The Clausewitz: The Cause Of War

Decent Essays
Clausewitz attributes war as a fall out of political intercourse between a state's government and other nations views on the conduct of the state's government. He rejects the idea that war just plays on hostilities, but it requires the interaction between different states' government because war starts with disagreement between how a government runs its policies within its state. Additionally, he says policy itself manifests war to the point that he contributes a country's policy as the cause of war instead of tensions between states.

The Correlates of War gathers quantitative and qualitative data as means to bring more knowledge to understand war. It looks into the underlying factors that cause states to engage in

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Natalie Zemon Davis successfully unearths and retells the famous case of Martin Guerre, a peasant from sixteenth century France who returns home to find that another man, Arnaud du Tilh, has stolen his identity and claimed his wife, Bertrande de Rols, and his property. Davis’ uses two primary sources to influence her writing. The book, “Arreste Memorable” by Judge Jean de Coras and “The Admirable History of the Pseudo-Martin” by the lawyer Guillaume La Sueur. In addition, digs through court and financial records to piece together the motivations and aspirations of the three villagers. The purpose of Davis’ work is to explain that the “adventures of three young villagers are not too many steps beyond the more common experience of their neighbors, and that an impostor’s fabrication has links with more ordinary ways of creating personal identity” (Zemon Davis).…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question: How does Clausewitz's paradoxical trinity explain the changes to the character of warfare from the methods used by Frederick the Great to those that followed in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries? I. Thesis: Clausewitz’s paradoxical trinity explains the changes to the character of warfare from the ‘political-ideological French Revolution ’ to the ‘military revolution of the Great War ’ by acknowledging the variable but compelling relationships between: instruments of subordination such as government and policy; the implementation of ‘courage and talent ’ in the ‘realm of probability and chance’ by the military commander and his forces; and the resolve of the people, on all sides of the conflict. I. Major Point…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If his insights are still relevant today, they must withstand criticism. One critique from Martin Van Creveld discounts Clausewitz’s primacy of policy and claims that war is not the continuation of politics but rather, “a social activity resting upon some kind of organization.” He believes that a person has no “interest” in war because there is nothing gained in death, and further that individual interests often run counter to the interests of a group. Van Creveld approaches his opinion on war with the understanding that it is not a rational experience. This approach runs counter to Clausewitz who believed that war was a rational experience.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Restrictive limitations imposed by political and military leaders had a negative impact as they degraded the airpower’s overall effectiveness and efficiency. American airpower struggled to meet high expectations and to apply its destructive power in an effective way in limited wars. The outcome of the wars in Korea and Vietnam Wars reflected significant political and military concerns regarding potential implications of airpower excesses and dramatically limited its strategic effect. Overall, it shows that the same destructive power that makes airpower an effective deterrent tool can also degrade its strategic effectiveness when political restraints affect the best way to use the means to achieving the desired political objectives.184 As Clausewitz stated “War may have its own grammar but not its own…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the fourth edition of Just and Unjust Wars by Michael Walzer, Walzer discusses the crime, logic, rules, morals of soldiers, and finally the war convention. As discussed in the previous reading, Holsti also addresses the logic and war convention that must take place at the end of each war in order to ensure more satisfaction between the two sides in battle. Waltzer states that is is possible to fight a just war unjustly and for an unjust war to be fought in strict accordance to the laws of war. The author throughout this reading talks about how war is a crime. Walzer asks, "why is it wrong to start a war?”…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carl von Clausewitz was a Prussian general and military theorist who is known best for his idea that war is more of a political continuation and for his concept of total war. He, himself entered the war world at the very young age of twelve. Carl then later continued to joined to fight against the French and after joined the Russian forces. Clausewitz had his fare share of experience in wars, he experienced it first hand. He then following the Napoleonic wars wrote one of his greats works On War.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This article discusses the under evaluation of the effects of war carried out by the United States military. Although there is much debate about foreign policy, there isn’t must justification for our nation’s wars. As the Iraq war grew unpopular, the analytical focus shifted deficiencies in intelligence analysis, war-planning, and counterinsurgency doctrine. There is not much focus on the theories of democratization, energy security, non-proliferation, and of failed states justifying the war and occupation. As the studies are focused on being cost efficient, recent U.S. wars proven that overthrowing dictators ruling over fractious organizations might cause lasting conflicts rather than stability, let alone liberal democracy.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    And the cost of war should be economically accessed to determine if there are enough assets to complete the goal. Therefore, “Some political theorists have maintained that the concept itself of “justice” in warfare is irrelevant: once the state-to-state violence starts, the domain of justice is left irrevocably behind, and only force matters, until a new power equilibrium is reached, and on its foundation the domain of peacetime justice is then reestablished.” (Bess, p.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Causes Of War Vonnegut

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Through the novel, Vonnegut rapidly uses so it goes to signify the immense death tolls associated amount of modern warfare. The term implies that death and war are part of one big circle: life, death, and revenge. When he returned to war from furlough, his “regiment was in the process of being destroyed by the Germans in the famous Battle of the Bulge” (32). In the battle “the American losses were serious, 62,439 casualties in all categories and about half lost as killed or captured” (Bulge). The war was so disrupting to him that he has to use tralfamadorians to help cope with his PTSD.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    War Is Never Absolute

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Finally, according to Clausewitz the result of war is never absolute. The statement is very powerful and the history proofed it very well. It related with the end of World War I, because the military of Germany were not happy with the decision of politicians. It supports the broad view at the different things including the end of war. In addition, it accompanies our minds towards the reasons of World War II.…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scholars like Hans Morgenthau, Henry Kissinger and Kenneth Waltz who are mostly associated with realism consider anarchy as the primary characteristic of the international system meaning that there is no central authority to settle disputes among competing member states. States therefore compete with each other due to the lack of a central authority. Realists view the world in terms of competition and conflict whereby there is a recurring struggle for power and its management. Kenneth Waltz further argues that nature and behavior of human beings is the root cause of conflict and war. In his book, Man, the State and War, Waltz’s views suggest that a human being’s inappropriate behavior or his evil ways is what leads to war (Waltz 2001, pg 39).…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Today, technological advances in warfare have challenged the foundational principles of Just War Theory and generated scrutiny around ethical behavior in combatant environments. Just War Theory refers to a set of rules that a sovereign state is expected to follow before engaging in war, during war, and after war—jus ad bellum, jus in bellum, and jus post bellum, respectively. With the increased employment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) or drone strikes under the Obama Administration, one may doubt the morality of these attacks. Specifically, the aims of this essay seek to answer the question on whether or not drone strikes in Yemen adhere to the principles of Just War Theory. Considering the unprecedented and regular use of this technology,…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Rationalist Explanations for War,” James Fearon argues that due to war’s costly nature and states’ risk-averse, or at least risk-neutral, tendencies, there should always exist some possible prewar agreement between two disputing states that both parties would prefer to achieve over committing to war. While seeking to reveal his main claim that war is caused by information problems, commitment problems, and issue indivisibilities, Fearon critiques five traditional Neorealist explanations of war: anarchy, positive expected utility, preventive war, lack of information, and miscalculation of relative power. Although Fearon’s critique of the majority of these theories are earnest and do expose multiple logical shortcomings, his rapid dismissal…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Prominent in realist theory is the concept of anarchy. Anarchy in international politics is defined by Mearsheimer as a system of ‘independent political units (states) that have no central authority above them’ (Mearsheimer 1994). Such a system promotes the concepts of self-help, statism and survival which suggest that war is the result of independent states fighting for power and national interest in order to survive. Given that the world has only been at peace for 8% of all of recorded history (Hedges 2003), these concepts are of great significance to realist in order to dissect war and understand why it is so prominent in international politics. Therefore, the bases of this essay will be formed using the aforementioned concepts to outline…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Leading for Change Assignment Task 1 (BUSM 4395_1660) Foreign Auto Shop Case Study Group Member Details: 1. Aparna Nair: s3483537 - (Group Leader) 2. Brian Herman: s3456091 3. Daniel Ferdian: s3513876 Case Question and Answers 1. What is the usual leadership situation in the auto repair shop (consider the nature of the task, subordinates, and environment)?…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays