Compromise Of 1850

Improved Essays
The outbreak of the Civil War was brought on by a number of issues, acts and debates throughout the 1850’s and early 1860’s. However, the event that was the kickoff for these major turning events in history was the Mexican-American War. It was a national debate regarding whether slavery should enter the country, when the United States needed to determine what to do with the land they gained from the war. After the war, leaders in the 1850s began to compromise. Their compromises did nothing to help solve the issue, all it seemed to do was intensify the issue.
The early 1850’s had a large impact on the outbreak of the Civil War. In the Compromise of 1850, the slave trade in Washington DC was banned, the boundary between Texas and Mexico was
…show more content…
This contributed to the Civil War because the North was angry they had to capture and return slaves, and the South was frustrated that there were now more free states than slave states. Following the Compromise of 1850 was a novel titled Uncle Tom’s Cabin, written by Harriet Beecher Stowe. Stowe was appalled by the Fugitive Slave Act, which passed as a result of the Compromise of 1850. In her book, Stowe depicted the slaves as actual human beings, with feelings and emotions. The advertisement for Uncle Tom’s Cabin says it is “The Greatest Book of the Age” (Document B). The novel showed the harsh realities of slave life, and ended up portraying Southerners in a bad light. The book didn’t sit well with the South; they thought it was unfair, and characterized them as too intense. However, the book swelled the abolitionist movement in the North, who ended up detesting slavery even more. This caused tensions between the North and South, helping contribute to the Civil War. In 1854, Stephen Douglas proposed to split up the Nebraska territory, Kansas-Nebraska. The slavery issue would conclusively be based upon popular sovereignty. The Kansas territory would end up being slave, and the …show more content…
Stephen Douglas, a politician and leader of the Democratic party, was in favor of slavery. He resorted to popular sovereignty, which eventually caused Bleeding Kansas. Douglas also stirred up trouble during the Dred Scott case. He continued to support and push on with popular sovereignty, without directly saying that the Court was wrong with their decision. When James Buchanan tried to get Kansas admitted as a slave state, the people of the state rejected this on account of popular sovereignty, and became a free state. This decision made Stephen Douglas and James Buchanan enemies. The political cartoon titled “Douglas Hatches a Slavery Problem” shows each issue that Douglas destroyed, such as the Dred Scott case and free Kansas (Document D). The issue of popular sovereignty and Stephen Douglas further pushed for Civil War. Tying in with Stephen Douglas was the Dred Scott court case. Dred Scott was an African American who sued for his freedom on the basis that he lived on free soil, and was therefore free. However, the court decided that because Scott was a black slave, and not a citizen, he could not sue in federal court. As a result, African Americans were no longer citizens in both the North and South. This case also dictated that there was no such thing as a free state. The court case was immensely important and gained popularity quickly- Dred Scott and his wife even appeared on the front

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Republicans formalized themselves in Congress and gained massive reputation during the 1856 presidential race with President James Buchanan (Democrat) won with 176 electoral votes and John C. Fremont (Republican) with only 114 electoral votes. Abraham Lincoln swore into the Republican party, but although he lost to Stephen A. Douglas for his Senate seat, he would later be sworn into the White House in 1860, defeating Stephen A. Douglas, the very mastermind who made the infamous Kansas-Nebraska act. But Douglas was not a racist of what many people…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While in office there was the dred scott decision, The Kansas question,Panic of 1857. Which states were admitted into the Union. Supreme Court rules in Dred Scott case. The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery. In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois,…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1800s tension was beginning to build between the north and south over the issue of slavery. Three major compromises helped contribute to these tensions and lead to eventual war. These are the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. These compromises and their effects had major consequences that shaped the nation of their time.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The ruling of the case said that no African-American had rights and that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. Many of the northern states denounced the law which led to the formation of the Republican party. Historians believe that the ruling of this case was the biggest mistake that the Supreme Court ever made. If it was not for Dred Scott’s perseverance and motivation for the issue of freedom and citizenship for African - Americans the issue may have never come up. Even though Dred Scott and his family did not receive their freedom from this case, they did keep their family together through the case, which was unheard of during this time.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tariff Dbq

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The “Lecompton Constitution” used popular sovereignty to decide whether Kansas or Nebraska should be brought into Union with a constitution or with more slaves. The constitution was rejected and Kansas was brought into the Union as a free state in 1858 (Nebraska’s fate would be decided after the war.) With the results of the decisions, brawls between proslavery and antislavery people spread like wildfire across Kansas, thus giving it the nickname, “Bleeding Kansas.” The fighting even spread to the United States Senate! A head-turning speech in which Charles Sumner shot down the opinion of proslavery singled out Andrew Butler for being a Southern Senator.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott was a former slave whose slave’s owner moved to a free state where slavery is prohibited. When they returned to Missouri Scott sued for his freedom that he had by living in a free territory. The discussion take place during the trial was basically that a Negro slave descendants free or not were not apart of the people. Africans were inferior and had no right of a white man. They also challenged the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution by stating that the situation is not warranted by the constitution.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas attempted to pass both the Kansas-Nebraska Act, as well as the Compromise of 1850. He sought to repeal the ban of slavery north of the 36 degree 30” line previously established in the Missouri Compromise and to admit California as a slave state. In so doing, he sparked political controversy creating a divide between between anti-slavery (typically Northern) and pro-slavery (typically southern) politicians. These pro-slavery laws ignited widespread anger throughout the North, creating fissures within political parties which would eventually lead to divisions within them. Additionally, the numerous Acts passed in an effort to appease each side of the slavery controversy, also undermined the Country’s overall domestic tranquility.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kentucky Social Issue

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This slave debate caused a turmoil within Kentucky, a state that would be added to the Union. Politics divide nations. There are few moments in which a group of people can all agree on something. Slavery was an issue that greatly divided. When it mixed with politics it made things even more difficult.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduction The American civil started purely as a military effort with limited political objectives especially for the white community. By early 1861 white citizen’s main aim of the fight was to preserve the union and as well maintain a democratic republic. The north fought for reunification whereas the south fought for independence during the initial stages of the civil war. However, the war changed between 1862 and 1863 as a result of emancipation.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Future president, Abraham Lincoln shared his opinion of the case, " What Dred Scott's master might lawfully do with Dred Scott, in the free state of Illinois, every other master may lawfully do with any other one, or 1,000 slaves, in Illinois, or in any other free state. " This was when he gave his “House Divided” speech. Meaning that it doesn’t only made a difference in Dred Scott’s life, it also applies to among the others who are like Dred…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sandford. Lincoln tried to force Douglas to choose between his principle of popular sovereignty proposed in his Kansas-Nebraska Act which created the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska and endowed the citizens the legislative power to decide, through popular sovereignty, whether or not they would allow slavery, and the decision reached by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. The case surrounded an enslaved African American man that was suing for his freedom after being held captive within the boundaries of two free states. The issues before the court had been whether or not entering “free” territory made a slave free and whether this freedom granted blacks the ability to sue in federal court. The justices ruled that under the language of the constitution did not apply to blacks because within the context of when the constitution was written, slaves were seen solely as property and had no rights.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the 1850s, slavery, and other political issues between the states, became a sizable issue. Slavery began to dissect people. For example, the Northerners began to begin support free soil and abolition. However, the Southerners disagreed, and tension increased dramatically. Soon, the Southern slaveowners felt that their rights were no longer being illustrated, and felt that they must succeed (secession is the act of withdrawing from an organization, union, military alliance or especially a political entity, to be protected from Northern abuse.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was an African American man in the United States that sued for the freedom of himself, the freedom of his wife, and the freedom of his kids in the Dred Scott vs. Stanford case. Dred Scott believed that he and his wife should have been granted the privilege of becoming United States of America citizens because he and his wife had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory for four years. The U.S. Supreme Court voted against Dred Scott 7-2. With the disagreement of the Supreme Court, the Dred Scott Decision was brought up. The Dred Scott Decision was a decision in which free or slaved African-Americans were not allowed to be American citizens and the federal government had power to regulate slavery.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As The United states began a time of expansion into the west in the late 1830’s, debates over whether or not slavery would be permitted in those territories vacated by the native Americans caused great disagreements in Government and Society. While slavery is the most obvious reason for succession, Westward expansion and the rights of the new states were responsible for much of the violent conflicts that lead to the Civil War. States struggled to find common ground, but the differences between North and South and new Immigration made A series of compromises were created but by 1860 compromise had failed. Southerners feared an increase in free states would create an imbalance of power and create an advantage to the abolition of slavery.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe the Civil War was fought over the issue of slavery, state’s rights, and also the power to control the West. What ultimately caused the Civil War would be the Compromise of 1850. Other main factors that caused the Civil War would be John Brown’s raid, the Second Great Awakening, and also the involvement of women in the Abolitionist movement. The reason as to why the Compromise of 1850 was the main cause of the Civil War would be due to the fact that it increased sectionalism, did not solve the issue of slavery, and also paved the way for the Fugitive Slave Laws of 1850. The reason why these events are the most significant are that they are the most pivotal events to occur during this time, which ultimately paved the way for the first…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays