The Compromise Of 1850: The Causes Of The Civil War

Superior Essays
The Compromise of 1850 was a series of congressional statutes passed in September of 1850, in which the United States Congress sought out to settle conflicts between those who opposed slavery in the North and those in favor of slavery in the South. There is much speculation about what the United States would be like today without this Compromise. Which leads to the question, should the Compromise have ever been approved? Still, regardless if the Compromise was approved or not, the Civil War was an inevitable event in American history. The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt to solve tensions between the North and the South over the expansion of slavery, specifically into Texas, which was a territory obtained by the United States in the Mexican …show more content…
However, I do not feel that the Compromise should have ever been approved because it did not fix the problem, nor did it prevent a war, it simply prolonged the issues that would force the war between the two in the years to come. Not to mention the Compromise allowed slavery to continue, any negotiation that allows for the act of slavery to exist, is doomed. The fact is that both sides felt they had given up too much and not received enough in return. There were also many issues that led to the failure of the Compromise of 1850 such as, slavery and economics but it was primarily about states right, specifically the right to practice slavery. It is my opinion, that the American Civil War was unavoidable. The war was destined to take place unless one side decided to back down from the other, which was not going to happen due to the presence of hardliners in both the North and the South. The only way to avoid Civil War was to abolish slavery, the South was not going to let that happen without a fight. They needed slaves in their society and were more than established in their ways. Needless to say, the South did not give up their position on the institution of slavery and they had good reason not to. The Southern economy was basically one of agriculture and the slave population was a very important component to their development. The Southern states desired to make decision for themselves within the state, which was ultimately the right to practice slavery. Had we avoided the Civil War, slavery would had probably continued for a much longer period, although eventually it would have been phased out, due to the inventions of machinery and also by the pressure of other

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Missouri Compromise in 1820, Nat Turner's Rebellion in 1831, Compromise of 1850 in 1850 and Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 were some the acts at that time which lead to south and north grew apart. (Unit 3 A Nation Divided ) These political compromises did not reduce tension and resulted into the Civil War. The Missouri compromise was remained ineffective in the issue of tension between the southern…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before this conciliation, sectionalism seemed to be on an increasing rise in popularity. This compromise delayed the Civil War by several decades.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise of 1850 The “Compromise of 1850” was a resolution constructed by Henry Clay in an attempt to appease both Northerners and Southerners, in regards to if the new territorial expansions acquired from the war with Mexico and subsequent “Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo” in 1848, should allow slavery. The compromise allowed California to be a free state and gave New Mexico and Utah the policy of “Popular Sovereignty” or the ability for the people of the state to decide on slavery. Texas was given relief on 10 millions dollars worth of debt in the compromise for the re-allotment of a portion of it 's land to New Mexico. The compromise also outlawed slavery in Washington DC, as the spectacle was a national embarrassment.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1860 Political Compromise

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I think the political compromise over the sectional crisis of the 1850s seemed impossible by the 1860 because of the events leading up to the 1860 election and the election itself. The North’s neglect to obey the Fugitive State Law angered southern states and was a problem especially for Border States. When I slave was able to escape to the north, they did everything they could to make the slave a “free man”. A known fact about the north is they hated slavery as Henry Benning explained in his speech, and president Buchanan did nothing to prevent the secession of the seven states, as congress was more active during Buchanan’s time as president. All of the events angered or did little to prevent the events about to take place in the south and…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Compromise also didn't have a direct method by which states would hold the elections that decided the issue of slavery for their territory. So it was left to Congress to pass individual laws like the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Which will be discussed later in this paper. So the Compromise left the elections issue unresolved, examples are: 1.) The United States had just recently acquired a substantial amount of land because of its war with Mexico.…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The path to the Civil War was a long one. There were various points in American history that lead to the war; such as the Missouri Compromise; the Kansas-Nebraska Act; the political idea of nullification; the political idea of secession; John Brown; the election of Abraham Lincoln; secession; and slavery. Before the Missouri compromise states were evenly divided between slave states and Free states. In 1819 Missouri requested to join the Union as a slave state, which would upset the balance between the two factions. In March 1820 Congress allowed Missouri to be a slave state but Main would be a free state and any new state formed in the lands of the Louisiana Purchase of latitude 36°30′ would be Free states.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For the majority of American History leading up to the Civil War, civilians had been divided over the issue of slavery and politics. The nation had a long history of compromise that seemed necessary to keep the nation unified. Most of these compromises avoided the issue of slavery, as politicians and “great compromisers” like Henry Clay aimed to prevent the inevitable split between the North and South. There was a turning point, however, in the North and South, when compromise was no longer an option. Although the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was the immediate and final trigger for southern secession, other attributes including the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Bleeding Kansas, and the Dred Scott decision of 1857 drove the South further towards…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War DBQ

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This compromise was one of the last efforts to prevent the Civil War from taking place. The Crittenden Compromise was created with the objective to ensure the permanent existence of slavery in the states that it was permitted and reinforce the line that separated the free and slave states. Showing that people were concerned with the issue of southern secession, and the compromise was created to prevent the separation of the south and to do this they tried to change slavery laws showing that the main concern was secession and slavery was only a collateral factor or…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil War was inevitable because it couldn’t have been prevented. It was inescapable because the South would have a hard time running their economy without their slaves. The Southern states needed their slaves to work for them, therefore, they wouldn’t give their slaves up very easily. When Abraham Lincoln was elected President over Democrat, Stephen A. Douglas, the South was worried that he would take away all their slaves. The Southern states’ economy was made up of mostly farms and agriculture, while the North had more factories, so the North didn’t depend on slaves to do their labor.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, the Civil War freed slaves and months after the war the 13th Amendment was ratified which abolished slavery. The Confederate states also joined the Union sometime after the civil war. My thought is that if the war wouldn’t have occurred there would still possible be slavery as in the 18th century and of course a divide between the Union and the Confederate. What’s more, if the South would have won the war I believe that the flag individuals would see everyday would have been the confederate flag; however, the Union defeated the Confederates and ended slavery and still protected the Union which…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the Civil War predictable? Did any events indefinitely cause the South to desire a split from the North? The North and the South had a growing tension between them for many reasons, and the northern abolitionists encouraged a Civil War through their actions of protest. Although many Americans were affected minimally by the changes of the nation, abolitionists inevitably foresaw a Civil War because the growing tensions between the North and the South became apparent in political and social changes, slavery issues, and the growing occurrence of rebellions. Political and social changes occurred in many ways, including The Second Great Awakening, Lincoln’s presidential election to office, the way the North and the South dealt with one another,…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Yes, the war could have been prevented if Lincoln just allowed the states to secede, but that was not going to happen. Lincoln did not believe in having two nations under one…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1800s tension was beginning to build between the north and south over the issue of slavery. Three major compromises helped contribute to these tensions and lead to eventual war. These are the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. These compromises and their effects had major consequences that shaped the nation of their time.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Essay

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Northern states and the Southern states had their differences in their beliefs, on profuse occasions—specifically on slavery—compromises had squelch down the bad blood between them. However, in 1789, even after the Constitution was adopted by all of the States to amalgamate as a nation, for more than thirty years, the temporarily ceased frictions between the North and South went to and fro once more. Thus, by 1861, these opposing ideals between the disputants were so prodigious that the compromises do not seem enticing to either antithetical stance. Henceforth, this led to the secession of the Southern states, much to the Northern states’ disgust and eventually to the Civil War.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1829, American settlers began to reside in Mexico’s territories in the southwest, disregarding their customs and laws. American colonists in Texas protested Mexican rule, sparking the Texas Revolution in 1835. Soon after, Mexican dictator Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna attacked Alamo and won, but the Treaty of Velasco gave Texas independence and created the border between Texas and Mexico (Berkin 314). Unfortunately, Mexicans wanted renegotiation of the treaty, threatening war. On April 22, 1846, Mexico announced that its territory had been invaded and declared war.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays