In a recent article Dr. Brooke A. Burks stated, “Both those who support and oppose the Common Core Standards generally agree with the main objective: prepare students to compete in the ever-changing job market and global economy”, proving that all in all, Common Core is a beneficial plan (Burks). There seem to be three central goals of The Common Core Standards; prepare students for college or other jobs, help develop critical thinking, and having an equal, common set of standards nationwide. The set of standards will help with the students’ critical thinking skills. The new set of tests makes students think deeper and use problem solving skills to answer the questions. There is the argument that Common Core creates a lack of creativity, yet it requires students to think outside of the box and be “creative” in their thought …show more content…
The new tests alone would cost $1.2 billion during that same period,” which is an insane amount of money to risk on a system that has its doubts (Elliot). Yet if the standards are beneficial, that cost will be worth it in the future.
Creativity and difficulty are also issues with Common Core. In the U.S News article a teacher has stated, “Academic creativity has been drained from degraded and overworked experienced teachers. Uniformity has sucked the life out of teaching and learning” (Greene). In a different article another teacher claimed, “We’re becoming cookie cutter teachers, and our children are cookie cutter children”, however, there may be required standards but teachers should always be able to incorporate their own ideas as well, there is nothing forcing teachers to make lessons boring