The Consequences Of Animal Experimentation

Great Essays
Animal experimentation has been and still is our main source of scientific research for humans. We have followed this tradition of experimenting on animals for decades, and it has been very useful to us, but at the same time it is cruel and is not 100% accurate. Animal experimentation is way to flawed and risky to put all our trust into it, and with all the dangers and risks that come with experimenting on animals we need to put a stop to it, and find some other way to get the research that we need.

Experimenting on animals is flawed and is way too risky to put all our faith into it.

We put so much faith into the research that comes from experimenting on animals that we expect it to accrete and we don't even think of the
…show more content…
And with all the drugs that do go out there are “Indeed, many health problems currently afflicting humans, such as psychopathology, cancer, drug addiction, Alzheimer's, and AIDS, are species specific.” so not only is it cruel to the animals themselves it is affects us too. We could change someone's life in one second from information that has been wrongly proven. There are so many consequences of experimenting on animals and it has been affecting us “In fact, there have been numerous reports recently of approved drugs causing serious and unexpected health problems, leading the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to remove the products from the market or require black-box warnings on their labels. The FDA has reported that "adverse events associated with drugs are the single leading contributor to preventable patient injury, and may cost the lives of up to 100,000 Americans, account for more than 3 million hospital admissions, and increase the nation's hospitalization bill by up to $17 billion each year." The agency estimates that drug-related injuries outside the hospital add $76.6 billion to health care costs”. Why would we keep on experimenting on animals if this is the out”.

We know the risks of experimenting on animals but we still keep on doing it, we know the cost of it and we known how much it is affecting not only us but nature too. With all
…show more content…
Those not specifically created for research come from licensed Class B animal dealers that are regulated and inspected by the USDA [US Department of Agriculture]. Pets do become lost and may never be found but that does not mean that they end up in research laboratories. Pet owners have a responsibility to make sure their animals can be easily identified and returned if lost—through collars with tags, tattoos and/or microchips”. They do have laws for experimenting on animals so it is not completely inhumane.Wesley J. Smith argues “that research on animals has been indispensable in developing ways to treat human disease. No one likes the idea of experimenting on animals, he says, and efforts are being made to reduce it to a minimum; however, there is no other way to do the necessary research and check the safety of new drugs. Medical treatments have to be tested on living organisms; if not on animals, then on humans, which in Smith's opinion would be an atrocity. Smith is a senior fellow for the Discovery Institute's program on human exceptionalism. He also consults with the Patients Rights Council and the Center for Bioethics and Culture.” I agree with his point but I think that we use to need experimentation and that it is has served its purpose.

We are and should be thankful

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This suffering has been deemed ethically permissible, provided that researchers express confidence in their ability to achieve predictable benefits to humans (Doke & Dhawale, 2015; Ferdowsian & Beck, 2011, p.2). Modern scientific knowledge paired with tragic historical instances of human drug toxicity has raised questions and concerns regarding the ethics of preclinical animal testing for both humans and animals. If humans are not benefitting from the suffering of animal testing models, then the permissibility parameters for their suffering are not being fulfilled. If preclinical animal data cannot be accurately translated to real-life human scenarios, then human trials are being conducted unethically, as risks may no longer be outweighed by benefits, and study participants do not consent to the possibility of unknown risks or the fact that the trial in which they are deciding to participate, has been designed based on inaccurate assumptions (Greek, Hansen & Pippus, 2012; Green,…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This still allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, and may even end in brain damage (“Animal” Is). Animals are still being used for drug testing and safety trails. As many as 800 animals are sometimes tested, expert’s note, before a drug is determines to be safe enough to proceed to a clinical trial. Newsweek medical reporter, John Ericson, wrote in March 2014 “Pick any drug you’ve heard of; it was probably tested on a rat” (“Animal Rights”). Laws make sure that animals have enough space, they are in the right temperature environment, and they are fed, and watered.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clinical Research Ethics While attempting to do clinical research, those in charge truly want to do everything they can to help those who need help. There must be a lot on the shoulders of these researchers while leading these clinical trials since there is so much at stake. In the world of medicine, ethics can be easily tested and have been tested for a long time in history. In 1978, the first child was born from a test tube. This means that the parent of the child was unable to conceive naturally.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bailey, Matthew R. “It's Time to End Ineffective And Cruel Animal Testing.” Wall Street Journal, 09 Oct 2017, PP. 16A. Matthew R. Bailey, in his newspaper article “It's Time to End Ineffective And Cruel Animal Testing” (2017), the author argues that testing drugs on animals is ineffective and claims animal lovers favor research that saves animals lives instead of killing them. In order for Bailey to get his point across, he states “Testing drugs on animals is notoriously ineffective. Not only do laboratory animals suffer from confinement and research procedures, but because they present different biologies and physiologies, different species (and even breeds within a species) respond differently to various substances.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The controversy begins with the idea that animals that are not treated humanely prior to, during, and after research. According to Jacqueline L. Longe, writer of the article “Animal Experimentation,” “The Animal Welfare Act (Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966, P.L. 89-544) was signed into law by then-President Lyndon Johnson in August 1966. The Act covers the humane housing and treatment of cats, dogs, hamsters, rabbits, nonhuman primates, and guinea pigs.” Precautions have already been taken to ensure that household animals are not treated poorly but are treated humanely. Animals that are needed specifically for research such as rats and mice are exempt from the Animal Welfare Act because they are highly important for health research.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It raises the concept about who decides what is an appropriate model to test human diseases and medicines. She raises the issue of whether there are sufficient reasons to justify what humans are doing to laboratory animals. She debates whether there will ever be reason enough to do with wicked risks that could happen to these animals. She discusses how this inequality in the lab stems from the lab practices and how these should be improved to recognize the importance of these animal…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the FDA, 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal test, fail in humans(Klausner). It is time for scientist to divorce the idea of researching on animals and adapt to using methods like in vitro testing, computer models, and human tissues. Former U.S. national Institutes of Health director, Elias Zerhouni, said ,“We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. … We all drank the Kool-Aid on that one, me included. … The problem is that [animal testing] hasn’t worked, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals all around the world are used for testing and research. People always wonder why people use animals. They ask why would scientist put these innocent creatures through something horrible. It has been proven that scientist use about 100 million animals for testing and research each year. From personal research, I have seen many inhumane things happen to these creatures that should not happen.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Animal Testing Bad

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Animals have always been there and helped us humans with many various things such as food, protection, being a friend, and many other things. Animals are everywhere we look, just looking put the window you are bound to see a bird or a fly or some other little animal or creature running around. Some animals make people go crazy such as dogs or cats and other animals make people scream and run the other direction like rats or snakes. Since at least 500 BC humans have tested products and performed various experiments on animals (ProCon.org). Animals such as rats, monkeys, cats and dogs are used for tests and experiments for the humans benefit without having a say in the matter.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lifesaving drugs and medication could come out even faster if scientists tested on humans rather than animals because of the difference in human and animal body chemistry. Considering this, animal testing cannot be justified by the fact that it has saved many human…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inaccurate Animal Testing

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Heart attacks, organ failure, and lethal dysrhythmias are only a few of the dreadful reactions humans have suffered through on medication as a result of the inaccuracy of animal testing (Greek). Using animals for experiments is incredibly inaccurate due to the vast differences between animal and human biological makeup (Animal Aid). As a result, during past experiments, medications have had “totally the opposite effect” on animals than they did on humans (Animal Aid). Consequently, after already turning innocent animals into unhealthy victims while producing these products, humans themselves have also become oblivious victims to this research technique as they consume these unreliable items. Scientists spend many stressful hours conducting research through this unstable technique, while their outcomes are rarely advancements in health care.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Satire On Animal Testing

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We keep doing new test on animals even if they won't benefit us at all. Animals could react positively to a drug but it could be harmful to humans and this also goes the other way around. “For example TGN1412 drug was tested on…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal Experimentation Animal experimentation has been around for many centuries. Humans perform these experiments on all species of animals to find different effect of a product it could have on a human. Three advantages in particular advantages are, it helps scientists gain a better understanding for cures of different diseases, this practice makes a vital advance in medicine, and for the expense of treatments and cures animals should not have rights when it comes to research. Although there are many advantages to animal experimentation, there are also disadvantages which include, there is no benefit for the humans, it is cruel, and is dangerous for humans to be treated only after a trial on animals. The first advantage to animal experimentation is using animals like rats can help the scientist gain better knowledge for different…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not only have millions of innocent animals perished due to the numerous experimentations that were completed in laboratories all over the United States and other parts of the world, but some of these experimentations have proven to be futile. In other…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Viewpoints

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After studying multiple views on animal testing I have come to realize my personal view has now changed since the start of my research. Before undergoing heavy study into animal testing I believed that all types of animal testing should be stopped, but now I believe that the idea is very beneficial and should only be done when the rights of the animal are considered. In the coming years, hopefully, more regulations can be passed to ensure that all animal’s lives are protected during experimentation. Although most animals are treated with care and no pain is dealt to them when undergoing testing, it would be a lie if I stated no animals are harmed during the process. Animal testing is extremely useful in developing life-saving drugs and medicine.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays