Some might ask if cloning is mans attempt at trying to become god. Three out of every four American citizens, according to Time magazine in 1993, found human cloning extremely troubling. In the same year from the same source, 46% of people said they would prefer to have a law calling human cloning a felony. Some people want to ban cloning out of the fear that the ability could one day be abused. They also are afraid of the risks. In cloning, there are defects that could arise. In some instances in the past, mice have
…show more content…
Science fiction has also given cloning a bad name. Many people automatically assume the worst upon hearing the word “cloning” uttered. Such books like A Brave New World and Rosemary’s Baby paint a dark and scary painting of a future with clones. On the other slightly more optimistic hand, many people think that cloning could be beneficial to the world. Supporters of cloning think that if a man and a woman want to have a child they should be able to have one. They also want to help couples chances in any way that can be ethically justified. A woman with a single embryo only has around a 10% to 20% chance of becoming pregnant through in-vitro fertilization, a complicated compilation of procedures used to treat fertility. If an embryo were cloned, the woman’s chances of childbirth would be increased vastly. The side I chose to support is the side of continuing to explore the possibilities of cloning. I think that the opinion of this essay can be briefed by a quote from Tim Caulfield, the research director at the University of Alberta. “You don’t ban fertilizer because you can use it to make bombs. Don’t ban cloning because it may be abused. …show more content…
The eggs are unfortunately very small, so the surgeons have to use intensely small needles, around 1/10 the size of a human’s hair. They do not even trust themselves enough to move with such rigor, so they conduct robots to perform the surgeries by control sticks. The robots are manipulated into cutting the eggs with the needles and expelling the DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid. Once removed, it transfers the nucleus of a skin cell into the egg. One of the problems with stem cell research is that it takes a tremendous amount of eggs for a very small amount of stem cell lines, but it can still be very helpful in fighting the tribulations of man.
People are in pain and dying all around the world and cloning could help them. If we keep supporting the efforts to increase our knowledge of the subject and continue to search for solutions, we could save millions of people. Cloning is a dangerous thing because of the risks of the power being abused, so we need to have regulations against corruption. There needs to be laws set and enforced in order to ethically keep cloning development moving forward because it could be very beneficial to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the article “Ethical Issues of Cloning” by Rita Putatunda explains about the problems of cloning. Copying the genes and making new reproductions of the human is equivalent to “playing God”. The successful cloning of Dolly (Sheep) in 1997 brings many tension upon society and furthers the possibility of human cloning. However, there is a high failure rate of cloning and it may alter the genes of the cloned animal/human. Putatunda questions that the cloning outcome might act as a unique individual or have to live like a genetic prisoner.…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The downside to that though is the cost. I could see the government only accepting cloning so that they could control it and get more money. That is one reason I would like to keep it banned. The most important reason I would like to keep it banned is because we do not know whether or not it is safe enough to do for humans. We have had plenty of practice on animals, but no one to confirm whether or not this will work for the best.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They do strive to allow people to be able to have an option to be cloned. According to Joyce C. Havstad, “But they often proceed with their endorsement of human reproductive cloning by dismissing these psychological harms in two ways” (72). Joyce C. Havstad explains the two ways…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Currently the creation of cloning remains a debatable and moral disruption issued as unethical to the human race. Cloning takes away the uniqueness of species in the way that two or more people now share the same of everything especially genes which are supposed to be different from person to person. As science becomes more and more advanced, it seems to be taking humanity into science’s control. The issue of…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Supporters of cloning often use the following three arguments (1) They contend that cloning is just another technology that enables people to have genetic offspring. (2) The purport that cloning is another tool in the fight against genetic disease (3) Cloning will allow people to clone dead loved ones. De Mel-Martin believes that if these arguments are true then we have even more reason to go through with…

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    What´s Therapeutic Cloning?

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Therapeutic Cloning Although not a very popular topic, the issue of cloning human body parts is very relevant in today’s technological world. In 1996, Dr Ian Wilmut of the Roslin Institute was able to successfully clone a sheep named Dolly. Later, in 1998, Japanese scientists were able to clone mice.…

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You can put rules and regulations around cloning but you cannot stop this from getting into the wrong hands and someone using it for terrifying purposes. Kass is right, cloning should be banned in humans. I myself still had a hard time figuring out why I thought cloning was wrong after reading Kass’ arguments. Kass should have stuck with creating a stronger argument against the technological, liberal and meliorist views. I agree that there is definitely some repugnance to the idea of human cloning but Kass should not have argued that the repugnance we feel for human cloning is a reflection of a violation on nature and moral.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    From a religious perspective, it can be seen as playing God. Although, women who aren’t able to have kids may look at it as another opportunity for a child, some say it’s the cure to infertility. It is all about your perspective and how you view the issue. As of right now, human cloning isn’t so much a concern,…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simon Smith stated, “Theories exist about how cloning may lead to a cure for heart attacks, a revolution in cosmetic surgery, organs for organ transplantation, and predictions abound about how cloning technology will save thousands of lives.” Therapeutic cloning will bring medical breakthroughs that we’ve never had before. Many adults aren’t able to have children and cloning will give them another option of having their own child. Also, cloning will be able to save animals from extinction and possibly bring back animals that are extinct.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another reason cloning should not be allowed is because the cloning process could cause severe pain and suffering to humans and animals. Cloning is a dangerous, and agonizing process. Despite years of endless research, approximately 95% of cloning attempts fail, leading to many unnecessary deaths in humans and animals. Even the clone could receive severe problems such as physiological impairments, severe birth defects, and an abrupt death. If cloning is practiced largely, many test subjects will die,…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The issue of cloning has always been around in our everyday lives. Cloning was common in movies such as Jurassic Park and The Lost World, where cloning seemed to be an idea of fantasy and not reality. The idea that scientist could just take a little DNA from a dead mosquito and turn it into something that could tower over a skyscraper was very intriguing to most people. On the other hand, there were movies such as Judd Dredd and Alien Resurrection, in which cloning was necessary in order to save lives.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cloning has many negatives that need to be accounted for, but the positives are so beneficial that cloning should be used in science. The medical advantages such as drug production and helping with fertility problems outweigh the negatives ("Why Clone?"). Finding cures for diseases is a positive of cloning (Cyraoski 468-471). Fixing defective genes is also very beneficial to the world ("Pros and Cons of Human Cloning - HRF"). Faster aging could potentially be fixed with cosmetics and surgeries.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Reproductive Cloning With constant new developments in science, society is forced to react and adapt. Along with these new developments, citizens are left questioning the ethics behind the experiment. Almost one hundred thirty years ago, society was introduced to the idea of cloning. It was not until the year nineteen ninety-six when the idea became reality and the first cloned mammal was born, Dolly the sheep. She set the grounds for the next cloned mammals to come.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientist are trying to clone human as we know they are trying to clone the first human being. The problem is that human cloning is wrong animal cloning is wrong, they are trying to experiment on people and animals which the process will probably kill them both we could make a law to stop human cloning. Human Cloning is a bad thing, scientists are already cloning animals the United Nation needs to pass a nonbinding Declaration on Human Cloning we can not clone humans because it would kill the person who is being cloned we need a law that no more cloning. Scientist have been cloning for a long time as we speak. Scientist have figured out how to clone by using scientific methods as so.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When critics say human cloning is about control, always remember that the free will of cloned human beings cannot be controlled by their genetic ancestors, because they have the freedom of think and acting the way they like. Cloning humans will, in the future help the human species overcome diseases that run in the bloodline of their inheritance of the person and it can be a solution to many surgeries where the survival rate is low. For this to happen though, technology has to improve drastically and cloning technology has to become more…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays