Other programs are secular and even briefly go over the use of contraception and protection while still emphasizing abstinence. Despite these differences, the goal of abstinence based sex education is the same: lower teen pregnancy and STI transmission rates by delaying first sex among teens. Ironically, statistics show that these forms of sex education correlate with higher rates of teen pregnancy- even going so far to show an upward trend with different levels of strictness in said education policies [3]. In a separate study, it was found that surveyed teens who had were taught abstinence-based sex education experienced an increase in teen pregnancy rates, STI transmission, a decrease in condom or contraceptive use, and little to no change in delay of first sex [1]. Overall, since abstinence education is ineffective in delaying first sex, it is no surprise that teen pregnancy and STI transmission rates would be so high considering these programs leave out important information on contraception and protection for teens that do have …show more content…
Overall, statistics in both the US and Europe show that abstinence-only education is wholly ineffective in attaining its goal of reducing the rate of teen pregnancy through delay and prevention of premarital sex. In fact, it has been shown to often have the opposite effect. Sex positive education, that emphasizes the use of protection and contraception, yields more positive results. Not only does it reduce the rate of STI transmission and pregnancy among teens, but it also delays and reduces teen sexual activity. It is a win/win situation and, as Europe has demonstrated, can be effectively implemented even among conservative and religious